Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 What is " anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) " ????? Is this something they can do a blood test to determine if you have? And I can't tell for sure, is having it a good thing or a bad thing? Is it something they could test you for early and see if you will get joint damage, or that they test you for later to see if you have experienced joint damage? I think the former, but again, I am not sure from reading the article. Any clarification would be helpful. Jennie > Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1090-5. > > > Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in > clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides > (anti-CCP). > > > Forslind K, Ahlmen M, Eberhardt K, Hafstrom I, Svensson B. > > Blistorpsvagen 105, 290 38 Villands Vanga, Sweden. > bjoern.svensson@s... > > OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide > antibody (anti-CCP) for the prediction of radiological outcome in > patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Anti-CCP was assessed > at baseline in 379 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (disease > duration <1 year). Radiological joint damage and progression were > assessed by Larsen score after two years of follow up (end point) and > used as outcome variables. The prognostic value of anti-CCP and other > demographic and disease related baseline variables were assessed by > univariate and multivariate analyses, including calculation of odds > ratios (OR), predictive values, and multiple logistic regression models. > RESULTS: The presence of anti-CCP was associated with significantly > higher Larsen score both at baseline and at end point. Univariate > predictor analysis showed that anti-CCP had the highest significant OR > for radiological joint damage and progression after baseline Larsen > score, followed by rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate > (ESR), C reactive protein, age, smoking status, and sex. In stepwise > multiple regression analyses, baseline Larsen score, anti-CCP, and ESR > were selected as significant independent predictors of the radiological > outcomes. > > CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for an association of anti-CCP with > radiological joint changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-CCP is an > independent predictor of radiological damage and progression. Though > prediction in early rheumatoid arthritis is still far from perfect, the > use of anti-CCP in clinical practice should make it easier for > rheumatologists to reach judicious treatment decisions. > > PMID: 15308518 > > > > > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 What is " anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) " ????? Is this something they can do a blood test to determine if you have? And I can't tell for sure, is having it a good thing or a bad thing? Is it something they could test you for early and see if you will get joint damage, or that they test you for later to see if you have experienced joint damage? I think the former, but again, I am not sure from reading the article. Any clarification would be helpful. Jennie > Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1090-5. > > > Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in > clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides > (anti-CCP). > > > Forslind K, Ahlmen M, Eberhardt K, Hafstrom I, Svensson B. > > Blistorpsvagen 105, 290 38 Villands Vanga, Sweden. > bjoern.svensson@s... > > OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide > antibody (anti-CCP) for the prediction of radiological outcome in > patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Anti-CCP was assessed > at baseline in 379 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (disease > duration <1 year). Radiological joint damage and progression were > assessed by Larsen score after two years of follow up (end point) and > used as outcome variables. The prognostic value of anti-CCP and other > demographic and disease related baseline variables were assessed by > univariate and multivariate analyses, including calculation of odds > ratios (OR), predictive values, and multiple logistic regression models. > RESULTS: The presence of anti-CCP was associated with significantly > higher Larsen score both at baseline and at end point. Univariate > predictor analysis showed that anti-CCP had the highest significant OR > for radiological joint damage and progression after baseline Larsen > score, followed by rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate > (ESR), C reactive protein, age, smoking status, and sex. In stepwise > multiple regression analyses, baseline Larsen score, anti-CCP, and ESR > were selected as significant independent predictors of the radiological > outcomes. > > CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for an association of anti-CCP with > radiological joint changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-CCP is an > independent predictor of radiological damage and progression. Though > prediction in early rheumatoid arthritis is still far from perfect, the > use of anti-CCP in clinical practice should make it easier for > rheumatologists to reach judicious treatment decisions. > > PMID: 15308518 > > > > > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 Jennie, yes, there are blood tests your rheumatologist can order to detect the presence of antibodies to citrullinated peptides in your serum (several versions are available). Would it be politically incorrect to say that