Guest guest Posted August 7, 2012 Report Share Posted August 7, 2012 I have updated my article " The animistic archetypal nature of the unconscious " http://home7.swipnet.se/~w-73784/animism.htm It concerns the problem of the ontology of the archetype. The article proposes an " unconscious theism " and posits an unconscious psychic God, arguably a complement of the transcendental spiritual God. The objective psyche is an autonomous reality on a par with physical reality. The archetype, as such, needn't be defined in physical terms, since the psychic substratum in which it resides is permanent. The archetype is not a metaphysical imprint, nor is it defined by brain structure, or epigenetics, etc. The archetype evolves in an unconscious process of 'complementation'. If we venture into deep unconsciousness, at some instance we are bound to pass the border of the godhead. If correct, this is the 'unio mystica' of the Christian complentatives. At this level of psyche the archetypes are undergoing a slow process of formulation. They are not metaphysical imprints, but products of slow but powerful ideation. Mats Winther Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.