Guest guest Posted January 4, 2008 Report Share Posted January 4, 2008 Related article follows the AJE abstract - - - - *Traffic fumes are still damaging children's brains* * 03 January 2008 * Magazine issue 2637 http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19726371.000;jsessionid=HEBLOJIMBLAC Removing lead from petrol was supposed to prevent damage to children's mental development. Now it seems that traffic fumes may still be impairing their learning - because of the soot particles it contains. When Shakira Franco Suglia at Harvard University and her colleagues studied 200 children in nearby Boston they found that scores on verbal reasoning, visual learning and other tests were lower in those exposed to more traffic fumes. The IQ of children from areas of the city with above-average pollution levels was 3 points below those in cleaner areas, even after controlling for socio-economic factors (American Journal of Epidemiology, DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwm308). That puts the impact of soot on a par with lead and other toxic substances that damage brain development, says Franco Suglia. Since soot levels rise with traffic volume, Franco Suglia recognises that some other aspect of traffic may be the cause. However, ... +!+!+!+ * Association of Black Carbon with Cognition among Children in a Prospective Birth Cohort Study* S. Franco Suglia et al. American Journal of Epidemiology Received for publication June 20, 2007. Accepted for publication September 21, 2007. http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/kwm308v1 While studies show that ultrafine and fine particles can be translocated from the lungs to the central nervous system, the possible neurodegenerative effect of air pollution remains largely unexplored. The authors examined the relation between black carbon, a marker for traffic particles, and cognition among 202 Boston, Massachusetts, children (mean age = 9.7 years (standard deviation, 1.7)) in a prospective birth cohort study (1986--2001). Local black carbon levels were estimated using a validated spatiotemporal land-use regression model (mean predicted annual black carbon level, 0.56 µg/m3 (standard deviation, 0.13)). The Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test were administered for assessment of cognitive constructs. In analysis adjusting for sociodemographic factors, birth weight, blood lead level, and tobacco smoke exposure, black carbon (per interquartile-range increase) was associated with decreases in the vocabulary (--2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): --5.5, 1.1), matrices (--4.0, 95% CI: --7.6, --0.5), and composite intelligence quotient (--3.4, 95% CI: --6.6, --0.3) scores of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test and with decreases on the visual subscale (--5.4, 95% CI: --8.9, --1.9) and general index (--3.9, 95% CI: --7.5, --0.3) of the Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning. Higher levels of black carbon predicted decreased cognitive function across assessments of verbal and nonverbal intelligence and memory constructs. +!+ air pollution; child; cognition; intelligence; neurotoxicity syndromes; particulate matter; soot; vehicle emissions Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IQ, intelligence quotient; K-BIT, Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test; SD, standard deviation; WRAML, Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning S. Franco Suglia1, A. Gryparis2, R. O. 1,3, J. Schwartz1,3 and R. J. 3,4 1 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 2 Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Crete, Crete, Greece 3 Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 4 Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA Correspondence to Dr. Shakira Franco Suglia, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Landmark 415W, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215 (e-mail: sfranco{at}hsph.harvard.edu). +!+!+!+ *California's data challenge EPA* The Golden State filed suit on Wednesday for the right to limit greenhouse-gas emissions from autos. http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0104/p02s01-usgn.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.