having these antibodies is a bad thing, LOL? I'll go out on a limb and say that the average person wouldn't want these antibodies since, if they are present, then RA is the most likely diagnosis. An anti-CCP-positive person would also be statistically more likely to have erosive disease than someone with RA who is anti-CCP-negative. As you know, early diagnosis and treatment of RA is very important, and the search for better diagnostic and prognostic tools has been underway for years. In this particular study, they used an ELISA CCP2 test and it outperformed RF; however, as a predictor of radiological outcome after two years in this study, the baseline Larsen score (based on x-rays) was more important than the results of the anti-CCP test. It's important to keep in mind that it is not a perfect test. An individual could have RA and test negative for anti-CCP. A person could test positive for anti-CCP and not develop more severe joint damage than someone with RA who is anti-CCP-negative. Same old problem! Anti-CCP can be very helpful in making an RA diagnosis and in judging the prognosis though, especially when used in conjunction with the other tests and markers we already have. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org [ ] Re: Prediction of radiological outcome in early RA: role of anti-CCP > What is " anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) " ????? > Is this something they can do a blood test to determine if you have? > And I can't tell for sure, is having it a good thing or a bad thing? > Is it something they could test you for early and see if you will get > joint damage, or that they test you for later to see if you have > experienced joint damage? I think the former, but again, I am not > sure from reading the article. Any clarification would be helpful. > > Jennie > > > > Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1090-5. > > > > > > Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in > > clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides > > (anti-CCP). > > > > > > Forslind K, Ahlmen M, Eberhardt K, Hafstrom I, Svensson B. > > > > Blistorpsvagen 105, 290 38 Villands Vanga, Sweden. > > bjoern.svensson@s... > > > > OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of anti-cyclic citrullinated > peptide > > antibody (anti-CCP) for the prediction of radiological outcome in > > patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Anti-CCP was > assessed > > at baseline in 379 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (disease > > duration <1 year). Radiological joint damage and progression were > > assessed by Larsen score after two years of follow up (end point) > and > > used as outcome variables. The prognostic value of anti-CCP and > other > > demographic and disease related baseline variables were assessed by > > univariate and multivariate analyses, including calculation of odds > > ratios (OR), predictive values, and multiple logistic regression > models. > > RESULTS: The presence of anti-CCP was associated with significantly > > higher Larsen score both at baseline and at end point. Univariate > > predictor analysis showed that anti-CCP had the highest significant > OR > > for radiological joint damage and progression after baseline Larsen > > score, followed by rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate > > (ESR), C reactive protein, age, smoking status, and sex. In stepwise > > multiple regression analyses, baseline Larsen score, anti-CCP, and > ESR > > were selected as significant independent predictors of the > radiological > > outcomes. > > > > CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for an association of anti-CCP > with > > radiological joint changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-CCP is an > > independent predictor of radiological damage and progression. Though > > prediction in early rheumatoid arthritis is still far from perfect, > the > > use of anti-CCP in clinical practice should make it easier for > > rheumatologists to reach judicious treatment decisions. > > > > PMID: 15308518 > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2004 Report Share Posted August 16, 2004 Jennie, yes, there are blood tests your rheumatologist can order to detect the presence of antibodies to citrullinated peptides in your serum (several versions are available). Would it be politically incorrect to say that having these antibodies is a bad thing, LOL? I'll go out on a limb and say that the average person wouldn't want these antibodies since, if they are present, then RA is the most likely diagnosis. An anti-CCP-positive person would also be statistically more likely to have erosive disease than someone with RA who is anti-CCP-negative. As you know, early diagnosis and treatment of RA is very important, and the search for better diagnostic and prognostic tools has been underway for years. In this particular study, they used an ELISA CCP2 test and it outperformed RF; however, as a predictor of radiological outcome after two years in this study, the baseline Larsen score (based on x-rays) was more important than the results of the anti-CCP test. It's important to keep in mind that it is not a perfect test. An individual could have RA and test negative for anti-CCP. A person could test positive for anti-CCP and not develop more severe joint damage than someone with RA who is anti-CCP-negative. Same old problem! Anti-CCP can be very helpful in making an RA diagnosis and in judging the prognosis though, especially when used in conjunction with the other tests and markers we already have. