Guest guest Posted January 25, 2004 Report Share Posted January 25, 2004 an 14, 2004 APS is an important predictor of mortality in SLE patients Bizkaia, Spain - Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Spanish researchers have confirmed. Reporting in the January 12, 2004 issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine [1], Dr Guillermo Ruiz-Irastorza (Hospital de Cruces, Bizkaia, Spain) and colleagues say their findings reinforce the recommendation for primary prevention of thrombosis in patients who have SLE and antiphospholipid antibodies. Ruiz-Irastorza, who runs a lupus clinic, told rheumawire: " Most of us in clinical practice know that APS is 1 of the most important determinants of progression in lupus, but there have not been many studies that have shown this. " The study was also important, he says, because most of the patients with APS did not receive preventive treatment for thrombosis, " so it's a good opportunity to look at the natural history of the disease. . . . We found that most of these patients, if they were left without treatment, would develop chronic organ damage. " " We found that most of these patients, if they were left without treatment, would develop chronic organ damage. " Currently, all patients with APS are given aspirin therapy of 75 mg to 100 mg per day, Ruiz-Irastorza explained, although a randomized trial is under way to see if adding warfarin to aspirintitrating to an INR of 1.5-1.8will be better than aspirin alone. And if patients do suffer a thrombotic event, the current recommendation is to give warfarin. However, there is some debate as to whether this should be low-intensity or high-intensity therapy (see discussion below). Long-term survival significantly worse in those with SLE and APS In their cohort of 202 patients with SLE, Ruiz-Irastorza et al found that 28 met the criteria for definite APSdefined as positive anticardiolipin antibodies and/or lupus anticoagulant plus documented obstetric and/or thrombotic complications. Mean follow-up was 9.7 years, and irreversible damagemeasured using the SLE International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index (SDI)was more severe in patients with APS than in those without (mean SDI score 2 vs 0 at 5 years; p<0.001; 4 vs 1 at 15 years; p<0.001). Cumulative survival at 15 years was also lower in patients with APS than in those without (65% vs 90%; p=0.03). Eight patients fulfilled the criteria for definite APS before dyingin 4 of these, thrombotic events were most likely the cause of death, the researchers say. Of the remaining 4, 2 died of cancer, 1 of legionella infection, and 1 committed suicide. " We found a strong effect of APS on mortality of patients with SLE, " confirming the results of a previous study [2] published 10 years ago, they say. And although the patients with APS were only 14% of the total cohort, " the difference in survival rates seen between groups. . . was high enough to reach statistical significance. Indeed, APS was identified as an independent risk factor for mortality, together with age and lupus nephritis, 2 well-known adverse prognostic variables in lupus. " " Antiphospholipid syndrome with thrombotic manifestations is a major predictor of irreversible organ damage and death in patients with SLE, " they conclude. Best warfarin regimen for those who have had a thrombotic event? Last year, a study published in the New England Journal of Medicineas reported by rheumawireshowed that high-intensity warfarin, with a target INR of more than 3.0, was not superior to a more moderate target of 2.0 to 3.0 in preventing recurrent thrombosis among patients with APS and previous thrombosis [3]. " At least some patients with APS should receive high-intensity warfarin therapy. " But Ruiz-Irastorza told rheumawire he was not convinced by these resultsmost of the patients in this study had suffered a venous thrombosis rather than the more serious arterial thrombosis, he notes. " At least some patients with APS should receive high-intensity warfarin therapy, " he believes. " Obviously, I analyze patients on an individual basis, but as a general rule, if they have suffered an arterial event, I would rather titrate them to an INR of 3.0 or more, rather than less than 3.0. " Nainggolan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.