WHO CAUGHT LYING IN PUBLIC OVER VACCINES

[Guest guest]

(regarding Jayne Donegan's case)

Now don't that beat all - WHO telling outright lies.

If you circulate this please include my address in England so WHO can try

to sue me - note the word " try " .

Sheri Nakken wrote:

http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/86/6/08-030608/en/index.html

Millions of deaths are prevented by vaccination every year, yet

public anxieties and vaccine scares that ignore rigorous science continue

to hamper immunization programmes. Jane Parry reports.

In the Donegan case before the UK's General Medical Council last August

in an exhaustive three week hearing involving 5 medical expert reports

and approaching 400 medical references, the absence of any

" science " was the most remarkable thing.

In particular, not a single paper was produced which established the

safety of any childhood vaccine in use in the UK. A witness of fact

who also was an expert in her own right regarding the testing of

pharmaceutical products confirmed also that what is considered the gold

standard of medical evidence - the placebo controlled randomised clinical

trial is simply not carried out on vaccines - yep, not even ones for

kids. And that was why the expert she sought out Dr Donegan,

for advice about whether to vaccinate her children.

Fortunately, Dr Donegan's advice on vaccination is the only advice

available in the UK which has been proven in rigorous detailed and

extensive legal proceedings to be valid. That cannot be said of the

advice from our Department of Health. Not only was Dr Donegan

acquitted by the GMC, but most unusually they found her defence proven to

the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.

Whenever WHO claim lives in the third world have been saved, they refer

to " estimates " - guess WHO produces those

" estimates " . And are " estimates " science?

Not in this case or in the case of WHO. But that is not all.

There is no " rigorous science " . Medical research is

medical research and not " science " even if they try hard to

pretend it is science. And medicine is not science either. And try

as hard as they can, I am not sure it is truly accurate to describe any

medical research as " rigorous " . Biological systems are a

little too uncertain to be rigorous about everything.

" Clifford G. "

--------------------------------------------------------

Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian

Homeopath

Vaccination Information & Choice Network, Nevada City CA & Wales

UK

Vaccines -

http://www.wellwithin1.com/vaccine.htm

Vaccine Dangers & Homeopathy Online/email courses