Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Not sure if you should rip out or not, but if you need protection, you can also pick up at Home Depot, disposable coveralls that you can wear and then throw away, Tyvec or other brand. Now are in paint department..all Home Depots are the same. Not expensive. > > Hi Alek, > > If you can see ONE wall of black mold, around your bathtub, it means that ALL of the walls around, and UNDER your bathtub, have black mold behind the tiles. For a thorough remediation, the tub should be taken out of the bathroom, and Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Joe, Excellent details for Alek. One improvement. Someone experienced in assessing mold jobs who will NOT be doing the work should determine the scope of the job. That scope is what 2-3 remediators should bid on. Otherwise each will have a different bid based on how much they decide to charge you. Typical ranges I've seen for a bathroom like you described would be from $900 to $6000 or more. Have them competitively bid apples to apples with the apple defined by someone who won't be doing the work and who has your personal needs in mind. All the rest is fine (with only minor quibbling!) <grin> Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > Hi Alek, > > If you can see ONE wall of black mold, around your bathtub, it means that ALL of the walls around, and > UNDER your bathtub, have black mold behind the tiles. For a thorough remediation, the tub should be taken > out of the bathroom, and turned upside down, to examine the bottom for mold. Then, with the tub removed, > start ripping off ALL the tiles around the bathtub, and keep ripping off tiles in the rest of the bathroom, both > walls and floor, and ceiling, until there is no visible mold. Then ripout the walls with the black mold. Then > examine, for visible mold, what was behind the walls, and repeat the above process. > > Now for the bad news. Any remediator, while doing this process, will start thinking that, ifhis bill, or > estimate, for the job, is veryhigh, (thorough jobs cost money), then you will tell him to postpone the work, > until you can get other estimates, from remediators who will " low-ball the estimate, to get the job. So, the > only way to make sure that a proper job is done, is to get multiple estimates, FROM THE GUY COMING > TOMORROW, based on different degrees of mold infestation he might encounter. > > Mold in a house, is like cancer in a body. The surgeon, or remediator, has to keep cutting, until it's all gone. > When the surgeon cuts, the patient has to be asleep. When the remediator cuts, you have to be awake, AND > WATCHING HIM DO THE JOB, to make sure that he doesn't start thinking, that he has cut enough, and he > can COVER UP the rest of the remaining mold, since he will figure that " a little bit of mold, covered so you > can't see it, will never harm you " . > > So, Alek, run to Home Depot, or Lowes, and buy the most expensive filter mask that they have for sale, for > YOU to wear, during the remediation process. The kind that auto/house paint sprayers wear, would be ideal. > If they don't have that type of mask, get some " NIOSH approved N95 " masks. The 3M brand comes in a box > of 20, for a reasonable price. Their stock number is " 8612F " . Throw out each mask after ONE USE, or the > mask, itself, can make you sick. > > The remediator WILL NOT, have an extra mask available, for you to wear. And if he did, he wouldn't tell you, > after you tell him that you will be looking over his shoulder all day. While at Home Depot, pick up a > flashlight, and large magnifying glass, if you don't already have them. You need to really inspect the > bathroom, AFTER the remediation, before you start putting things back together. > > Also, don't let the remediator, put any of the removed moldy stuff into any other room of your home, or you > willcross-contaminate those rooms also. Everything ripped out should go immediately out a window, or out > your door, to the outside. Do NOT carry out the moldy stuff yourself. Doing so, will make you sick, even > wearing a mask. > > Last, but not least, sleep in a HOTEL ROOM every night, until 2 days after the remediation is completed. > Until then, there will still be enough mold and mycotoxins floating in the air, to make you sick. When you get > back to your home, first throw out all carpeting and rugs in the house, as they will now contain a lethal > amount of mold and mycotoxins, which, from the remediation, can never be vacuumed enough to be safe. > Then AFTER the carpeting is thrown out, wet mop the entire house. Then, sometime after you have regained > your strength, wet wipe all the walls in the home, making sure that the air conditioning is on, during all wet > mopping and wet wiping, to avoid starting a mold growth on your walls and floor. > > So what are you doing still reading this email. Get to Home Depot, before they close. > > Joe > ................................................ ................ > > Posted by: " Alek Rogachova " alekrog@... alekrog > Mon Sep7,2009 5:15pm (PDT) > Hi, > > I'm sorry- don't mean to stray from this topic, but I have a question regarding this post. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 I did not see an original post. At 05:14 PM 9/8/2009, you wrote: >If you can see ONE wall of black mold, around your bathtub, it means that ALL of the walls around, and UNDER your bathtub, have black mold behind the tiles. The remediation instructions are good ones. However, the mold genre needs to be determined. There are two types of black mold. The one that is truly ugly is called " Black Mold " as a formal name. The other one is what lay people will see every day in most bathrooms. They are not the same. Far different. The every day mold that are small black dots can be cleaned off with scrubbing with soapy water, or clorox, if you must. No special face mask is needed for this every day type of black colored mold. As the cost difference is huge, you better be sure which you have. WARNING: Black Mold has deadly spores. Do not inhale them. Black Mold is mostly a northern mid west of the USA issue. http://www.google.com/search?q=black+mold Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Carl and Joe, Thanks for knocking some sense into me. I've been putting the remediation off, but now I realize I need to get rid of the mold ASAP. Great suggestions, I wasn't aware of half this stuff, and we did get the N95 masks tonight. My girlfriend called several mold remediators for estimates. The ones that sounded knowledgeable said they would spray fungicides and/or anti-microbials behind where they tear out the wall. A few said industrial grade fungicides, and one said a " Bactine-like product " . My girlfriend is chemically sensitive and if they spray these, I don't think she'll ever be able to come over again. They told her the spraying of their fungicides & antimicrobials is non-negotiable. Does this sound right? Is there an alternative to this either of you can recommend? Thanks, Alek From: Carl E. Grimes <grimes@...> Subject: Re: [] Alek, Run to Home Depot Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 2:24 AM Joe, Excellent details for Alek. One improvement. Someone experienced in assessing mold jobs who will NOT be doing the work should determine the scope of the job. That scope is what 2-3 remediators should bid on. Otherwise each will have a different bid based on how much they decide to charge you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Carl & Alek, To Alek first, if you do decide to stand over the remediators should there are a few things that should be stated that I haven't seen covered so far. If you are in the location where the mold is being agitated then your clothing will be covered with mold spores and mycotoxins this is why personal protective equipment (PPE) should be worn at all times during mold remediation like a Tyvek suite which would need to be disposed of after use. Also you should cover any mucus membrane and orifice as mold spores can get into ears and eyes and cause issues in these locations as well. Finally make sure that the breathing mask is rated for the filtration of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This should be stated on the outside of the box or cartridges that you purchase and any N95 rated mask would be sufficient. The 3M half or full face mask with P-100 cartridges is good. Carl: This is where the use of Dr. Close's protocol would actually save money, and why it can be more effective. " Last, but not least, sleep in a HOTEL ROOM every night, until 2 days after the remediation is completed. Until then, there will still be enough mold and mycotoxins floating in the air, to make you sick. When you get back to your home, first throw out all carpeting and rugs in the house, as they will now contain a lethal amount of mold and mycotoxins, which, from the remediation, can never be vacuumed enough to be safe. Then AFTER the carpeting is thrown out, wet mop the entire house. Then, sometime after you have regained your strength, wet wipe all the walls in the home, making sure that the air conditioning is on, during all wet mopping and wet wiping, to avoid starting a mold growth on your walls and floor. " *NOTE* The below statement is for example purposes only to continue a dialog with Mr. Grimes about the use of a protocol Dr. close has developed. It is not intended to be a statement of what will or even could happen, just a reflection of the statements made and the difference between what is accepted now and the protocol we are discussing. The fact that all of the carpeting & rugs should be removed and disposed of should not be necessary, and if this is industry best practices would again validate Dr. Close in his statement that this could save a considerable amount of money during remediation and would make his protocol superior. With the use of Thieves oils being diffused the mold spores being thrown into the air should be destroyed before they spread to other parts of the house. Again this will get back to the information that Dr. Close will be sending you privately, I am just using this post as an example so that you can see to some extent why we feel his protocol is better. Also going on the assumption that you would need to remove any carpeting and rugs from the house, this would also mean that either you would have to throw away all of your cloths, bed sheets, comforters, and any other cloth or porous material in your house or you would have to wash everything thoroughly in some type of anti-fungal agent. In addition you would have to have HEPA filtration after all of this to get any mold spores that were floating in the air. As I believe there are some forms of aspergillus that have been proven to remain in the air for up to 48 hours, not to mention potential for additional cross contamination from removal of carpets and rugs and cleaning of said clothing, assuming they have lethal levels of mycotoxins and mold spores in them. So if you are looking at cost your costs have gone let say from a median of $2500 to remove the contaminated material from your bathroom, to the increased cost of replacing all the carpet in your house, getting a HEPA filtration system, the time spent in the home cleaning and wiping down the walls with wet wipes, the potential loss of clothing or expense of thorough cleaning, and the possibility that you will still get sick for a while. If you total all of that up you could be looking at assuming the HEPA filter only needs to run for 1 day an additional $500 - $1000 in expenses for the remediation, this is assuming time is money as well. After that then you have the added expense of re-flooring any room where carpet was with either carpet or some form of flooring and then you still have to put your bathroom back together. Josh > > Joe, Excellent details for Alek. One improvement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 originally posted to a different thread Posted by: " Alek Rogachova " alekrog@... alekrog Mon Sep 7, 2009 5:15 pm (PDT) Hi, I'm sorry- don't mean to stray from this topic, but I have a question regarding this post. , would you be able to explain to me (simplified version is fine) about how the mycotoxins will still be around even if mold is removed? Or if you could point me to a file... I tried googling this but can't find this information. This weekend I started to re-caulk my tub, found a whole wall of black mold behind the tiles. Lived in a moldy house before, so I've been through that health nightmare... want to get this remediated ASAP. Just want to make sure it's done correctly. I have a guy coming tomorrow who says he's a certified mold remediator.. . I'm willing to rip out the entire bathroom and walls if I need to, is this enough to eliminate the mycotoxins? Thanks for any information you might be able to provide- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Black Mold is also an issue in the lowest southern State (hurricane alley) If it is Black Mold you will not only need a respirator, but also goggles and a tyveck suit as it is absorbed threw skin, eyes and respiratory systems. God Bless !! dragonflymcs Mayleen ________________________________ From: <pete-@...> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:25:32 PM Subject: Re: [] Alek, Run to Home Depot I did not see an original post. At 05:14 PM 9/8/2009, you wrote: >If you can see ONE wall of black mold, around your bathtub, it means that ALL of the walls around, and UNDER your bathtub, have black mold behind the tiles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 , Sorry, are you alright? You usually are " right on " but this one is all wrong, especially considering your past posts. * All mold can be removed the same way. * There are about 20,000 species of black mold, not two. * Knowing the species is sometimes important but the genus is insufficient identification for such danger as you state. E.g. Stachybotrys (genus) is insufficient as there are several species. Chartarum is the species of concern. * Black Mold is NOT a formal name. It is a generic " made up " description which has captured the imagination and fears of us people and the media to the point of becoming a " name. " * If " Black Mold " is so dangerous you ought to tell us which of the genus and species it is, otherwise we have no way of knowing how to avoid death. * No mold spores are inherently deadly. Although any mold spore in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong person can be. And not always through inhalation. I'd be more concerned about inhaling Aspergillus versicolor and A. fumigatus than I would be be S. chartarum. But I'd rather touch them and not touch S. chartarum. * Stachybotrys chartarum is what is commonly referred as the " toxic killer black mold " and it is not regional. It will grow anywhere there is moisture for prolonged time on a cellulose food source such as cardboard boxes and sheet rock. It is more prevalent in hot, humid climates such as Texas & Florida. But semi-arid, dry Colorado has more than it's share. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > > I did not see an original post. > > At 05:14 PM 9/8/2009, you wrote: > >If you can see ONE wall of black mold, around your bathtub, it means that ALL of the walls around, and > UNDER your bathtub, have black mold behind the tiles. > > The remediation instructions are good ones. > > However, the mold genre needs to be determined. There are two types of black mold. > > The one that is truly ugly is called " Black Mold " as a formal name. > The other one is what lay people will see every day in most bathrooms. > > They are not the same. Far different. > > The every day mold that are small black dots can be cleaned off with > scrubbing with soapy water, or clorox, if you must. No special face > mask is needed for this every day type of black colored mold. > > As the cost difference is huge, you better be sure which you have. > WARNING: Black Mold has deadly spores. Do not inhale them. > > Black Mold is mostly a northern mid west of the USA issue. > > http://www.google.com/search? q=black+mold > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 I have seen MSDS on these, the ones I saw were high irritants, if she has MCS then she would not be able to enter again. Ask for the MSDS ahead so you have time before use to determine if these are going to affect you and her. Ask for licenses, not all remediators are legit. Maybe someone here can help depending on where you are. Lowes, HD sells a 3m half respirator. They also sell the canisters for them. They have the tyveck suit but without the hood, there is a seperate piece for the head. God Bless !! dragonflymcs Mayleen ________________________________ From: Alek Rogachova <alekrog@...> Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 11:46:35 PM Subject: Re: [] Alek, Run to Home Depot Carl and Joe, Thanks for knocking some sense into me. I've been putting the remediation off, but now I realize I need to get rid of the mold Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Alek, If spraying anything, especially with a chemically intolerant occupant, is non-negotiable then don't negotiate by not hiring them. In fact, if any part of the remediation is non-negotiable and they won't discuss it, don't hire them unless they first sign a written document accepting all medical liabilty for the life of you and your girl friend. Non-negotiable usually means " I'm forcing you to accept my methods because if you don't you'll get even sicker. " It's fear based, not knowledge based, and cerainly not with your needs in mind. You need someone who understands the consensus standards (which are minimums, not maximums) and who is also willing to find out the needs of you and your girlfriend before doing anything. The standards they use should be clearly identified and explained to your satisfaction. They should then be adjusted to meet your individual needs. Without that, you risk joining