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org [ ] Re: Prediction of radiological outcome in early RA: role of anti-CCP > What is " anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) " ????? > Is this something they can do a blood test to determine if you have? > And I can't tell for sure, is having it a good thing or a bad thing? > Is it something they could test you for early and see if you will get > joint damage, or that they test you for later to see if you have > experienced joint damage? I think the former, but again, I am not > sure from reading the article. Any clarification would be helpful. > > Jennie > > > > Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1090-5. > > > > > > Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in > > clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides > > (anti-CCP). > > > > > > Forslind K, Ahlmen M, Eberhardt K, Hafstrom I, Svensson B. > > > > Blistorpsvagen 105, 290 38 Villands Vanga, Sweden. > > bjoern.svensson@s... > > > > OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of anti-cyclic citrullinated > peptide > > antibody (anti-CCP) for the prediction of radiological outcome in > > patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Anti-CCP was > assessed > > at baseline in 379 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (disease > > duration <1 year). Radiological joint damage and progression were > > assessed by Larsen score after two years of follow up (end point) > and > > used as outcome variables. The prognostic value of anti-CCP and > other > > demographic and disease related baseline variables were assessed by > > univariate and multivariate analyses, including calculation of odds > > ratios (OR), predictive values, and multiple logistic regression > models. > > RESULTS: The presence of anti-CCP was associated with significantly > > higher Larsen score both at baseline and at end point. Univariate > > predictor analysis showed that anti-CCP had the highest significant > OR > > for radiological joint damage and progression after baseline Larsen > > score, followed by rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate > > (ESR), C reactive protein, age, smoking status, and sex. In stepwise > > multiple regression analyses, baseline Larsen score, anti-CCP, and > ESR > > were selected as significant independent predictors of the > radiological > > outcomes. > > > > CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for an association of anti-CCP > with > > radiological joint changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-CCP is an > > independent predictor of radiological damage and progression. Though > > prediction in early rheumatoid arthritis is still far from perfect, > the > > use of anti-CCP in clinical practice should make it easier for > > rheumatologists to reach judicious treatment decisions. > > > > PMID: 15308518 > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 , Do you know if someone with RA would have the antibodies before they actually develop RA? For example, I got RA at age 32 - would I have had the CPP when I was a child if the test had been available then? Or do you just develop the antibodies when you develop RA? I prescribe to the theory you need an environmental trigger to bring the RA on... however, I am hopeful they will find a way to test if one has the RA gene. If you knew you had the gene, then you could live your life in a way to try and avoid a trigger for the disease. Since RA runs in my family, I am mostly thinking of my niece and my daughter. Jennie > > > Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1090-5. > > > > > > > > > Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in > > > clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides > > > (anti-CCP). > > > > > > > > > Forslind K, Ahlmen M, Eberhardt K, Hafstrom I, Svensson B. > > > > > > Blistorpsvagen 105, 290 38 Villands Vanga, Sweden. > > > bjoern.svensson@s... > > > > > > OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of anti-cyclic citrullinated > > peptide > > > antibody (anti-CCP) for the prediction of radiological outcome in > > > patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Anti-CCP was > > assessed > > > at baseline in 379 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (disease > > > duration <1 year). Radiological joint damage and progression were > > > assessed by Larsen score after two years of follow up (end point) > > and > > > used as outcome variables. The prognostic value of anti-CCP and > > other > > > demographic and disease related baseline variables were assessed by > > > univariate and multivariate analyses, including calculation of odds > > > ratios (OR), predictive values, and multiple logistic regression > > models. > > > RESULTS: The presence of anti-CCP was associated with significantly > > > higher Larsen score both at baseline and at end point. Univariate > > > predictor analysis showed that anti-CCP had the highest significant > > OR > > > for radiological joint damage and progression after baseline Larsen > > > score, followed by rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate > > > (ESR), C reactive protein, age, smoking status, and sex. In stepwise > > > multiple regression analyses, baseline Larsen score, anti-CCP, and > > ESR > > > were selected as significant independent predictors of the > > radiological > > > outcomes. > > > > > > CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for an association of anti- CCP > > with > > > radiological joint changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-CCP is an > > > independent