Guest guest Posted March 18, 2004 Report Share Posted March 18, 2004 Rheumawire Mar 16, 2004 Biologically regenerated meniscal repair may soon trump resection San Francisco, CA - New research is paving the way toward biological regeneration of the meniscus, according to Dr A Sgaglione (North Shore University Hospital, Manhasset, NY). Sgaglione made his comments Friday at the 71st annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. " Currently there are 9 resections to every 1 repair, as an overwhelming number of physicians continue to remove the meniscus rather than repair it, but we are on the cusp of an explosion in technology, " he says. " In 5 to 10 years, the solution will be biological. " This change in thought is predominantly driven by an aging yet increasingly fit population, he says. " Today patients have great expectations. They say, 'I am 50 years old, and I really like to ski. I know that my lifespan might be 25 more years and I want my knee fixed!' " In the past, 50-year-old patients may have been content to put up with the problem knee and were more sedentary. One potential promising solution is using fibrin clots to hold sutures in place and promote healing. " The most realistic and promising of the technologies is the use of autoglous platelet-rich plasma [because] it allows you to carry out a 1-step technique in the operating room at the time of surgery using a patient's own blood, if [you] somehow concentrate it and amplify healing, " he tells rheumawire. This is more practical than genetic engineering, he says. The blood is spun for about 17 minutes to concentrate the platelets and then placed in the knee during arthroscopy, he explains. This technology has an 89% success rate, according to a study of 29 patients with an average age of 22 who were followed for 2 years, he says. Another promising meniscal-preservation technology involves borrowing ideas from the cardiology community. Instead of coated stents used by cardiologists, orthopedic surgeons can use sutures coated with angiogenic chemicals to promote healing, he says. " If we can borrow [this idea] and use bioactice sutures, we can repair more tears, " he says. There is also some work being done in gene-modified tissue engineering using such bioactive factors as insulinlike growth factor (IGF-1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). " VEGF is very potent but very difficult to control in a lab or in vivo because of its half life, and it will cause very exuberant responses such as excessive tissue formation, which is in essence a scar, " he says. Currently surgeons do use allograft tissue, but novel scaffolds can be improved on, he says. The collagen meniscal implant (CMI) (ReGen Biologics, lin Lakes, NJ) and the porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) scaffold (DePuy Biologics, Warsaw, IN) may have a role in the future. The CMI is approved in Europe, Chile, and Australia, and a ruling is anticipated from the US FDA in early 2005. The porcine SIS is behind the CMI in approval status, but " so far in preclinical models in dog knees, promising results have been seen with good healing, " he says. " Despite excitement and novel technologies, there are problems ahead, including durability with construct, and we are in our infancy in controlling dosing, scheduling, release, and half life of many chemicals, " Sgaglione says. Plus, he says, " With chondoprotection, are we really making a difference? That is our holy grail. " Cost-effectiveness, too, needs to be determined. Mann I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.