Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: uk: In the dock: the man who caused the great MMR scare

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Oh, my God. This man is a saint, and they're crucifying him. He's in my prayers.

Liz

-------------- Original message ----------------------

From: binstock@...

> A risky move that may revive parents' fears Independent Porfolio Content

> http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article799461.ece

>

> * * * *

>

> In the dock: the man who caused the great MMR scare

>

> By nce, Health Editor

> Published: 12 June 2006

> http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article799541.ece

>

>

> The doctor who sparked an international scare over the safety of MMR

> vaccine is to be charged with serious professional misconduct by the

> General Medical Council in an attempt by the medical establishment finally

> to lay the controversy to rest.

>

> Wakefield, who published a research paper in 1998 purporting to

> show a link between the MMR vaccine and autism, is accused in preliminary

> charges of publishing " inadequately founded " research, failing to obtain

> ethical committee approval, obtaining funding " improperly " and of

> subjecting children to " unnecessary and invasive investigations " , The

> Independent has learnt. The research is said to have caused immunisation

> rates to slump and cases of measles, mumps and rubella to soar. The

> research, which appeared in The Lancet, is said to have done more damage

> than anything published in a scientific journal in living memory.

>

> Detailed charges are being formulated by the GMC's lawyers for

> presentation in the autumn and a public hearing is expected next year. If

> found guilty Dr Wakefield, 50, could be struck off the medical register.

>

> The GMC has brought the case itself in the public interest. There is no

> complainant. The investigation has taken two years and lawyers for Dr

> Wakefield say he and his family are suffering distress caused by the delay

> in bringing charges.

>

> The research was carried out at the Royal Free Hospital, north London, by

> Dr Wakefield and 12 other doctors and published in The Lancet in February

> 1998. The warning about the combined vaccine was amplified by Dr Wakefield

> at a press conference - to the disquiet of his colleagues present - and

> the subsequent scare led tens of thousands of parents to boycott the

> vaccine.

>

> Immunisation rates fell over the next five years from more than 90 per

> cent nationally to a low of 78.9 per cent in early 2003. In parts of

> London rates fell below 60 per cent. There was a resurgence in cases of

> the three diseases, including rubella (German measles), according to the

> Health Protection Agency. The number of cases of mumps soared from 4,204

> cases in 2003 to 16,436 in 2004 and to 56,390 cases last year.

>

> Since 2003 the MMR vaccination rate has increased slightly and in mid-2005

> stood at 83 per cent. A spokeswoman for the agency said: " The fear of

> Wakefield has dissipated a bit. The figures are coming back up. "

>

> In 2004 it emerged that at the time he was preparing The Lancet paper, Dr

> Wakefield was being paid by lawyers for parents of children allegedly

> damaged by the MMR vaccine to look for evidence that could be used to help

> take legal action against manufacturers of the vaccine.

>

> He received £55,000 from the Legal Aid Board, which was paid into his

> research fund but which he had not disclosed to his co-researchers. At

> least four of the 12 children in the Lancet study were also in the Legal

> Aid Board funded study. He was accused by The Lancet of failing to declare

> a conflict of interest that could have influenced his findings.

>

> Horton, the editor, declared the paper " fatally flawed " and said

> if he had known in 1998 about the conflict of interest he would never have

> published it. The journal partially withdrew the paper in February 2004

> and the following month 10 of the 12 authors withdrew the claim of a link

> with autism. Reid, the Health Secretary at the time, called on the

> GMC to hold an inquiry. Dr Wakefield, a consultant gastroenterologist,

> left the Royal Free Hospital in 2001 " by mutual agreement " . He has since

> worked mainly in America.

>

> The Government's chief medical officer, Sir Liam son, accused Dr

> Wakefield of mixing " spin and science " . But Jackie Flether of the support

> group Jabs, representing parents concerned about vaccination, said: " The

> GMC charges are totally unfounded and seem to be a total witch hunt

> against Wakefield and the research team. All the researchers did

> was raise a red flag [about MMR] and say more research was needed. " All

> the doctors are believed to have denied professional misconduct.

>

> The spread of a contagion of fear

>

> By Geneviève

>

> * FEBRUARY 1998: Wakefield's paper is published in The Lancet,

> linking the MMR triple vaccine with autism

>

> * 2000: Demand for single vaccines rises

>

> * JANUARY 2001: The Government rejects calls for a single measles vaccine

> on the NHS

>

> * 2001: MMR vaccinations fall to 84.2 per cent of children, down from 92

> per cent in 1996

>

> * EARLY 2003: Immunisation rates reach low of 78.9 per cent

>

> * NOVEMBER 2003: Dr Simon Murch says there is " unequivocal evidence that

> MMR is not a risk factor for autism "

>

> * 2004: It emerges that while preparing his Lancet paper, Dr Wakefield was

> being paid by lawyers for parents of children allegedly damaged by MMR

>

> * 2004: Immunisation rates rise to 81 per cent

>

> * 2004: Number of cases of mumps: 16,436, up from 4,204 the previous year.

> In 2005 the number is up to 56,390

>

> * MID-2005: Immunisation rates rise to 85 per cent

>

> * OCTOBER 2005: Cochrane Library says there is no credible evidence that

> MMR harms

>

> * APRIL 2006: A boy, 13, who had not received the MMR vaccine, becomes the

> first person to die of measles in 14 years

>

> The doctor who sparked an international scare over the safety of MMR

> vaccine is to be charged with serious professional misconduct by the

> General Medical Council in an attempt by the medical establishment finally

> to lay the controversy to rest.