predictor of radiological damage and progression. Though > > > prediction in early rheumatoid arthritis is still far from perfect, > > the > > > use of anti-CCP in clinical practice should make it easier for > > > rheumatologists to reach judicious treatment decisions. > > > > > > PMID: 15308518 > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 , Do you know if someone with RA would have the antibodies before they actually develop RA? For example, I got RA at age 32 - would I have had the CPP when I was a child if the test had been available then? Or do you just develop the antibodies when you develop RA? I prescribe to the theory you need an environmental trigger to bring the RA on... however, I am hopeful they will find a way to test if one has the RA gene. If you knew you had the gene, then you could live your life in a way to try and avoid a trigger for the disease. Since RA runs in my family, I am mostly thinking of my niece and my daughter. Jennie > > > Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1090-5. > > > > > > > > > Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis in > > > clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides > > > (anti-CCP). > > > > > > > > > Forslind K, Ahlmen M, Eberhardt K, Hafstrom I, Svensson B. > > > > > > Blistorpsvagen 105, 290 38 Villands Vanga, Sweden. > > > bjoern.svensson@s... > > > > > > OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of anti-cyclic citrullinated > > peptide > > > antibody (anti-CCP) for the prediction of radiological outcome in > > > patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Anti-CCP was > > assessed > > > at baseline in 379 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (disease > > > duration <1 year). Radiological joint damage and progression were > > > assessed by Larsen score after two years of follow up (end point) > > and > > > used as outcome variables. The prognostic value of anti-CCP and > > other > > > demographic and disease related baseline variables were assessed by > > > univariate and multivariate analyses, including calculation of odds > > > ratios (OR), predictive values, and multiple logistic regression > > models. > > > RESULTS: The presence of anti-CCP was associated with significantly > > > higher Larsen score both at baseline and at end point. Univariate > > > predictor analysis showed that anti-CCP had the highest significant > > OR > > > for radiological joint damage and progression after baseline Larsen > > > score, followed by rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate > > > (ESR), C reactive protein, age, smoking status, and sex. In stepwise > > > multiple regression analyses, baseline Larsen score, anti-CCP, and > > ESR > > > were selected as significant independent predictors of the > > radiological > > > outcomes. > > > > > > CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for an association of anti- CCP > > with > > > radiological joint changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-CCP is an > > > independent predictor of radiological damage and progression. Though > > > prediction in early rheumatoid arthritis is still far from perfect, > > the > > > use of anti-CCP in clinical practice should make it easier for > > > rheumatologists to reach judicious treatment decisions. > > > > > > PMID: 15308518 > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Jennie, I believe that I got RA from a parasite or whatever when we were in Mexico. I was diagnosed 6 months later without ever having had any symtoms whatsoever. Also, there is no RA in any part of my family so it came as a complete shock. It also came on very acutely. No sign of it before. I will speak to my doctor about enbrel when I go next month. My chiropractor is doing some research for me as well. ette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Jennie, I believe that I got RA from a parasite or whatever when we were in Mexico. I was diagnosed 6 months later without ever having had any symtoms whatsoever. Also, there is no RA in any part of my family so it came as a complete shock. It also came on very acutely. No sign of it before. I will speak to my doctor about enbrel when I go next month. My chiropractor is doing some research for me as well. ette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 , I have a related question. Do you know if the anti-CCP test results are affected by treatment or lack of treatment (like having your sed rate decrease once you start treatment)? OR is it something you either have or don't have, so if your test comes back positive there's really no reason to test again? I think the anti-ccp was the test that led my doctor to change my dx from some unidentified arthritis to RA. > > > > Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1090-5. > > > > > > > > > > > > Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid > arthritis in > > > > clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides > > > > (anti-CCP). > > > > > > > > > > > > Forslind K, Ahlmen M, Eberhardt K, Hafstrom I, Svensson B. > > > > > > > > Blistorpsvagen 105, 290 38 Villands Vanga, Sweden. > > > > bjoern.svensson@s... > > > > > > > > OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of anti-cyclic citrullinated > > > peptide > > > > antibody (anti-CCP) for the prediction of radiological outcome > in > > > > patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Anti-CCP was > > > assessed > > > > at baseline in 379 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis > (disease > > > > duration <1 year). Radiological joint damage and progression > were > > > > assessed