Guest guest Posted December 29, 2004 Report Share Posted December 29, 2004 Low-dose CYC induction, AZA maintenance recommended for lupus nephritis Dec 29, 2004 Janis Brussels, Belgium - Long-term follow-up of patients from the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial shows that induction with the low-dose IV cyclophosphamide (CYC) regimen used in that study, followed by azathioprine (AZA) maintenance, is likely as effective as the widely used " NIH regimen " of high-dose CYC for controlling nephritis and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) risk in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [1]. Results of the study are published in the December 2004 issue of Arthritis & Rheumatism. A high-dose long course of quarterly IV CYC pulse therapy is probably not justified anymore as remission-maintaining therapy in most lupus nephritis patients. " Faced with a patient with newly diagnosed Class 3 or 4 lupus nephritis, a reasonable choice in 2004 is to prescribe a 3-to-6-month IV CYC course as initial therapy, in addition to glucocorticoids. Although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a new star twinkling in the sky, we still lack long-term follow-up data on patients given the drug as initial therapy. For maintenance, the choice is currently between AZA and MMF, " lead author Dr Frederic A Houssiau (Universite Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium) tells rheumawire. " A high-dose long course of quarterly IV CYC pulse therapy is probably not justified anymore as remission-maintaining therapy in most lupus nephritis patients, mainly because of its gonadal toxicity, except when the latter concern is not applicable or when anticipated lack of compliance to daily oral immunosuppressive treatment should be avoided by the use of IV therapy. " Long-term data from Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial In the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, after 3 IV pulses of 750-mg methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisolone for 4 weeks, 90 patients were randomized to induction with a high-dose IV CYC regimen (6 monthly pulses and 2 quarterly pulses with escalating doses) or with a low-dose IV CYC regimen (6 pulses of 500 mg given at intervals of 2 weeks). Both groups then received AZA (2 mg/kg per day). Study end points were renal function (based on serum creatinine). Kidney biopsies were obtained at baseline in all subjects and after about 2 years of follow-up in 11 patients in the low-dose group and 9 in the high-dose group. After a median follow-up of 73 months, there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with permanently impaired renal function in the low-dose vs high-dose patients (20% vs 23%, p=NS). Similarly, there was no greater cumulative probability of ESRD or doubling of the serum creatinine value in the low-dose vs high-dose patients. Houssiau tells rheumawire that the median follow-up of 73 months shows that induction with the Euro-Lupus low-dose IV CYC regimen was not inferior to induction with a high-dose CYC regimen, at least for European patients. " Outcomes may be different in African Americans. We do not know, " he says. Houssiau's current approach to induction therapy in lupus nephritis is to give 3 daily pulses of 1 g of methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisolone (mostly 0.5 mg/kg per day during one month; then tapered) along with 6 fixed doses of IV cyclophosphamide 500 mg IV given as a 30-minute drip infusion once every 2 weeks. " Please note that MMF is an alternative as induction immunosuppressive therapy, but we lack long-term follow up data, " Houssiau says. As maintenance, he gives AZA (2 to 2.5 mg/kg per day). Houssiau tells rheumawire that he is currently coordinating the MAINTAIN trial comparing AZA with MMF for maintenance therapy in lupus nephritis. " MMF might be superior to AZA based on the transplant data, but, so far, we don't know, " he says. Early response is essential The investigators also found that achieving an early response to therapy is key to preventing renal failure. " The 2 predictors [of avoiding progression to ESRD] were improvement in serum creatinine at 6 months and proteinuria less than 1 g at 6 months, " Houssiau says. For the patient whose renal response by 6 months is not adequate, Houssiau advises first checking patient compliance with treatment. " Also, optimize proteinuria-sparing measures (such as ACE inhibitors or diuretics) and blood-pressure control, " he says. Houssiau emphasizes that the big unanswered question is what the best regimen is for maintaining remission. He points out that AZA is almost certainly not the ideal drug, since it is associated with a 35% relapse rate. Source 1. Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D'Cruz D, et al. Early response to immunosuppressive therapy predicts good renal outcome in lupus nephritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50:3934-3940. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.