Re: TERM EN>IT Non-Catheterization Lab

[Guest guest]

Just in case you don't get any useful info from the client - I would try

to get away with something like Cardiovascular Catheterization Lab

versus Other Cardiovascular Lab....

HTH,

_______________________

Janda

En-Czech Translations & Interpreting

Medicine, IT/SW, Law,

Dne 10.2.2012 12:31, Graham Cole napsal(a):

>

>>

>> Dear all,

>>

>> I cannot find a valid translation into IT for " Non-catheterization

>> Lab " . The context is this " Considering the Cardiovascular X-Ray Power

>> Injector systems installed at your facility, how many of these systems

>> are used in a Cardiovascular Catheterization Lab versus

>> Non-Catheterization Lab? "

>>

>> Can someone help me considering that the first one is " sala di

>> emodinamica "

>>

>> Thanks

>> Beatrice

>>

> I just wonder if they meant to say " non-invasive catheterization

> laboratory " that does at least generate a few hits, however I agree it's

> not very clear and I would ask for clarification of what is meant.

>

> Graham

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

THanks a lot for your ideas. Unfortunately I didn't find any valid support so I

decided to translate " sala non attrezzata per interventi di cateterismo " ,

considering that the few occurrences explaining this lab made me think in this

way. I delivered and I asked the proofreader to double check my solution.

Best,

Beatrice

> >>

> >> Dear all,

> >>

> >> I cannot find a valid translation into IT for " Non-catheterization

> >> Lab " . The context is this " Considering the Cardiovascular X-Ray Power

> >> Injector systems installed at your facility, how many of these systems

> >> are used in a Cardiovascular Catheterization Lab versus

> >> Non-Catheterization Lab? "

> >>

> >> Can someone help me considering that the first one is " sala di

> >> emodinamica "

> >>

> >> Thanks

> >> Beatrice

> >>

> > I just wonder if they meant to say " non-invasive catheterization

> > laboratory " that does at least generate a few hits, however I agree it's

> > not very clear and I would ask for clarification of what is meant.

> >

> > Graham

> >

> >

> >