by Larsen score after two years of follow up (end > point) > > > and > > > > used as outcome variables. The prognostic value of anti-CCP and > > > other > > > > demographic and disease related baseline variables were > assessed by > > > > univariate and multivariate analyses, including calculation of > odds > > > > ratios (OR), predictive values, and multiple logistic regression > > > models. > > > > RESULTS: The presence of anti-CCP was associated with > significantly > > > > higher Larsen score both at baseline and at end point. > Univariate > > > > predictor analysis showed that anti-CCP had the highest > significant > > > OR > > > > for radiological joint damage and progression after baseline > Larsen > > > > score, followed by rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation > rate > > > > (ESR), C reactive protein, age, smoking status, and sex. In > stepwise > > > > multiple regression analyses, baseline Larsen score, anti- CCP, > and > > > ESR > > > > were selected as significant independent predictors of the > > > radiological > > > > outcomes. > > > > > > > > CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for an association of anti- > CCP > > > with > > > > radiological joint changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-CCP is > an > > > > independent predictor of radiological damage and progression. > Though > > > > prediction in early rheumatoid arthritis is still far from > perfect, > > > the > > > > use of anti-CCP in clinical practice should make it easier for > > > > rheumatologists to reach judicious treatment decisions. > > > > > > > > PMID: 15308518 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 , I have a related question. Do you know if the anti-CCP test results are affected by treatment or lack of treatment (like having your sed rate decrease once you start treatment)? OR is it something you either have or don't have, so if your test comes back positive there's really no reason to test again? I think the anti-ccp was the test that led my doctor to change my dx from some unidentified arthritis to RA. > > > > Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1090-5. > > > > > > > > > > > > Prediction of radiological outcome in early rheumatoid > arthritis in > > > > clinical practice: role of antibodies to citrullinated peptides > > > > (anti-CCP). > > > > > > > > > > > > Forslind K, Ahlmen M, Eberhardt K, Hafstrom I, Svensson B. > > > > > > > > Blistorpsvagen 105, 290 38 Villands Vanga, Sweden. > > > > bjoern.svensson@s... > > > > > > > > OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of anti-cyclic citrullinated > > > peptide > > > > antibody (anti-CCP) for the prediction of radiological outcome > in > > > > patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Anti-CCP was > > > assessed > > > > at baseline in 379 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis > (disease > > > > duration <1 year). Radiological joint damage and progression > were > > > > assessed by Larsen score after two years of follow up (end > point) > > > and > > > > used as outcome variables. The prognostic value of anti-CCP and > > > other > > > > demographic and disease related baseline variables were > assessed by > > > > univariate and multivariate analyses, including calculation of > odds > > > > ratios (OR), predictive values, and multiple logistic regression > > > models. > > > > RESULTS: The presence of anti-CCP was associated with > significantly > > > > higher Larsen score both at baseline and at end point. > Univariate > > > > predictor analysis showed that anti-CCP had the highest > significant > > > OR > > > > for radiological joint damage and progression after baseline > Larsen > > > > score, followed by rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation > rate > > > > (ESR), C reactive protein, age, smoking status, and sex. In > stepwise > > > > multiple regression analyses, baseline Larsen score, anti- CCP, > and > > > ESR > > > > were selected as significant independent predictors of the > > > radiological > > > > outcomes. > > > > > > > > CONCLUSIONS: There is good evidence for an association of anti- > CCP > > > with > > > > radiological joint changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Anti-CCP is > an > > > > independent predictor of radiological damage and progression. > Though > > > > prediction in early rheumatoid arthritis is still far from > perfect, > > > the > > > > use of anti-CCP in clinical practice should make it easier for > > > > rheumatologists to reach judicious treatment decisions. > > > > > > > > PMID: 15308518 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Well, Jennie, you may not be positive for anti-CCP now. Remember, not everyone with RA is. There is evidence that some people develop antibodies long before they have any signs or symptoms of illness; however, there are also people who have certain antibodies who are seemingly quite healthy. For example, about 10% of people who test positive for ANA do not have a disease. I am not aware of much good data on what antibodies are present in children and what that implies for their future health. Also, even if anti-CCP positivity in childhood could predict adult RA, I'm not sure too many doctors and parents would be willing to possibly psychologically harm a child by hanging a sword of Damocles such as that over them. There are probably several genes and multiple triggers involved in the development of RA, so it would be hard to know what to avoid. Obviously, you can't avoid your genes - too late, LOL. Exercising, getting proper sleep, eating a healthy diet, maintaining a normal weight, and not ever smoking would be a very wise lifestyle for those with a lot of immune system dysfunction in the family. Then again, who wouldn't benefit from such an approach? There is at least one identical twin in our group. She has RA and yet her twin doesn't. There have been many twin studies that show that there is a relatively low concordance rate for RA, so, although the genes are important, environmental factors have a tremendous impact. Unfortunately, we don't know what those external variables are. Smoking does seem to be one of them. We have to hope that we have the answers to the RA mystery soon and that future generations will be spared. