Guest guest Posted May 2, 2004 Report Share Posted May 2, 2004 Rheumawire Apr 21, 2004 Methionine supplement equivalent to celecoxib in OA Orange, CA - A popular dietary supplement consisting of S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) was found to be as effective as celecoxib (Celebrex®, Pfizer) in the management of symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in a study that followed 56 patients for 16 weeks. Although it had a slower onset of action, with significantly less pain relief than celecoxib in the first month of treatment, by the second month the 2 compounds were " clinically equivalent, " say the researchers, Dr Wadie Najm and colleagues (University of California, Irvine). The study is published online in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders [1]. The supplement is " helpful for the management of pain in osteoarthritis and demonstrates similar effectiveness as a currently accepted COX-2 inhibitor, " they conclude. First discovered in Italy in 1952, SAMe has been used in Europe for some time, often as a prescription product, but it has also become a popular dietary supplement in the US. SAMe is reported to be effective in the management of depression, liver disease, and arthritis. In 2002, the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (part of the Department of Health and Human Services) reviewed the evidence for these claims. For osteoarthritis, on the basis of 13 clinical trials, it concluded that SAMe was better than placebo and not different from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) at relieving pain [2]. " SAMe is an important physiologic compound that is distributed throughout the body tissues and fluids, " Najm et al comment. It acts as a methyl group donor and plays an essential role in many biochemical reactions involving enzymatic transmethylation, eg, in the biosynthesis of phospholipids essential for the integrity of cell membranes. Nevertheless, despite this understanding of its role in the body, its mechanism of action in disease is unclear, the authors comment. In OA, there is evidence that it may play a role in reducing inflammation, increasing proteoglycan synthesis, or by having an analgesic effect, they add. Although it is now used orally, SAMe was in the past administered intravenously because of stability problems, which do not appear to have been altogether solved. For instance, in this current trial, when about 75% completed, a routine quality check of a random sample of the study medications indicated that SAMe had lost approximately 51% of its potency, and the study was delayed until a new batch of SAMe could be obtained. The study participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 sequences, receiving either SAMe 600 mg bid for 8 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout period, and then celecoxib 100 mg bid for 8 weeks, or the other way around. Pain was assessed on 2 visual analog scales: patients were asked to rate the pain they felt that day and also the pain they had felt over the past month. After 1 month, celecoxib showed significantly more reduction in pain than SAMe (p=0.024), but after the second month of treatment, there was no significant difference between the 2 medications (p<0.01), and both groups were significantly improved from baseline. The patients who initially took celecoxib and then the supplement were " noticeably but not significantly worse " than the group that shifted from the supplement to celecoxib after the first month of treatment, the authors note, but there were no apparent differences at the end of the second month. Both compounds showed a notable improvement from baseline on most functional health measures (including overall health, physical fitness, emotional well-being), with no significant differences between the 2. Isometric joint-function tests appeared to be steadily improving over the entire study period regardless of treatment, the authors write. Both groups showed significant improvements in tenderness in the knee, swelling in the knee, pain during walking, and in pain frequency. The most common adverse effects were gastrointestinal disorders (reported by 4 patients taking SAMe and 6 taking celecoxib), anxiety (5 vs 4), and dyspepsia (1 vs 3); none of these differences was significant. One patient terminated the study due to headache 3 days into the SAMe phase, but this patient had a well-known history of such headaches before enrolling in the study, the researchers comment. " Our results indicate that SAMe is equivalent in almost all measures to COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib) in relieving pain and improving function in subjects with osteoarthritis of the knee, " Najm et al conclude. " It is clear from our results that SAMe has a slower onset of action, requiring almost 1 month of treatment prior to achieving similar effect to celecoxib, " the researchers continue. In this, the COX-2 inhibitors and other NSAIDs have " a definite advantage during the first month of treatment, " they comment. However, after the second month of treatment, the pain-relieving effect was equivalent for both drugs, and it is interesting to note that, while the pain relief of celecoxib was constant throughout the study, the effect of SAMe continued to increase with time, the authors comment. " This raises the question of whether the effect of SAMe would have continued to improve had the study been for a longer period of time. " Also, the data suggest that the pain relief with SAMe persisted even after the medication was discontinued, they observe. " In this study, we noted that subjects who changed from SAMe to celecoxib had an initial decline in their pain level. " This initial dip beyond the baseline pain relief obtained by celecoxib alone, while not significant, hints at a possible persistent effect of SAMe for 1 month beyond discontinuation of the medication, they say. " This is reminiscent of reports on the pain-relieving effect observed with glucosamine sulfate, " they comment. If this result could be reproduced in future large studies, it may be possible to use SAMe as a pulsed therapy for the management of pain in OA, after an initial period to establish a steady level. Further studies are needed, as there are many questions left unanswered about this supplement, Najm et al conclude. As well as establishing optimal dose and mechanism of action, it would be worth exploring whether the combination of SAMe with a COX-2 inhibitor is more effective than either alone in the management of osteoarthritis. Zosia Chustecka Sources 1. Najm WI, Reinsch S, Hoehler F, et al. S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) versus celecoxib for the treatment of osteoarthritis symptoms: a double-blind cross-over trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/5/6. 2. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 64. S-Adenosylmethionine for treatment of depression, osteoarthritis and liver disease. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ Publication No. 02-E033]. August 2002. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/samesum.htm. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.