Guest guest Posted February 9, 2004 Report Share Posted February 9, 2004 Neurologists call for elimination of TIA as diagnosis Last Updated: 2004-02-06 16:44:38 -0400 (Reuters Health) By Martha Kerr SAN DIEGO (Reuters Health) - A panel of neurologists presenting data here on transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) asserted on Friday that the diagnosis is misleading and can lead to the mismanagement of patients. These patients should all be considered stroke patients, they agreed. Dr. S. Claiborne ston of the University of California at San Francisco told attendees of the American Stroke Association's 29th International Stroke Conference that 24-hour hospitalization of TIA patients is cost-effective, since the risk of stroke during that time period is so high in these patients. The UCSF team analyzed the incremental cost of care for 24 hours of hospitalization of TIA patients evaluated in the emergency departments of 11 San Francisco Bay Area hospitals. They found that if patients were admitted, a new stroke could be identified within the first hour of onset and they could receive thrombolysis early in the therapeutic window. The result would be a minimization of sequelae and a shorter length of stay than patients sent home after resolution of TIA symptoms. The net cost would be $44,000 per quality of life years per patient if the TIA patient is admitted. " This is well within the range of what is considered cost-effective, not even considering the other benefits, such as a rapid work-up, " Dr. ston said. In a second study, the UCSF group found that the risk of stroke after first hospitalization for TIA was 5.6% in the first 48 hours and 11% at 90 days, Dr. ston said. Stroke incidence after TIA was 16.3% at 3 months, 18.4% at 6 months, 21.4% at one year and at 3 years 21.2%. " These numbers...are higher than previously published because all of these patents were hospitalized, " Dr. ston noted. " As you can see, TIAs are not benign. " " These [stroke] events are front-loaded, " panel moderator Dr. of the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta pointed out. " The [stroke] activity is much higher during the first 48 hours than during the first 60 days...These patients need to be kept in the system. We need to follow-up during the first 24 hours to determine the cause of the TIA. The patient needs a [neurological] work-up and referral for special consultation. " " I would admit every patient with TIA to the hospital, " said Dr. Orell Mielke of Neurologische Universitatsklinik of Klinikum Mannheim in Germany. He presented results of a 6-month follow-up of 1380 TIA patients and 3850 ischemic stroke patients. At the end of 6 months, 6.2% of TIA patients had died compared with 16.2% of stroke patients. Twenty-two percent of TIA patients were dependent compared with 41% of stroke patients. Risk of stroke during follow-up was almost the same in TIA patients and stroke patients-6.0% and 8.4%, respectively. " It makes no sense to separate TIA from stroke, " Dr. Mielke asserted. " TIAs and strokes are both accidents in the progression of the same disease. " Drs. and ston concurred. All three believe TIA is misleading as a diagnosis. Patients and many clinicians may be lulled into a sense of complacency when TIA symptoms disappear, the panelists said. " In fact, even though it sounds counterintuitive, TIA patients have an increased risk of deterioration and poor recovery with a stroke than stroke patients, " Dr. ston told Reuters Health. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.