good vs evil and reproduction

[Guest guest]

GOOD VS EVIL

Let's Consider that goodness, growth, and being kind to one another,

is a superior force over the force of destruction, death, and being

mean to each other. (To do this, we consider all possibilities)

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Let's consider a universe with only the force of destruction. As

death /destruction progress, they take whatever is alive, and kill

it, so that where life once was, now exists (is produced) nothing

and nothingness. Ashes to ashes, and dust to dust. Pretty soon, life

becomes scarce, while a whole lot of empty space and inanimate

material is left behind. After awhile, all the life is killed, and

then what? With no life left to kill, the force of destruction comes

to a stop (no more destroying can be done), because from nothing,

this force can go no further from there. Here is a definite bottom

to the universe.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Now

consider the force of good-and-growth as being the only force

around. As this force acts, it takes nothingness/lifeless matter

(dust), and creates life in its place. Soon everything starts to

come alive. Pretty soon we begin to run out of improvements to make.

Emptiness and undeveloped raw material (dust) starts to come into

short supply. If everything is alive, then no more growth can be

done, and thus the force of good is stopped, right? Well, there's

not so much an absolute ceiling, as there is an absolute bottom. You

see, life forms can advance/be advanced and become ever more capable

and alive; and this thus continues the force of growth/goodness.

And, a universe that is alive (full of life), is very capable -able

to do lots of things, (unlike a barren universe consisting of

nothingness). And with that life/capability, it can bridge barriers

and reach raw material (dust) that had previously been separated

from it by a barrier. Hence, the force of goodness and growth can

survive by itself much better than the force of destruction/death

can. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

ALSO, it takes life-and-capability to do or be either the force of

good-and-growth, or the force of destruction. The lack of life can't

do/be either force. Since what the force of good produces is life,

such life can continue to do forces. But since what the force of

destruction produces is death, nothingness, voids in life; since

this cannot do or support either force, then the force of

destruction alone is destined to a quick end while the force of good

and growth alone is destined to continue.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ALSO,

since only life can do-be either force: When destruction experiences

what it produces, or is applied to itself, it doesn't grow, but

instead shrinks to nothing. xxxxxxxxxx But when goodness experiences

what it produces, (when goodness is good to itself) it does not die,

but instead, grows. So that the force of destruction needs something

other than just itself to exist (is a parasitic force), while the

force of good does not and is self sufficient with just itself. So

that when alone, good survives while destruction self eliminates and

vanishes. From this we can see that good and growth, is a superior

force to the force of death and destruction.

REPRODUCTION

Consider the concept of supply and demand; as applied to human

beings. If there is a shortage of humans, then they will have a

higher value and will be treated better. But if there is a surplus

of humans, then their value will be low, and they will be treated

poorly, according to their low value according to supply and

demand. So that when women are considering how many humans to

produce in terms of how large a family to have; collectively, they

have quite an impact on how we all are treated by those economic

forces that rule over us all.

And then there is the conservative, religious rules over our

sexuality. But first let us consider sexual reproduction in

itself. Sexual reproduction produces offspring that are not exact

copies of their parents, but who are different from their parents to

some degree. So, sexual reproduction generates differences between

each of us. Now, if we were all to have sex with each other in

unrestricted sexual reproduction, then those differences would be

spread all back among our population and we would not build on or

accentuate those differences. But that's not the way sexual

reproduction works in our world. Sexual reproduction is restricted

to one man one woman and to form a family grouping to raise the

offspring produced. So that the differences generated by sexual

reproduction are preserved and compounded over each successive

generation; so that different groups of people are developed each

being good in one particular area, while not so good in the other

areas. So that as individuals they cannot function well, but only

as a group can they work together to combine their good areas to

make a complete and competent societal whole. Thus the rulers of a

society have at their beck and call, all the humans of the society

to do their bidding, because as individuals they are all unbalanced

in their skills, incapable of being self sufficient as individuals,

who can only survive and excel by joining as a group each to

contribute their best skill. So that what the conservative rules

over our sexual reproduction do is to breed individuals who are

slaves who are easily molded by the rulers of a society, who are

incapable of much independence as individuals, so that we are more

so a commodity to be used by those who rule over us. Sometimes one

may resent being part of this conservative religious breeding

program that has made us to be not free, but slaves to those who

rule over us.

TO CONTINUE THIS DISCUSSION, SEE THE LINKS AREA of this group for

sex, and religion. Since someone is blocking me

from directly putting my link in this message.