>

> Wakefield, who published a research paper in 1998 purporting to

> show a link between the MMR vaccine and autism, is accused in preliminary

> charges of publishing " inadequately founded " research, failing to obtain

> ethical committee approval, obtaining funding " improperly " and of

> subjecting children to " unnecessary and invasive investigations " , The

> Independent has learnt. The research is said to have caused immunisation

> rates to slump and cases of measles, mumps and rubella to soar. The

> research, which appeared in The Lancet, is said to have done more damage

> than anything published in a scientific journal in living memory.

>

> Detailed charges are being formulated by the GMC's lawyers for

> presentation in the autumn and a public hearing is expected next year. If

> found guilty Dr Wakefield, 50, could be struck off the medical register.

>

> The GMC has brought the case itself in the public interest. There is no

> complainant. The investigation has taken two years and lawyers for Dr

> Wakefield say he and his family are suffering distress caused by the delay

> in bringing charges.

>

> The research was carried out at the Royal Free Hospital, north London, by

> Dr Wakefield and 12 other doctors and published in The Lancet in February

> 1998. The warning about the combined vaccine was amplified by Dr Wakefield

> at a press conference - to the disquiet of his colleagues present - and

> the subsequent scare led tens of thousands of parents to boycott the

> vaccine.

>

> Immunisation rates fell over the next five years from more than 90 per

> cent nationally to a low of 78.9 per cent in early 2003. In parts of

> London rates fell below 60 per cent. There was a resurgence in cases of

> the three diseases, including rubella (German measles), according to the

> Health Protection Agency. The number of cases of mumps soared from 4,204

> cases in 2003 to 16,436 in 2004 and to 56,390 cases last year.

>

> Since 2003 the MMR vaccination rate has increased slightly and in mid-2005

> stood at 83 per cent. A spokeswoman for the agency said: " The fear of

> Wakefield has dissipated a bit. The figures are coming back up. "

>

> In 2004 it emerged that at the time he was preparing The Lancet paper, Dr

> Wakefield was being paid by lawyers for parents of children allegedly

> damaged by the MMR vaccine to look for evidence that could be used to help

> take legal action against manufacturers of the vaccine.

>

> He received £55,000 from the Legal Aid Board, which was paid into his

> research fund but which he had not disclosed to his co-researchers. At

> least four of the 12 children in the Lancet study were also in the Legal

> Aid Board funded study. He was accused by The Lancet of failing to declare

> a conflict of interest that could have influenced his findings.

>

> Horton, the editor, declared the paper " fatally flawed " and said

> if he had known in 1998 about the conflict of interest he would never have

> published it. The journal partially withdrew the paper in February 2004

> and the following month 10 of the 12 authors withdrew the claim of a link

> with autism. Reid, the Health Secretary at the time, called on the

> GMC to hold an inquiry. Dr Wakefield, a consultant gastroenterologist,

> left the Royal Free Hospital in 2001 " by mutual agreement " . He has since

> worked mainly in America.

>

> The Government's chief medical officer, Sir Liam son, accused Dr

> Wakefield of mixing " spin and science " . But Jackie Flether of the support

> group Jabs, representing parents concerned about vaccination, said: " The

> GMC charges are totally unfounded and seem to be a total witch hunt

> against Wakefield and the research team. All the researchers did

> was raise a red flag [about MMR] and say more research was needed. " All

> the doctors are believed to have denied professional misconduct.

>

> The spread of a contagion of fear

>

> By Geneviève

>

> * FEBRUARY 1998: Wakefield's paper is published in The Lancet,

> linking the MMR triple vaccine with autism

>

> * 2000: Demand for single vaccines rises

>

> * JANUARY 2001: The Government rejects calls for a single measles vaccine

> on the NHS

>

> * 2001: MMR vaccinations fall to 84.2 per cent of children, down from 92

> per cent in 1996

>

> * EARLY 2003: Immunisation rates reach low of 78.9 per cent

>

> * NOVEMBER 2003: Dr Simon Murch says there is " unequivocal evidence that

> MMR is not a risk factor for autism "

>

> * 2004: It emerges that while preparing his Lancet paper, Dr Wakefield was

> being paid by lawyers for parents of children allegedly damaged by MMR

>

> * 2004: Immunisation rates rise to 81 per cent

>

> * 2004: Number of cases of mumps: 16,436, up from 4,204 the previous year.

> In 2005 the number is up to 56,390

>

> * MID-2005: Immunisation rates rise to 85 per cent

>

> * OCTOBER 2005: Cochrane Library says there is no credible evidence that

> MMR harms

>

> * APRIL 2006: A boy, 13, who had not received the MMR vaccine, becomes the

> first person to die of measles in 14 years

>

>

> *

>

> The material in this post is distributed without

> profit to those who have expressed a prior interest

> in receiving the included information for research

> and educational purposes.For more information go to:

> http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html

> http://oregon.uoregon.edu/~csundt/documents.htm

> If you wish to use copyrighted material from this

> email for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you

> must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

When Blaxill perused the backgrounds of the authors of the thimerosal's

OK and thimerosal's good for you articles, he found that each article

had a major tie to Pharma. In most such articles, the conflicts were not

disclosed in the publication of the articles.

tamgoddess@... wrote:

>Oh, my God. This man is a saint, and they're crucifying him. He's in my

prayers.

>

>Liz

> -------------- Original message ----------------------

>From: binstock@...

>

>

>>A risky move that may revive parents' fears Independent Porfolio Content

>>http://comment.independent.co.uk/leading_articles/article799461.ece

>>

>>* * * *

>>

>>In the dock: the man who caused the great MMR scare

>>

>>By nce, Health Editor

>>Published: 12 June 2006

>>http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/health_medical/article799541.ece

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...