Re: Vaccines

[Guest guest]

Margaret, I do agree with you 100%!!!! goodness gracious, too many

too young!! Dawn

>

> Hi, Everyone....is it just me or do others think this is the

wrong direction

> to go in. I mean....giving more diseases instead of spreading

them out till

> the child get some immunity. I know the issue with vaccines is

the mercury,

> but I have issues with the number of 'diseases' that they inject

so early in

> life.

>

>

>

>

> FDA OKs Merck Vaccine for Four Childhood Diseases

>

>

> NEW YORK (Reuters) Sept 06 - Merck & Co. Inc. on Tuesday said

U.S.

> regulators have approved its combination vaccine to protect

children 12 months to 12

> years of age against measles, mumps, rubella and chickenpox.

> The vaccine, called Proquad, which combines two established Merck

vaccines,

> is the first approved in the United States to target all four

diseases in a

> single shot, Merck said.

> " The approval of Proquad makes it more likely that more children

can gain

> protection against these four diseases because fewer shots can

potentially mean

> better compliance, " said Henry Shinefield, clinical professor of

pediatrics

> and dermatology at the University of California School of

Medicine at San

> Francisco and a Proquad clinical investigator.

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Hi !

I received one vaccine last year (rubella) and I now suffer from

partial hearing loss - at the age of 34 I now have an Audiotory

Processing Disorder! I never had a problem with my hearing before

this vaccine and there is absolutely nothing I can do about it either

because an attorney told me that it would be a hard case to prove

without having a hearing exam prior to this vaccine (unless I was

completely deaf). As far as I know, when I was a child I never had

any bad reactions to any vaccines until this one.

At the same time, my infant was suffering from high-pitched

screaming, convulsions, congestion, developmental delays,

and " regression " in milestones from " some " of his recommended

vaccines last year. The extent of his injuries may not be evident

until the school years - another 4 years from now.

Looking back at my 14 year old's vaccine history/baby book - he

received all of his recommended vaccines and now suffers from ADHD, a

Math Disability, and a Visual Processing Disorder/Lazy Eye. When

reviewing his baby book, I noticed that he suffered from the same

type of congestion (daily for several months) following his 4 mo.

vaccines. He also suffered from conjunctivitis on numerous occasions

too. I have since learned that vision damage and hearing damage are

common adverse reactions to many vaccines. I actually can see that

at 6 mo. it was one dose of Hep B that damaged his right eye

(pictures of proof before/after). His lazy eye is barely noticeable,

but I can see when it happened. His Dad has one too (which is why I

never made the vaccine connection until recently). So, yes I believe

that individuals can be predisposed to certain conditions and

vaccines can be the smoking gun.

My life has been a nightmare and it only goes to show you that all it

takes is ONE vaccine to do the damage - whether it contains mercury

or not, it doesn't matter. I will never vaccinate myself, children,

or pets ever again.

My argument with the school would be the disclaimer on every vaccine -

Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, and Impairment of Fertility - no studies

have been done. They don't know if they cause cancer, alter our DNA,

or impair our fertility? Yet, they are quite safe? After viewing

VAERS, I noticed that some doctors reported A.L.L. Leukemia within 1-

2 months after vaccination. Their reports indicated that they felt

the vaccine(s) were to blame. That is an argument for philosophical

beliefs I would think. Here are the links if you would like to see.

http://vaers.hhs.gov/pdf/PackageInserts.pdf (to view all vaccines)

http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_infanrix.pdf (page 7 to view

ex. of new warning)

I also spoke with an Audiologist and Behavioral Optometrist and they

were shocked at viewing the adverse reactions to many vaccines. They

both agreed that many learning disabilities may be vaccine related.

http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/meruvax_ii/meruvax_ii_

pi.pdf (page 6 for common adverse reactions with Ears/Eyes – these

can definitely attribute to many learning disabilities to include the

following: Dyslexia, Visual Processing Disorders, Auditory

Processing Disorders, Speech/Language Impairments, etc)

In light of the recent Vioxx scandal (Merck), that is just further

proof that these lunatics cannot be trusted. For me, it is not a

hard decision anymore. I wish you luck with yours though. Please

feel free to email me anytime. I have researched vaccines for months

now and would be happy to share the info.

Dawn

>

> OK It is almost time for Tyler's 5 year vaccines and I am in an

indecisive

> place. On one hand I know it will be a fight with school and maybe

even

> daycare with the religious waiver not to get him vaccinated. I'm

sure you

> all have read that doctors can refuse to see the patients if they

aren't

> vaccinated and I am scared that schools and day cares may be able

to do the

> same thing. Plus, what if he really does need the vaccines for his

immunity.

> Which brings me to the other area, if he received all of his

vaccines to

> date, and he did because I didn't know better back then, then

shouldn't he

> be immune already? Why get these boosters if the first ones didn't

take. I

> mean he has had 4 DTaPs, 4 IPVs, 1 MMR, 4 HIB/HEPBs and 1 chicken

pox

> vaccine. Now he has to have another MMR, IPV, DTaP and PPD. If all

the

> previous 9 shots didn't make him immune how are the boosters going

to do the

> job?

> I know that even Kirby has said that he thinks vaccines are

very

> important they just need to be thimerosal free and I know that the

parents

> of autistics are not anti-vaccine, they are anti-mercury. And I

know that

> most of his shots (all except for the DTaP that he would be getting

because

> of insurance. It contains a " trace " ) are mercury free, or so

claimed. I just

> don't know, though, if I would like to support the very vaccine

> manufacturers that started this whole mess. I know they took if out

but not

> until they had to. These are still the same ones that manufacture

the ones

> today.

> I am open to any and every comment and thought on this matter. I

will take

> no offense to anything said. Feel free to tell me your story if you

want. I

> am just trying to get help in making this very tough decision.

> Thanks!

>

>

[Guest guest]

You have a point about starting vaxes after the child has

incontrovertibly established normal development. The problem is, of

course, that with the vaccines as they stand now, it's still an

experiment, since some kids have regressed after the age of four.

I agree that pushing the guidelines forward should go along with

cleaning up vaccine ingredients and massive safety testing...for them

that wants 'em.

>

> I think we parents should push for vaccines to be given starting at

the

> age 4 - If they are soooo safe - lets start them then or after the

> history of children have been documented. Ann

>