Guest guest Posted May 30, 2004 Report Share Posted May 30, 2004 I wish we could send this to every doctor. It is amazing how many doctors know very little about rheumatic diseases. a On 5/30/04 12:16 AM, " " <Matsumura_Clan@...> wrote: > Medscape > Introduction to Rheumatic Diseases > > > Key Concept/Objective: To understand that immunologic tests are not > useful as screening tests. > > > As a class, immunologic tests have low specificity and only moderate > sensitivity. They are more expensive than other clinical laboratory > tests, and the results are less reproducible. Immunologic tests should > never be used as screening tests; their greatest utility occurs when the > pretest probability of disease is high. The misuse of immunologic tests > frequently confounds the diagnosis and leads to unnecessary rheumatology > referrals. The use of so-called arthritis panels, in which many > serologic tests are bundled together, increases the likelihood of an > abnormal test result occurring in a patient without rheumatic disease; > such panels should be avoided. It is common for young women to test > positive for ANA; approximately 32% of young women will test positive > for ANA at low titers. A positive ANA in and of itself is by no means > diagnostic of systemic lupus erythematosus. The probability of testing > positive for rheumatoid factor increases with age even in healthy > persons. Additionally, conditions other than rheumatoid arthritis can be > associated with elevations in rheumatoid factor; because of this, a > positive test result for rheumatoid factor is not diagnostic of > rheumatoid arthritis. A careful and detailed history is the most > important part of the evaluation of a patient with arthritis. Laboratory > findings should be evaluated in the context of the information obtained > by a detailed history and physical examination. Diagnoses of rheumatic > diseases should not be based solely on the findings of immunologic > tests. > > > http://www.medscape.com/content/2003/00/46/35/463550/ans8.html > > > > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2004 Report Share Posted May 30, 2004 a, I agree with you, and so would my oncologist! He was very interested in the fact that the biggest reaction I had to the Interferon was in all my joints! I felt like I was literally being torn apart from the inside out, and my hips, elbows, knees, and knuckles were hot, even when I got to the doctor on Monday. He could not explain it, and my sed rate was only slightly elevated. The only explanation he could give is that " Dercum's is autoimmune, but it may take years to find out what the mechanism is. " Oh goody. Judi > > > Medscape > > Introduction to Rheumatic Diseases > > > > > > Key Concept/Objective: To understand that immunologic tests are not > > useful as screening tests. > > > > > > As a class, immunologic tests have low specificity and only moderate > > sensitivity. They are more expensive than other clinical laboratory > > tests, and the results are less reproducible. Immunologic tests should > > never be used as screening tests; their greatest utility occurs when the > > pretest probability of disease is high. The misuse of immunologic tests > > frequently confounds the diagnosis and leads to unnecessary rheumatology > > referrals. The use of so-called arthritis panels, in which many > > serologic tests are bundled together, increases the likelihood of an > > abnormal test result occurring in a patient without rheumatic disease; > > such panels should be avoided. It is common for young women to test > > positive for ANA; approximately 32% of young women will test positive > > for ANA at low titers. A positive ANA in and of itself is by no means > > diagnostic of systemic lupus erythematosus. The probability of testing > > positive for rheumatoid factor increases with age even in healthy > > persons. Additionally, conditions other than rheumatoid arthritis can be > > associated with elevations in rheumatoid factor; because of this, a > > positive test result for rheumatoid factor is not diagnostic of > > rheumatoid arthritis. A careful and detailed history is the most > > important part of the evaluation of a patient with arthritis. Laboratory > > findings should be evaluated in the context of the information obtained > > by a detailed history and physical examination. Diagnoses of rheumatic > > diseases should not be based solely on the findings of immunologic > > tests. > > > > > > http://www.medscape.com/content/2003/00/46/35/463550/ans8.html > > > > > > > > > > I'll tell you where to go! > > > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > > > s Hopkins Medicine > > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.