Guest guest Posted April 21, 1999 Report Share Posted April 21, 1999 Hi Gizelle: Thought I'd add my 2c on this issue. This is a big one for me. As you probably know, this whole separation of mind and body is a characteristic of western thinking and therefore of Western medicine. But this view is not shared by Eastern thinking and therefore not shared by Eastern medicine. If you think about it, it would be impossible for any biological event to not have accompanying psychological component. After all, our brains are housed in our bodies. Likewise a psychological event would probably always have a biological component. It may be subtle. It may be as simple as when you get angry enough, your blood pressure goes up, even if you don't normally have high blood pressure. Would it make sense to say your high blood pressure reading is " in your head " ? This the wrong question really. Your blood vessels can and did constrict, you didnt " think " they did. In another scenario, from what I understand about vaginismus, it seems women with it have had some kind of trauma whether it be an acute incident of abuse, or ,vestibulitis or vulvadynia. Now, having been raped or abused or having vestibultis or vulvdynia are hardly the same. But they both affect one psychologcially, and the defensive contraction is a *physical* event connected to a *psychologcial event,* BUT it is also a *physical* event connected to a *physical* event. Then, it is also a psychological event connected to a biological/physical event, on moer than pne level, because having vaginismus becomes its own physical and psychological problem. So the way I see it, is there is no real way to determine when a psychological event begins or ends or overlap with a physical one, especially when dealing with sexual issues,because they are supposed to have a psychological component. Arousal, sex, pregnancy , childbirth are all important to women's lives. It would be virtually impossible to experience them normally without feeling anything. So if things go wrong, we are definitely going to feel things in a big, big way. I will wind down my rantings by saying that probably the reason the terms psychogenic vs psychosomatic don't appear clear is because no good physician would ever say *they* were clear on it. And the real kick in the head is, because of our culture, it is implied that a mental component is something *negative*. Traditional Eastern medicien, as I understand it at least, doesn't " go there " .Mind and body issues are addressed simultaneously, and, I suppose, with a good practicitioner, in the spirit of balance and compassion. Hope this helps. Or is at least interesting. : ) -- ==================== Thielke NuMuse Music Kensington, MD ts@... ==================== " Klattu...Burata......Nikto Klattu...Burata......Nikto Klattu...Burata......Nikto " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 1999 Report Share Posted April 21, 1999 Hi Gizelle: Thought I'd add my 2c on this issue. This is a big one for me. As you probably know, this whole separation of mind and body is a characteristic of western thinking and therefore of Western medicine. But this view is not shared by Eastern thinking and therefore not shared by Eastern medicine. If you think about it, it would be impossible for any biological event to not have accompanying psychological component. After all, our brains are housed in our bodies. Likewise a psychological event would probably always have a biological component. It may be subtle. It may be as simple as when you get angry enough, your blood pressure goes up, even if you don't normally have high blood pressure. Would it make sense to say your high blood pressure reading is " in your head " ? This the wrong question really. Your blood vessels can and did constrict, you didnt " think " they did. In another scenario, from what I understand about vaginismus, it seems women with it have had some kind of trauma whether it be an acute incident of abuse, or ,vestibulitis or vulvadynia. Now, having been raped or abused or having vestibultis or vulvdynia are hardly the same. But they both affect one psychologcially, and the defensive contraction is a *physical* event connected to a *psychologcial event,* BUT it is also a *physical* event connected to a *physical* event. Then, it is also a psychological event connected to a biological/physical event, on moer than pne level, because having vaginismus becomes its own physical and psychological problem. So the way I see it, is there is no real way to determine when a psychological event begins or ends or overlap with a physical one, especially when dealing with sexual issues,because they are supposed to have a psychological component. Arousal, sex, pregnancy , childbirth are all important to women's lives. It would be virtually impossible to experience them normally without feeling anything. So if things go wrong, we are definitely going to feel things in a big, big way. I will wind down my rantings by saying that probably the reason the terms psychogenic vs psychosomatic don't appear clear is because no good physician would ever say *they* were clear on it. And the real kick in the head is, because of our culture, it is implied that a mental component is something *negative*. Traditional Eastern medicien, as I understand it at least, doesn't " go there " .Mind and body issues are addressed simultaneously, and, I suppose, with a good practicitioner, in the spirit of balance and compassion. Hope this helps. Or is at least interesting. : ) -- ==================== Thielke NuMuse Music Kensington, MD ts@... ==================== " Klattu...Burata......Nikto Klattu...Burata......Nikto Klattu...Burata......Nikto " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 21, 1999 Report Share Posted April 21, 1999 Hi Gizelle: Thought I'd add my 2c on this issue. This is a big one for me. As you probably know, this whole separation of mind and body is a characteristic of western thinking and therefore of Western medicine. But this view is not shared by Eastern thinking and therefore not shared by Eastern medicine. If you think about it, it would be impossible for any biological event to not have accompanying psychological component. After all, our brains are housed in our bodies. Likewise a psychological event would probably always have a biological component. It may be subtle. It may be as simple as when you get angry enough, your blood pressure goes up, even if you don't normally have high blood pressure. Would it make sense to say your high blood pressure reading is " in your head " ? This the wrong question really. Your blood vessels can and did constrict, you didnt " think " they did. In another scenario, from what I understand about vaginismus, it seems women with it have had some kind of trauma whether it be an acute incident of abuse, or ,vestibulitis or vulvadynia. Now, having been raped or abused or having vestibultis or vulvdynia are hardly the same. But they both affect one psychologcially, and the defensive contraction is a *physical* event connected to a *psychologcial event,* BUT it is also a *physical* event connected to a *physical* event. Then, it is also a psychological event connected to a biological/physical event, on moer than pne level, because having vaginismus becomes its own physical and psychological problem. So the way I see it, is there is no real way to determine when a psychological event begins or ends or overlap with a physical one, especially when dealing with sexual issues,because they are supposed to have a psychological component. Arousal, sex, pregnancy , childbirth are all important to women's lives. It would be virtually impossible to experience them normally without feeling anything. So if things go wrong, we are definitely going to feel things in a big, big way. I will wind down my rantings by saying that probably the reason the terms psychogenic vs psychosomatic don't appear clear is because no good physician would ever say *they* were clear on it. And the real kick in the head is, because of our culture, it is implied that a mental component is something *negative*. Traditional Eastern medicien, as I understand it at least, doesn't " go there " .Mind and body issues are addressed simultaneously, and, I suppose, with a good practicitioner, in the spirit of balance and compassion. Hope this helps. Or is at least interesting. : ) -- ==================== Thielke NuMuse Music Kensington, MD ts@... ==================== " Klattu...Burata......Nikto Klattu...Burata......Nikto Klattu...Burata......Nikto " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 1999 Report Share Posted April 22, 1999 Gizelle: I looked up the word psychogenic and it is defined as the following: psychogenic = produced or caused by psychic or mental factors rather than organic factors. There is a condition I have found listed in some books called " Scratch/Itch Syndrome " where women have some kind of problem causing them to itch and they scratch the area which in turn causes rawness, possible lesions and generalized discomfort. I agree with you completely, though, when you say that they need to figure out why they are scratching in the first place! Even if it is a psychological disturbance, like someone said (can't remember who at the moment, sorry!) - they should treat that anyway. Heidi mailto:dwalsh@... http://www.angelfire.com/md/vulvardisorders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.