Guest guest Posted April 5, 2004 Report Share Posted April 5, 2004 This is a delightful result for Aventis, but not the consumer. It's not just Public Citizen who has a serious concern about Arava.What these " all clear " articles on the FDA Arava decision conveniently fail to mention is that researchers at the Office of Drug Safety (part of the FDA but distinct from the Arthritis Advisory Committee) came up with a 37-page report in which they justified their conclusion that Arava should be withdrawn from the market. Curiously, they weren't allowed to present their interpretation of the data at the final meeting! Aventis and their lawyers and marketers were allowed to go on and on, but the researchers were told to keep quiet. Since insurance companies would rather pay for Arava than for Enbrel, Remicade, Humira, or Kineret, Aventis has a nice little niche - those patients who fail MTX and haven't moved up to biologics yet. All those sales dollars will surely cover the cost of any lawsuits brought by the patients who suffer severe liver injury or the loved ones of those who die from liver failure. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org [ ] Arava stays on US market: FDA formally denies Public Citizenpetition Apr 2, 2004 Arava stays on US market: FDA formally denies Public Citizen petition Washington DC - The cloud that has been hanging over leflunomide (Arava®, Aventis) in the US has finally cleared, with the FDA's formal denial of the petition mounted against the drug by the Public Citizen consumer group. The group had been campaigning to remove the drug from the US market because of safety concerns, mainly liver toxicity. In a letter sent to the group last week, the FDA said that after a thorough evaluation of all the available data, it had concluded that the benefits of the drug outweigh its risks. " Arava's continued availability is important and justified, " the agency added. The FDA stance mirrors the conclusions reached by its Arthritis Advisory Committee at a meeting in March last year, at which it considered the Public Citizen petition. As reported at the time by rheumawire, the committee members unanimously concluded that the benefit-to-risk profile for Arava is acceptable for its current indications. The committee also voted to recommend approval of an expanded indication for improvement in physical function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, which was subsequently approved by the FDA. This latest stepthe letter the agency sent to the consumer group represents a formal denial of the petition and should mark the end of the saga. Yesterday, the manufacturer, Aventis, welcomed the move. " We are pleased that the FDA has denied the petition and that Arava will continue to be available to patients in the US who need it, " said Dr Francois Nader (senior vice president, medical affairs, Aventis North America). " Arava is a much-needed drug among the limited number of rheumatoid arthritis therapies, and it is an important option for physician choice and patient care. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.