Re: Crocs? They were so economic boom

[Guest guest]

Oh, no!  I better stock up!!! 

From: <@...>

Subject: Crocs? They were so economic boom

Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 9:47 AM

 

Crocs? They were so economic boom

It seemed everyone wore the colorful inexpensive foam clogs during the peak

years. Now they've clomped to the back of the closet and the company is

struggling to stay on its feet.

By Ylan Q. Mui for the L.A. Times July 23, 2009

http://www.latimes. com/la-fi- crocs23-2009jul2 3,0,4707800. story

Crocs were born of the economic boom.

The colorful foam clogs appeared in 2002, just as the country was recovering

from a recession. Brash and bright, they were a cheap investment (about $30)

that felt good and promised to last forever. Former President W. Bush

wore them. Aerosmith lead singer Tyler wore them. Your grandma wore them.

They were mocked by the fashion world, but 100 million pairs were sold in seven

years.

Then the boom times went bust, and Crocs went to the back of the closet.

The company had expanded to meet demand, but customers cut back. Last year Crocs

Inc. lost $185.1 million, slashed roughly 2,000 jobs and scrambled to pay down

millions in debt. Now it's stuck with a surplus of shoes, and its auditors have

wondered whether it can stay afloat. It has until the end of September to pay

off its debt.

" The company's toast, " said Damon Vickers, a fund manager at Nine Points Capital

Partners in Seattle.

Two summers ago, Fisher of Washington, D.C., bought two pairs of Crocs,

one green and one pink, for her daughters. The girls, now 8 and 12, wore them

constantly and even got charms to decorate the tops. This year, the shoes are

forgotten.

" They were their go-to, " Fisher said, " and now they're just really interested in

flip-flops. "

At the height of the real estate market, in 2006, the company sold shares to the

public, raising more than $200 million in the biggest stock offering in shoe

history. It ramped up manufacturing to keep up with demand, only then to find

that shoppers were snapping their wallets shut.

Weingarten, a trend and marketing expert, has relegated Crocs to the

wasteland of the comfort-shoe aisle. Maybe in a decade nostalgia will set in,

said Weingarten, author of " Career and Corporate Cool. " Then a pair of hot-pink

Crocs dug from the back of the closet might inspire misty-eyed memories:

" Remember when we had ugly, Flintstone-looking feet? "

Crocs not only had a look, they had a story. In 2002, three friends from

Boulder, Colo., got hold of technology developed in a Canadian laboratory that

created a lightweight, antimicrobial foam. They called it Croslite and molded it

into a boating and water-sports shoe they named Beach.

The shoes quickly developed a following among landlubbers as well. Gardeners

touted their stability, runners enjoyed their light feel, and the chairman of

the Crocs board wore them with his tuxedo.

The company used money from its public stock offering to diversify and acquire

new businesses, such as Jibbitz, which makes charms designed to fit Crocs'

ventilating holes, and Fury Hockey, which used Croslite to make sports gear. It

built manufacturing plants in Mexico and China and operated distribution centers

in the Netherlands and Japan. More than half of Crocs were sold outside the U.S.

Then Chief Executive Duerden wrote in an e-mail: " The industry was taken by

surprise by the severity of the downturn. It affected us more than most because

the brand had been gearing up for a continuation of the extraordinary growth in

the prior years. "

But the shoes were hitting a saturation point; the problem with a nearly

indestructible product is that shoppers rarely need to replace it.

A venture into Croslite clothing in 2007 fell flat. The company liquidated Fury

Hockey last year.

The company swung from a profit of $168.2 million in fiscal 2007 to a loss of

$185.1 million last year. In its annual report, Crocs said an independent

auditor expressed concerns about " conditions that raise substantial doubt about

our ability to continue. " Its stock price has plummeted 76%.

Duerden, who replaced CEO Ron Snyder five months ago, believes there is life yet

in Crocs and plans to market them to caterers, medical workers and people with

foot problems.

" The bottom line is, people talk about Crocs, " he said at a conference with

analysts. " They either love them or hate them, but it's in the vernacular. "

[Guest guest]

I think that the cheap Crocs-copies are to be blamed for the bad sales of real

Crocs. But foam slippers (Crocs or other brands) will survive. They are too

comfortable. Once you tried them, you can't live without them. I can't wear them

myself but my son lives in his Crocs (real Crocs flip-flops). He cried today

when I said he can't wear them for church.

Beata

[Guest guest]

Unfortunately I too loved my crocs, but just leaving the podiatrist office I had

two cracks, crevices on my soles due to no feeling in my feet. These shoes are

not good for us because our feet swim around and move so much when we walk

causing cracks and then infections. I always wore socks but that does not help.

Please advise all .

[Guest guest]

Hi Joyce,

 

Thank you for the cautionary note.  Ill-fitting shoes of any kind can be a

problem.  We need to guard our feet from injury and infection, similiar to what

diabetics need to do, because foot infections can be serious.  We need to make

sure shoes fit properly and then check our feet regularly for problems, like you

are doing.

 

But Crocs aren't necessarily 'bad' for all of us.  We are all different.  They

work for me.

 

I wear the Silver RX crocs (specially designed for people with feet issues). 

They are smooth inside.  I wear them without socks and haven't had any issues. 

However, my feet are wide, so the shoes don't slide around.  Also, I don't have

very much foot drop.  (I can see how some with significant foot drop could have

a problem with them catching on the floor.) 

 

For me, having a very solid, totally flat, wide base shoe is best.  I've had a

couple of doctors criticize my shoe choices (not Crocs, but others) because they

were too hard & flat.  However, my ankles are too weak for soft shoes and lots

of arch support simply strains my muscles and rolls my ankles to the side.  Who

needs tendonitis?  Not me anymore.  I'm gonna wear what works.  If I could walk

around barefooted all the time, that would be ideal.  Shoes are such a pain. 

Many times my own two feet can't even agree on what shoes are best. 

 

Certainly, Crocs aren't for everyone, but they can be safely worn by some of us!