Re: AW: DE>EN Tumorart and Tumorentität TNX

[Guest guest]

The PM has come up with the article and lo and behold, problem solved on

page 1!!! (Did she have it all along????!!!! Is this a test of ingenuity?)

The very first table shows as follows:

Tumorart:

hämatologisch

solide

Tumorentität:

Mammakarzinom

NHL

Bronchialkarzinom

So I think I'll keep " type of tumour " for the haematological versus

solid distinction and perhaps use " type of neoplasia " (as 's

link suggests), for the other term. Anyone see any objections to that? I

think it'll fit everywhere I've seen so far.

Thanks so much for all your help. Much appreciated.

Margaret

[Guest guest]

I do, sorry ...

" type of tumour " and " type of neoplasia " mean the same thing.

To some extent, this supports my suggestion to use 'location'.

> The PM has come up with the article and lo and behold, problem solved on

> page 1!!! (Did she have it all along????!!!! Is this a test of ingenuity?)

>

> The very first table shows as follows:

>

> Tumorart:

> hämatologisch

> solide

>

> Tumorentität:

>

> Mammakarzinom

> NHL

> Bronchialkarzinom

>

> So I think I'll keep " type of tumour " for the haematological versus

> solid distinction and perhaps use " type of neoplasia " (as 's

> link suggests), for the other term. Anyone see any objections to that? I

> think it'll fit everywhere I've seen so far.

>

> Thanks so much for all your help. Much appreciated.

>

> Margaret

>

[Guest guest]

Le 17/04/2012 13:58, kinory@... a écrit :

> I do, sorry ...

> " type of tumour " and " type of neoplasia " mean the same thing.

I see your point , and in fact should have written just " neoplasia "

for " Tumorentität " - I just wanted a synonym for tumour, really. It is

pretty obvious to anyone who may be reading this article if it is ever

translated, what the difference between the 2 DE terms is: they are

explained in the same way I quoted in my last message in all the

relevant tables.

I'll keep pondering though, till I've finished.

Margaret

[Guest guest]

In some extent, too :-), I agree with .

I totally agree that " type of tumour/of neoplasia " are real synonyms,

and even if I don't understand DE, I understand that in the first

instance they speak of tumour " category " = solide versus liquid, and in

the other instances, of specific tumour " types " as breast cancer, lung

carcinoma, etc.

In FR, I wouldn't hesitate to use " catégorie " and " type " , according to

the content of the descriptions, as explained above.

Hope this helps

Le 17/04/2012 13:58, kinory@... a écrit :

> I do, sorry ...

> " type of tumour " and " type of neoplasia " mean the same thing.

> To some extent, this supports my suggestion to use 'location'.

>

>

>

>> The PM has come up with the article and lo and behold, problem solved on

>> page 1!!! (Did she have it all along????!!!! Is this a test of ingenuity?)

>>

>> The very first table shows as follows:

>>

>> Tumorart:

>> hämatologisch

>> solide

>>

>> Tumorentität:

>>

>> Mammakarzinom

>> NHL

>> Bronchialkarzinom

>>

>> So I think I'll keep " type of tumour " for the haematological versus

>> solid distinction and perhaps use " type of neoplasia " (as 's

>> link suggests), for the other term. Anyone see any objections to that? I

>> think it'll fit everywhere I've seen so far.

>>

>> Thanks so much for all your help. Much appreciated.

>>

>> Margaret

>>

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------

>

> URL: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/medical_translation

>

> In case of any problem with this list, you can reach the moderator at

cgtradmed@....

> The FAQs of our list are available at :

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/medical_translation/files/M_T-FAQS.doc

>

> To unsubscribe, please send an *empty* message to

> medical_translation-UNSUBSCRIBE@...! Groups Links

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Category vs. Type seems like an excellent solution (even though someone is

now sure to quibble that category and type are synonyms ...).

> In some extent, too :-), I agree with .

>

> I totally agree that " type of tumour/of neoplasia " are real synonyms,

> and even if I don't understand DE, I understand that in the first

> instance they speak of tumour " category " = solide versus liquid, and in

> the other instances, of specific tumour " types " as breast cancer, lung

> carcinoma, etc.

>

> In FR, I wouldn't hesitate to use " catégorie " and " type " , according to

> the content of the descriptions, as explained above.

>

> Hope this helps

>

>

> Le 17/04/2012 13:58, kinory@... a écrit :

>> I do, sorry ...

>> " type of tumour " and " type of neoplasia " mean the same thing.

>> To some extent, this supports my suggestion to use 'location'.

>>

>>

>>

>>> The PM has come up with the article and lo and behold, problem solved

>>> on

>>> page 1!!! (Did she have it all along????!!!! Is this a test of

>>> ingenuity?)

>>>

>>> The very first table shows as follows:

>>>

>>> Tumorart:

>>> hämatologisch

>>> solide

>>>

>>> Tumorentität:

>>>

>>> Mammakarzinom

>>> NHL

>>> Bronchialkarzinom

>>>

>>> So I think I'll keep " type of tumour " for the haematological versus

>>> solid distinction and perhaps use " type of neoplasia " (as 's

>>> link suggests), for the other term. Anyone see any objections to that?

>>> I

>>> think it'll fit everywhere I've seen so far.

>>>

>>> Thanks so much for all your help. Much appreciated.

>>>

>>> Margaret

>>>

>>

>>

>>

>> ------------------------------------

>>

>> URL: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/medical_translation

>>

>> In case of any problem with this list, you can reach the moderator at

>> cgtradmed@....

>> The FAQs of our list are available at :

>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/medical_translation/files/M_T-FAQS.doc

>>

>> To unsubscribe, please send an *empty* message to

>> medical_translation-UNSUBSCRIBE@...! Groups Links

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>

>