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org [ ] Re: Prediction of radiological outcome in early RA: role of anti-CCP > , > > Do you know if someone with RA would have the antibodies before they > actually develop RA? For example, I got RA at age 32 - would I have > had the CPP when I was a child if the test had been available then? > Or do you just develop the antibodies when you develop RA? > > I prescribe to the theory you need an environmental trigger to bring > the RA on... however, I am hopeful they will find a way to test if > one has the RA gene. If you knew you had the gene, then you could > live your life in a way to try and avoid a trigger for the disease. > Since RA runs in my family, I am mostly thinking of my niece and my > daughter. > > Jennie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Well, Jennie, you may not be positive for anti-CCP now. Remember, not everyone with RA is. There is evidence that some people develop antibodies long before they have any signs or symptoms of illness; however, there are also people who have certain antibodies who are seemingly quite healthy. For example, about 10% of people who test positive for ANA do not have a disease. I am not aware of much good data on what antibodies are present in children and what that implies for their future health. Also, even if anti-CCP positivity in childhood could predict adult RA, I'm not sure too many doctors and parents would be willing to possibly psychologically harm a child by hanging a sword of Damocles such as that over them. There are probably several genes and multiple triggers involved in the development of RA, so it would be hard to know what to avoid. Obviously, you can't avoid your genes - too late, LOL. Exercising, getting proper sleep, eating a healthy diet, maintaining a normal weight, and not ever smoking would be a very wise lifestyle for those with a lot of immune system dysfunction in the family. Then again, who wouldn't benefit from such an approach? There is at least one identical twin in our group. She has RA and yet her twin doesn't. There have been many twin studies that show that there is a relatively low concordance rate for RA, so, although the genes are important, environmental factors have a tremendous impact. Unfortunately, we don't know what those external variables are. Smoking does seem to be one of them. We have to hope that we have the answers to the RA mystery soon and that future generations will be spared. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org [ ] Re: Prediction of radiological outcome in early RA: role of anti-CCP > , > > Do you know if someone with RA would have the antibodies before they > actually develop RA? For example, I got RA at age 32 - would I have > had the CPP when I was a child if the test had been available then? > Or do you just develop the antibodies when you develop RA? > > I prescribe to the theory you need an environmental trigger to bring > the RA on... however, I am hopeful they will find a way to test if > one has the RA gene. If you knew you had the gene, then you could > live your life in a way to try and avoid a trigger for the disease. > Since RA runs in my family, I am mostly thinking of my niece and my > daughter. > > Jennie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 My daughter will grow up knowing she could get this disease. The things I want to encourage her to do to avoid it (in addition to never smoking, no brainer there) is exercising, eating healthy, avoiding exposure to lots of household and other chemicals, not having a high stress job, etc. Of course, you can't avoid any and all stress. I just want her to be careful and be as healthy as she can be. Living healthy is a good thing even if she doesn't have the RA gene. I think my trigger for RA was this one week where we had two deaths in the family (one expected, one very much not expected), and I got a horrible stomach virus... it went something like this: Monday grandfather died, Wednesday learned of aunt's death (my daughters god mother, she died Tuesday but was not found until Wednesday), Thursday night baby got sick with stomach virus (right after I finished packing at 1am), Friday am (with baby throwing up) flew to Colorado, Friday afternoon attended grandfather's funeral, Friday night I started getting sick from the stomach virus, Saturday attended sister- in-laws wedding (the trip to Colorado was planned for the wedding, funeral was held on Friday so I could attend), Sunday attended my sister's baby shower, Monday flew home (baby and me still recovering from virus), Tuesday attended second funeral and had everyone back at our house after (which we were soooo prepared for). After this I started loosing weight without changing anything about my lifestyle and 9 months later RA symptoms started. Oh, and during this time I was working for Andersen. A job in public accounting is guaranteed