Guest guest Posted July 15, 2004 Report Share Posted July 15, 2004 Misuse of higher dose of rofecoxib is common Rheumawire Jul 15, 2004 Nainggolan Nashville, TN - The 50-mg dose of rofecoxib (Vioxx, Merck & Co)which is recommended for use in acute pain onlyis increasingly being prescribed long term for patients with arthritis and other chronic conditions, with a subsequent increased risk of adverse effects, US researchers report in the June 2004 issue of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety [1]. Lead researcher Dr Marie R (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN) believes the higher dose of rofecoxib should be abandoned altogether or at least restricted: " I personally think that the best thing would be to get rid of the 50-mg dose or sell it only in packages of 5. " " Rofecoxib is unusual among nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], in that the licensed dose for acute pain is double the maximum dose recommended for chronic use, " and colleagues explain. (In the US, rofecoxib is licensed for chronic use for osteoarthritis at doses of 12.5 mg and 25 mg and for acute pain at doses to 50 mg.) The researchers counted the number of prescriptions for NSAIDs, including ibuprofen, naproxen, celecoxib (Celebrex, Pfizer), and rofecoxib given to participants aged over 49 in Tennessee's Medicaid program, called TennCare. Of 40 000 participants who had prescriptions for any NSAID as of July 1, 2001, 46% were prescribed the COX-2 inhibitors, either rofecoxib or celecoxib, and 37% were given ibuprofen or naproxen. Rofecoxib was prescribed at doses greater than recommended for chronic use for a substantial number of users, 17%, compared with less than 1% of ibuprofen and celecoxib users. More than 1000 of the 9841 people taking rofecoxib were " high-dose " users, with 30-day supplies of 50-mg pills. This is despite the fact that the 50-mg dose has not been shown to be more effective than lower doses of the drug in relieving chronic pain and has been linked to an increased risk of hypertension, edema, and myocardial infarctions, say the researchers. " The use of the 50-mg dose is likely the result of physicians using the doses approved for acute pain and chronic arthritis interchangeably, a perception that may have arisen in part from the fact that the best-known clinical trial of rofecoxib, the VIGOR study, used a 50-mg dose, " the researchers note. " We think that the rationale is that if 25 mg works well, then 50 mg is going to work better, " says . " But when you look at the scant data that are out there for chronic pain, there's been no study that shows that 50 is better than 25. " " This is really common with a lot of drugs, that there's a ceiling on the effective dose. . . . But unfortunately, there's usually not a ceiling on the side effects, " adds. " Since the 50-mg dose has clinically significant undesirable effects and has not been shown to be more effective than the lower doses, chronic use of high-dose rofecoxib should be discouraged, " the researchers say. They add that a follow-up COX-2 inhibitor, valdecoxib (Bextra, Pfizer), is " similar " to rofecoxib in that a 10-mg dose is the maximum recommended for arthritis, whereas a 4-fold higher dose, 20 mg twice daily, is recommended for dysmenorrhea. " Further investigation of potential adverse effects of chronic use of these high doses of COX-2 inhibitors intended for short-term indications is warranted, " they conclude. Source MR, Stein CM, Graham DJ, et al. High frequency of use of rofecoxib at greater than recommended doses: cause for concern. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2004; 13:339-343. I'll tell you where to go! Mayo Clinic in Rochester http://www.mayoclinic.org/rochester s Hopkins Medicine http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.