Guest guest Posted November 5, 2004 Report Share Posted November 5, 2004 US FDA approves first-ever artificial disk for spine arthroplasty Rheumawire Nov 3, 2004 Mann Plano, TX - The US FDA has approved the first ever-artificial disk for spine arthroplasty, the SB Charite III (DePuy Spine/ & , Raynham, MA). Offering an alternative to spine fusion, this new approval heralds the start of a revolution in treatment offered to patients with chronic back pain, an expert tells rheumawire. Consisting of a polyethylene core that slides between 2 metal end plates, this new artificial disk " is truly a revolution in regard to how people will be treated, " says Dr Hochschuler (Texas Back Institute, Plano), who conducted some of the studies that led to the FDA approval. " This will give us an alternative to spinal fusion, but it's not for every case, [and] in the past many new technologies have been overutilized. " The hope is that artificial disks like the Charite may avoid postfusion problems, he says. " We hypothesize that if we don't fuse, there will be fewer changes on the disks above and below the fusion site as well less destruction and less future surgery above and below this site. " This disk should be used only in patients with significantly more back pain then leg pain, he says. " They must have tried at least 6 months of other treatment, including physical therapy, diet, injection(s), or bracing, and really all sorts of things to get someone over the pain and avoid surgery, " he says. " I personally have a back problem, and no one is operating on me unless it's the last choice. " The clinical trials that led to the approval were conducted with patients aged 20 to 60, he says, and this remains the basic age range of potential candidates. Patients with significant osteoporosis, who are pregnant, or who have any infections are also not good candidates for arthroplasty with Charite. " There is a learning curve [to using the Charite], " he says. Specifically, DePuy Spine/ & will require all surgeons to go through " rigorous didactic and hands-on training, " he tells rheumawire. As a matter of fact, the first group of students will be the board of directors of the North American Spine Society, he says. " It's really kind of hot, " he says. " Many surgeons are working on other disks that are not approved, so it behooves us to teach them how to use the Charite so they can deal with demand, " he says. " The training is a day and a half for surgeons who have done anterior spinal surgery before, " he says. " The biggest problem when going through the front to get the spine is that this approach can be fraught with danger [because you must maneuver around many vital organs], " he says. " At Texas Back, we have done thousands of anterior approaches, and vascular surgeons get us there in 5 to 7 minutes safely, " he says. It's not just spine surgeons but also the vascular surgeons who need to be educated, he says. Typically, 2 surgeons are needed for the artificial-disk operation. A general surgeon approaches the spine through an abdominal incision, and a spine surgeon then removes the damaged disk and creates space for implantationfirst the 2 end plates and then the core in the middle, through the use of specialized instruments. The 2 end plates (made of a cobalt chromium alloy) are pressed into the vertebrae above and below the disk space, and teeth along the border of the end plate grip the bone. A polyethylene core is then placed between the end plates. The procedure can take 60 to 90 minutes. " If a person has a huge ruptured disk in their back and we have to go in through their back, we don't want to go in through their front and remove another disk because it's not necessary, " Hochschuler says. Rheumawire reported earlier on the data leading up to FDA approval. In a 2-year study, patients implanted with the Charite disk improved more quickly than those who underwent fusion surgery. Moreover, patients who received the artificial disk scored higher on pain and function scores compared with fusion patients [1]. Patients in the Charite group were also discharged from the hospital a half day earlier than spinal-fusion patients, and the 2 groups were comparable in terms of complication rates. The results were presented in March 2004 at the 20th annual meeting of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (AANS/CNS) Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves in San Diego, CA. In this study, average range of motion in the disk group was 7.4 at 2 years, according to radiographic findings. Disk-space height was restored from an average of 5.7 mm before surgery to 12.9 mm at 2 years after surgery. After the procedure, 88% of patients were satisfied with the Charite disk procedure, compared with 81% of spinal-fusion patients. In light of the FDA approval of the Charite, the Texas Back Institute opened the nation's first center dedicated to the study and application of spine arthroplasty. So far, the waiting list is 80 patients long, says Dr Blumenthal (Texas Back Institute), who is the director of the new center. " As we get more acceptance from third-party payers, these 80 will be done, " he says. " We are anticipating demand and are poised to meet it, " he says. " There is little doubt that other centers will open as well, " he says. " Other investigators made a conscious decision to focus their practice on spinal arthroplasty, " he says. " Studies on a number of other artificial disks are going on concurrently, " he adds. " The Charite is transformational technology, and we will see much of the field transition as other artificial disks follow. " Others disks being developed include PRODISC-C (Synthes-Stratec/Spine Solutions, Oberdorf, Switzerland), the MAVERICK Artificial Disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek Inc, Minneapolis, MN), and the Actipore Artificial Disc Replacement System (Biorthex, Montreal, QC). Source Geisler F. American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves; March 17-20, 2004; San Diego, CA. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.