Guest guest Posted May 10, 2004 Report Share Posted May 10, 2004 Hiya ! Ok-I have a question and I KNOW you will have probably multiple links with an answer. As you know, the Remicade works pretty well for me. But in spite of the fact it makes me feel better and decreases the swelling and all that jazz, I think I am starting to see more ulnar deviation in my right hand. It also seems like the knuckles that are the worst don't ever go completely " down " anymore. So my question (which I will also ask my rheumy) is, is progression inevitable, and the treatments just delay it? Or should my treatment be stopping the damage in it's tracks? I guess I'm not sure how much to expect, and what I just should accept. At this rate, I'll still end up on disability eventually, even if the Remicade seems to be working. Thanks in advance for the info I know you'll have! Cary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 12, 2004 Report Share Posted May 12, 2004 Cary, you've asked a couple of tricky questions for which there are no perfect answers. So much is still unknown. It wasn't that long ago that rheumatologists used the " pyramid " strategy for treating RA - start with no drugs or the mildest drugs and do a lot of " wait and see " and slowly move up to DMARDs if necessary. Not only is escalating the treatment required more often than not, the damage sustained in the meanwhile is often permanent. From what we do know now, the pyramid isn't a good idea. RA is viewed as a progressive disease for most who have it - the damage will continue to occur and at a faster rate with more complications for most of those who do not try to counteract the inflammation with DMARDs. Why wait until the damage is done before trying the most powerful treatments? Then what? Also, the body as a whole suffers from the effects of systemic inflammation that goes unchecked. RA impacts so much more than the joints. Remission can't be predicted and is unusual in the absence of DMARD therapy. Overall, the toxicity risks of DMARDs are less than the danger of allowing the inflammation to rage. In your case, I would not accept anything less than trying to stop your RA " in its tracks. " Today, one will often see the concept of " no evidence of disease (NED) " being touted as the goal of RA treatment. I believe this is the correct view. Halting the disease, not just toning it down is what we should be shooting for. Obviously, we aren't at the point where we can reliably achieve remission, but we should exhaust all available options to attempt it. If the Remicade isn't fully effective, and it seems from what you say that it isn't, maybe you should consider a higher dosage or more frequent infusions. Or perhaps switching to Enbrel + MTX or Humira + MTX would be a good idea. Rituximab attacks the problem from a different angle, and I believe it is a very promising RA therapy. There is no guarantee the meds will work, but at least trying to stop or slow the damage is essential. Better treatments are being developed, and the current ones may be just enough to tide you over without allowing too much cumulative damage to occur until better DMARDs are available. I'm sending some information for you and the group on the topic in a separate post. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org [ ] -question for your research magic > Hiya ! > Ok-I have a question and I KNOW you will have probably multiple links with an > answer. As you know, the Remicade works pretty well for me. But in spite of > the fact it makes me feel better and decreases the swelling and all that > jazz, I think I am starting to see more ulnar deviation in my right hand. It also > seems like the knuckles that are the worst don't ever go completely " down " > anymore. So my question (which I will also ask my rheumy) is, is progression > inevitable, and the treatments just delay it? Or should my treatment be > stopping the damage in it's tracks? I guess I'm not sure how much to expect, and > what I just should accept. At this rate, I'll still end up on disability > eventually, even if the Remicade seems to be working. Thanks in advance for the info > I know you'll have! Cary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.