Guest guest Posted September 16, 2006 Report Share Posted September 16, 2006 " We found that for every 1000 pounds of mercury released by industry, there was a 17 percent increase in autism, " Palmer tells WebMD. ... http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,151065,00.html - 29k - - - - Environmental mercury release, special education rates, and. autism disorder: an ecological study of Texas. F. Palmer. a,. Ã. , Blanchard ... http://www.safeminds.org/research/library/Palmer-et-al-Texas-Autism-Mercury-Link\ ..pdf - - - - EcoWellness: Elemental dangers? By CHRISTINE DELL'AMORE UPI Consumer Health Correspondent http://www.upi.com/ConsumerHealthDaily/view.php?StoryID=20060915-053012-7538r WASHINGTON, Sept. 15 (UPI) -- People who inhale tiny metal particles contained in air pollutants may be more likely to develop lung cancer, an epidemiological study has shown. In a study of lung-cancer cases in Texas, researchers found an association between exposure to metals in airborne particulate matter and incidence of adenocarcinoma lung cancer, a type of cancer that often afflicts non-smoking women. " This type of research gives us an idea of what might be causing lung cancer in women, particularly those who don't smoke, " said senior author Dr. Coyle, an associate professor of internal medicine at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas. The large-scale study, the first of its kind, was published in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology. Coyle and colleagues identified more than 80,000 lung-cancer cases from 1995 to 2000 in 254 Texas counties and compared them with data of industrial air pollution reported to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency between 1988 and 2000. The cancer rates were more prevalent in counties with the highest levels of pollution; conversely, cancer rates were lower in counties with less pollution. However, Coyle and colleagues' research is still preliminary, and the link between airborne metals and cancer is not yet conclusive. Particulate matter, tiny particles of dirt, dust and water, settle into the atmosphere from fossil-fuel burning usually related to industrial processes or automobile driving. The smallest type of particles, called PM2.5 (which refers to 2.5 micrometers, a size 100 times thinner than a human hair) contain heavy metals, and previous research has shown they may contribute to lung cancer. The EPA sets limits on how much PM can be emitted as one of its six criteria pollutants under the Clean Air Act. Every five years the agency updates the standards; the next revision is due in 2009. Although PM2.5's deleterious effects are well known, Coyle wanted to look at the tiny bits of metals inside the particles -- namely, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, cobalt, copper, zinc, nickel and vanadium. Coyle selected these for analysis because of their ability to mimic estrogen, their relatively high concentration in PM and their inclusion into EPA data. After she conducted a statistical analysis, Coyle found strong associations between copper, chromium and zinc and lung cancer. After further analyses, zinc, an essential nutrient in the body, came out on top as the greatest risk factor. It may sound strange than an essential nutrient such as zinc -- popular in multivitamin tablets -- could be so detrimental. But Coyle said some nutrients, when excessive, can have toxic consequences. It could be the Texans in the study were inhaling too much of the metal from outside air, which in turn led to their cancer. Coyle speculates the metals are especially carcinogenic in women because of their estrogenic effects, or ability to bind to estrogen receptors in the lung tissue. Many other substances, both natural and manmade, trick the body into believing it is processing estrogen, a hormone that can be carcinogenic. Furthermore, women often do not have the ability to metabolize carcinogens as well as men. Some studies suggest women can combat this deficiency by eating fruits and vegetables and exercising to reduce the amount of metals in the body. The research team adjusted for sex, race and ethnicity and urbanization to ensure these factors did not complicate their results. Although smoking is the overriding cause of lung cancer, Coyle notes smoking prevalence was similar for all the counties regardless of their rates of pollution. However, the research team was not able to determine how much the lung-cancer patients were exposed to PM, a weakness inherent in observational studies, Coyle said. She plans to measure the amount of metals in individuals in future studies. Lung cancer is the No. 1 cause of cancer deaths in American men and women, claiming about 160,000 lives a year. Smoking causes 87 percent of cases, and radon, a gas present in many homes and office buildings, is thought to make up 12 percent. Genes also play a part: Some people may have a genetic makeup more or less susceptible to lung cancer. Yet scientists believe other environmental carcinogens, in addition to cigarette smoke, may be influencing lung cancer as well. Dr. Samet, chair of epidemiology at the s Hopkins University School of Public Health, said metals and particulate matter is an area with promising leads for follow-up, although the early studies, such as Coyle and colleagues', are exploratory and not conclusive. " It's another one of those small steps along the way in understanding the specific carcinogens of lung cancer, " said Samet, a leading expert in tobacco smoke and its effect on lung cancer. Even so, Coyle believes the EPA should consider the research as additional evidence of how PM can damage human health. The study should also reinforce the trend of eliminating secondhand smoke -- also a carcinogen -- from public places. " Cleaning up our air and water is what we should be striving for, " Coyle said. " It's not enough to ask people to exercise and eat a certain diet (when) our environment is dirty. " -- To see how much pollution is in your county, go to: http://www.epa.gov/tri © Copyright 2006 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved The material in this post is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.For more information go to: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html http://oregon.uoregon.edu/~csundt/documents.htm If you wish to use copyrighted material from this email for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.