Guest guest Posted October 18, 2009 Report Share Posted October 18, 2009 This is what bugs me. 6 genes, more susceptibility, oxidative stress. a really bad exposure and maybe no bad genes and you still well get very ill, right?, lets say 1 bad gene, never caused problems your whole life, but a really bad exposure and your very ill. no way to really measure dose of exposure at ant given moment, which can change by the hour,day, with mold,myco/voc/mvoc/chemical exposure. now how much does the genes play in? just really, how much of a factor do these bad genes play when oxidative stress is bad and even the best genes/matabolism cant keep up with the exposure. I was expososed in 2 different situations, one for many years, it was bad but the 2nd exposure was worse and was the one where my defences couldn't keep up at all and bad things happened includeing MCS. mutiple allergies to molds, ?? and the breaking down of my brain barriors and head trauma that went beyond the brain fog exfects that were so gradual with my first exposure that I didn't even realize it was happening, only in hindsight can I see that my brain was getting a little foggy toward the end of that first exposure, but it was a gradual thing as it was in a airy victorian home, no insulation, so somewhat more of a deluted exposure I asume because it was airier. but becuse I had suffered a back /hip injury from work it seemed to concentrate on that area, and because I had had children and maybe the female organs were weaker, it concentrated on that area also, plus maybe some of that was do to the types of molds.mycos. the estrogen thing. I realize that it was probably working on my sinuses, damageing that area somewhat, but only suffered with stuffy nose and a few nose bleeds which was nothing compared to the second exposure. but I definitly fell that the first exposure was doing it's damage to organs and tissues but that had I not been exposed in the second exposure I would have recoved much better. so, when it comes to bad genes, does it play more of a role in a lower dose exposure setting? does that seem more reasonable? what about organ damage during a lower dose exposure .. is this because of the bad gene/matabolism? or is this more dependent on the types of chemicals involved? or in our case also molds and their toxins. I've read alot on this subject and what I get is that genitics play a very little role in this. so, seems that they might play in more if you get very ill from a low dose exposure but at a high dose exposure it might not make much difference. than theres 1 bad gene vs. six bad genes, the more bad genes the more susceptable, right? ?? seems there should be some way to deturmine a dose level and responce level based on each exposure and their number of bad genes. no bad genes would take a higher dose exposure, 6 bad genes would make you just as ill at a low dose exposure. is that right? so say you had 1 bad gene and was made very ill, wouldn't that pretty much show you had a very high dose exposure? exspecially if you had previously had what you consider a exposure that started as low dose and gradually over the years became a higher dose as things accumalated, but it still wasn't as high as the second exposure that caused illness and organ damage that the first exposure didn't cause. than you have to figure in the chemical/toxins theirself, a low dose of one chemical/toxin might do as much damage as a high dose of another chemical/toxin. well we ever be able to get this figured out or does it seem more reasonable to consentrate on the actual damage to our bodys and forget the whole dose vs genes. does the whole gene thing actually just complacate the issue? are we going to start getting blamed for our illness based on genitics like every other illness? many that have sence been proven not to be genitic at all? I just dont like the genitics being brought into this when all the answers are not there. just like so many other diseases. i do understand matabolism and it's role but even the best matabolism can get down, even with a cold or flu so really, how much does these bad genes make a difference enless maybe you have them all. but 1 or 2 ? this just bothers me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2009 Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 Jeannine: I cant answer all of your questions but I have asked them to Dr R because I was the only one to get sick in my home and my son is living there now. How he exlains it is that it is about your " total body burden " which is how much your body can handle before it starts to react or break down. The faster you can get rid of some of those toxins (I did sauna and IV) the better your body will be able to cope. Its the accumulation of toxins that will get you if you cannot get away from the mold/chemicals. As far as the bad genes, I have the genotype that makes no glutathione (missing the gene on both sides) and he said he sees that is amost ALL of his patients. So that would tell me that it was indeed a factor. I know I did not answer all your questions, hope this helped some. D > > This is what bugs me. 6 genes, more susceptibility, > oxidative stress. a really bad exposure and maybe no bad genes > and you still well get very ill, right?, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2009 Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 see what I'm saying? like the guy that dies from a massive exposure to aspergillus in his mulch pile, did genes play a role or did it not make a difference because it was a hgigh amount and his body just couldn't get rid of it fast enough. > > This is what bugs me. 6 genes, more susceptibility, > oxidative stress. a really bad exposure and maybe no bad genes > and you still well get very ill, right?, > lets say 1 bad gene, never caused problems your whole life, but a really bad exposure and your very ill. no way to really measure dose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2009 Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 Thanks D, so in actuallity, the more bad genes, the less dose of exposure it would take to reach the total body load. even some of these genes may differ in how they would effect the total body load. but with a high dose exposure it would make very little difference of you had any off these genes or not. sounds reasonable. I wonder too that maybe your son may tolerate it now because he's younger and stronger, but might suffer as he ages. it would be interesting to know if he has any of these bad genes. it would also be interesting to know if the exposure itself may acyually damage these genes that may not have been damaged before. there is info. out there on toxins actually damageing certain genes. there is also the fact that maybe one person getting sicker than another in the same house might depend on age and health but also maybe where the mold is in the heavist consentrations and maybe where you sleep, or maybe just who does most of the cleaning/vacumming around the house and actuall is stiring things up more and therefore breathing it more. theres just to many ands,if's and butt's here that's why it bothers me for anyone to put much account into bad genes. > > Jeannine: I cant answer all of your questions but I have asked them to Dr R because I was the only one to get sick in my home and my son is living there now. How he exlains it is that it is about your " total body burden " which is how much your body can handle before it starts to react or break down. T Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2009 Report Share Posted October 19, 2009 Diane, what kind of IV's did you take? Also, can you take glutathione to make up for fact you don't make it or how do you solve that? > > Jeannine: I cant answer all of your questions but I have asked them to Dr R because I was the only one to get sick in my home and my son is living there now. How he exlains it is that it is about your " total body burden " which is how much your body can handle before it starts to react or break down. The faster you can get rid of some of those toxins (I did sauna and IV) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 20, 2009 Report Share Posted October 20, 2009 Barb: My IVs were 30 gram of Vitamin C, magnesium, B complex and glutathione. I did them twice a week in Boston for a year. Yes you can take glutathione orally (I do) but I was told that you only absorb about 40% of it orally. Here in Dallas I injected 1 CC daily. That is the best way to go in my opinion because you can learn to do it yourself and save alot of money. D > > > > Jeannine: I cant answer all of your questions but I have asked them to Dr R because I was the only one to get sick in my home and my son is living there now. How he exlains it is that it is about your " total body burden " which is how much your body can handle before it starts to react or break down. The faster you can get rid of some of those toxins (I did sauna and IV) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 21, 2009 Report Share Posted October 21, 2009 Sam: It is called Detoxi Genomic Profile. It is done by Great Smokie Labs in Ashville, NC. I looked at my report and I do not have a phone # for them but you should be able to google Great Smokies Diagnostic Labs. D > > Diane, > Do you know the name of this test? > Thanks, > Sam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.