to be stressful, but having your company disintegrate around you and not knowing each day if that is the day you'll be let go, was very stressful. Jennie > Well, Jennie, you may not be positive for anti-CCP now. Remember, not > everyone with RA is. > > There is evidence that some people develop antibodies long before they > have any signs or symptoms of illness; however, there are also people > who have certain antibodies who are seemingly quite healthy. For > example, about 10% of people who test positive for ANA do not have a > disease. > > I am not aware of much good data on what antibodies are present in > children and what that implies for their future health. Also, even if > anti-CCP positivity in childhood could predict adult RA, I'm not sure > too many doctors and parents would be willing to possibly > psychologically harm a child by hanging a sword of Damocles such as that > over them. > > There are probably several genes and multiple triggers involved in the > development of RA, so it would be hard to know what to avoid. Obviously, > you can't avoid your genes - too late, LOL. Exercising, getting proper > sleep, eating a healthy diet, maintaining a normal weight, and not ever > smoking would be a very wise lifestyle for those with a lot of immune > system dysfunction in the family. Then again, who wouldn't benefit from > such an approach? > > There is at least one identical twin in our group. She has RA and yet > her twin doesn't. There have been many twin studies that show that there > is a relatively low concordance rate for RA, so, although the genes are > important, environmental factors have a tremendous impact. > Unfortunately, we don't know what those external variables are. Smoking > does seem to be one of them. > > We have to hope that we have the answers to the RA mystery soon and that > future generations will be spared. > > > > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org > > > [ ] Re: Prediction of radiological outcome in early > RA: role of anti-CCP > > > > , > > > > Do you know if someone with RA would have the antibodies before they > > actually develop RA? For example, I got RA at age 32 - would I have > > had the CPP when I was a child if the test had been available then? > > Or do you just develop the antibodies when you develop RA? > > > > I prescribe to the theory you need an environmental trigger to bring > > the RA on... however, I am hopeful they will find a way to test if > > one has the RA gene. If you knew you had the gene, then you could > > live your life in a way to try and avoid a trigger for the disease. > > Since RA runs in my family, I am mostly thinking of my niece and my > > daughter. > > > > Jennie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 My daughter will grow up knowing she could get this disease. The things I want to encourage her to do to avoid it (in addition to never smoking, no brainer there) is exercising, eating healthy, avoiding exposure to lots of household and other chemicals, not having a high stress job, etc. Of course, you can't avoid any and all stress. I just want her to be careful and be as healthy as she can be. Living healthy is a good thing even if she doesn't have the RA gene. I think my trigger for RA was this one week where we had two deaths in the family (one expected, one very much not expected), and I got a horrible stomach virus... it went something like this: Monday grandfather died, Wednesday learned of aunt's death (my daughters god mother, she died Tuesday but was not found until Wednesday), Thursday night baby got sick with stomach virus (right after I finished packing at 1am), Friday am (with baby throwing up) flew to Colorado, Friday afternoon attended grandfather's funeral, Friday night I started getting sick from the stomach virus, Saturday attended sister- in-laws wedding (the trip to Colorado was planned for the wedding, funeral was held on Friday so I could attend), Sunday attended my sister's baby shower, Monday flew home (baby and me still recovering from virus), Tuesday attended second funeral and had everyone back at our house after (which we were soooo prepared for). After this I started loosing weight without changing anything about my lifestyle and 9 months later RA symptoms started. Oh, and during this time I was working for Andersen. A job in public accounting is guaranteed to be stressful, but having your company disintegrate around you and not knowing each day if that is the day you'll be let go, was very stressful. Jennie > Well, Jennie, you may not be positive for anti-CCP now. Remember, not > everyone with RA is. > > There is evidence that some people develop antibodies long before they > have any signs or symptoms of illness; however, there are also people > who have certain antibodies who are seemingly quite healthy. For > example, about 10% of people who test positive for ANA do not have a > disease. > > I am not aware of much good data on what antibodies are present in > children and what that implies for their future health. Also, even if > anti-CCP positivity in childhood could predict adult RA, I'm not sure > too many doctors and parents would be willing to possibly > psychologically harm a child by hanging a sword of Damocles such as that > over them. > > There are probably several genes and multiple triggers involved in the > development of RA, so it would be hard to know what to avoid. Obviously, > you can't avoid your genes - too late, LOL. Exercising, getting proper > sleep, eating a healthy diet, maintaining a normal weight, and not ever > smoking would be a very wise lifestyle for