Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Ger>Eng: Neueinstellung & age calculation inconsistency?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Die Anzahl der Patienten >= 65 Jahren in the Phase III-Studien is zu gering.

Daher ergibt die Wirksamkeitsanalyse kein einheitliches und auswertbares Bild

und " Neueinstellungen " (die nicht ein Weiterfuehren bereits vor dem 65 [sic,

i.e. not 65.] Lebensjahr begonnener Therapie mit Response darstellen) sollten

nicht begonnen werden.

1. Neueinstellungen = new titrations? or entirely new prescriptions?

2. The 65th Lebensjahr starts at age 64, not age 65. This conflicts with >= 65

Jahren, which starts at age 65. Is it them, or me?

Thanks,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...