those with a lot of immune > system dysfunction in the family. Then again, who wouldn't benefit from > such an approach? > > There is at least one identical twin in our group. She has RA and yet > her twin doesn't. There have been many twin studies that show that there > is a relatively low concordance rate for RA, so, although the genes are > important, environmental factors have a tremendous impact. > Unfortunately, we don't know what those external variables are. Smoking > does seem to be one of them. > > We have to hope that we have the answers to the RA mystery soon and that > future generations will be spared. > > > > > I'll tell you where to go! > > Mayo Clinic in Rochester > http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester > > s Hopkins Medicine > http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org > > > [ ] Re: Prediction of radiological outcome in early > RA: role of anti-CCP > > > > , > > > > Do you know if someone with RA would have the antibodies before they > > actually develop RA? For example, I got RA at age 32 - would I have > > had the CPP when I was a child if the test had been available then? > > Or do you just develop the antibodies when you develop RA? > > > > I prescribe to the theory you need an environmental trigger to bring > > the RA on... however, I am hopeful they will find a way to test if > > one has the RA gene. If you knew you had the gene, then you could > > live your life in a way to try and avoid a trigger for the disease. > > Since RA runs in my family, I am mostly thinking of my niece and my > > daughter. > > > > Jennie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Hello, ! Many RA lab test results are affected by treatment. Several of the tests may be used to monitor fluctuations in disease activity, but there usually isn't a need to use more than one for that purpose. Why spend time on and money for two or more tests if together they won't provide better information than one alone? For example, RF and sed rate values may correlate well with disease activity, but using both won't necessarily tell you more than using just one of them. Usually the cheaper and easier to perform sed rate is sufficient. Some doctors use CRP instead of the sed rate. So, once the RA diagnosis is certain, it isn't necessary to repeat the RF and/or anti-CCP test. Since the anti-CCP test is relatively new, we are still learning about it, but the conclusion of some of the researchers involved in the TIRA project did state: " A similar proportion of positive anti-CCP antibody results was found 3 years after the diagnosis of RA (59%) compared with baseline (64%), but on average at a significantly decreased level. The number of patients not treated with DMARDs during these years, however, was too small to evaluate any influence of DMARD treatment on the levels of anti-CCP antibodies. " At the moment, one of the best uses of the anti-CCP test is in a case such as yours - to help confirm RA in a person who is RF-negative. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org [ ] Re: Prediction of radiological outcome in early RA: role of anti-CCP > , I have a related question. Do you know if the anti-CCP test > results are affected by treatment or lack of treatment (like having > your sed rate decrease once you start treatment)? OR is it something > you either have or don't have, so if your test comes back positive > there's really no reason to test again? I think the anti-ccp was the > test that led my doctor to change my dx from some unidentified > arthritis to RA. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2004 Report Share Posted August 17, 2004 Hello, ! Many RA lab test results are affected by treatment. Several of the tests may be used to monitor fluctuations in disease activity, but there usually isn't a need to use more than one for that purpose. Why spend time on and money for two or more tests if together they won't provide better information than one alone? For example, RF and sed rate values may correlate well with disease activity, but using both won't necessarily tell you more than using just one of them. Usually the cheaper and easier to perform sed rate is sufficient. Some doctors use CRP instead of the sed rate. So, once the RA diagnosis is certain, it isn't necessary to repeat the RF and/or anti-CCP test. Since the anti-CCP test is relatively new, we are still learning about it, but the conclusion of some of the researchers involved in the TIRA project did state: " A similar proportion of positive anti-CCP antibody results was found 3 years after the diagnosis of RA (59%) compared with baseline (64%), but on average at a significantly decreased level. The number of patients not treated with DMARDs during these years, however, was too small to evaluate any influence of DMARD treatment on the levels of anti-CCP antibodies. " At the moment, one of the best uses of the anti-CCP test is in a case such as yours - to help confirm RA in a person who is RF-negative. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org [ ] Re: Prediction of radiological outcome in early RA: role of anti-CCP > , I have a related question. Do you know if the anti-CCP test > results are affected by treatment or lack of treatment (like having > your sed rate decrease once you start treatment)? OR is it something > you either have or don't have, so if your test comes back positive > there's really no reason to test again? I think the anti-ccp was the > test that led my doctor to change my dx from some unidentified > arthritis to RA. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.