the ranks of most on this group who hired a remediator in good faith only to have that trust violated. (Usually through ignorance, occasionally with malice). The only " standards " which insist on using fungicides are those written by companies whose business is based on using them. All cognizant authorities strongly caution against the use of fungicides for several reasons: * They don't kill most of the mold. * Dead mold is still a health problem. * If the mold is removed there is nothing to kill. * Fungicides and anti-microbials are designed to kill life forms. People are life forms. The dose for mold is not high enough to kill us but it sure can make us sick. Some of us remain sick for years. Why replace a mold problem with a chemical problem? Remove the problem. There is a time and a place for anti-microbials, especially with sewage. But not for mold. I challenge anyone to find an authoritative source which is independent of a product that advocates the use of fungicides as non-negotiable or even preferable. Although of Thieves Oil advocates diffusing their product, he also insists on first removing the mold. Where we disagree is how to remove the mold from the air. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > > > Carl and Joe, > > Thanks for knocking some sense into me. I've been putting the remediation off, but now I realize I need to > get rid of the mold ASAP. Great suggestions, I wasn't aware of half this stuff, and we did get the N95 masks > tonight. > > My girlfriend called several mold remediators for estimates. The ones that sounded knowledgeable said they > would spray fungicides and/or anti-microbials behind where they tear out the wall. A few said industrial > grade fungicides, and one said a " Bactine-like product " . My girlfriend is chemically sensitive and if they > spray these, I don't think she'll ever be able to come over again. > > They told her the spraying of their fungicides & antimicrobials is non-negotiable. Does this sound right? Is > there an alternative to this either of you can recommend? > > Thanks, > Alek > > > > From: Carl E. Grimes <grimes@...> > Subject: Re: [] Alek, Run to Home Depot > groups (DOT) com > Date: Wednesday, September 9, 2009, 2:24 AM > > Joe, > > Excellent details for Alek. One improvement. Someone > > experienced in assessing mold jobs who will NOT be doing the > > work should determine the scope of the job. That scope is what > > 2-3 remediators should bid on. Otherwise each will have a > > different bid based on how much they decide to charge you. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Thank, Josh. I look forward to receiving the information. For the record, it was not me who said carpets must be removed. S520 is quite clear about this. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- > > > Carl & Alek, > > To Alek first, if you do decide to stand over the remediators should there are a few things that should be > stated that I haven't seen covered so far. If you are in the location where the mold is being agitated then your > clothing will be covered with mold spores and mycotoxins this is why personal protective equipment (PPE) > should be worn at all times during mold remediation like a Tyvek suite which would need to be disposed of > after use. Also you should cover any mucus membrane and orifice as mold spores can get into ears and eyes > and cause issues in these locations as well. Finally make sure that the breathing mask is rated for the > filtration of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). This should be stated on the outside of the box or > cartridges that you purchase and any N95 rated mask would be sufficient. The 3M half or full face mask with > P-100 cartridges is good. > > Carl: This is where the use of Dr. Close's protocol would actually save money, and why it can be more > effective. > > " Last, but not least, sleep in a HOTEL ROOM every night, until 2 days after the remediation is completed. > Until then, there will still be enough mold and mycotoxins floating in the air, to make you sick. When you get > back to your home, first throw out all carpeting and rugs in the house, as they will now contain a lethal > amount of mold and mycotoxins, which, from the remediation, can never be vacuumed enough to be safe. > Then AFTER the carpeting is thrown out, wet mop the entire house. Then, sometime after you have regained > your strength, wet wipe all the walls in the home, making sure that the air conditioning is on, during all wet > mopping and wet wiping, to avoid starting a mold growth on your walls and floor. " > > *NOTE* The below statement is for example purposes only to continue a dialog with Mr. Grimes about the > use of a protocol Dr. close has developed. It is not intended to be a statement of what will or even could > happen, just a reflection of the statements made and the difference between what is accepted now and the > protocol we are discussing. > > The fact that all of the carpeting & rugs should be removed and disposed of should not be necessary, and if > this is industry best practices would again validate Dr. Close in his statement that this could save a > considerable amount of money during remediation and would make his protocol superior. With the use of > Thieves oils being diffused the mold spores being thrown into the air should be destroyed before they spread > to other parts of the house. Again this will get back to the information that Dr. Close will be sending you > privately, I am just using this post as an example so that you can see to some extent why we feel his protocol > is better. Also going on the assumption that you would need to remove any carpeting and rugs from the > house, this would also mean that either you would have to throw away all of your cloths, bed sheets, > comforters, and any other cloth or porous material in your house or you would have to wash everything > thoroughly in some type of anti-fungal agent. In addition you would ha > Josh > > > > > > Joe, Excellent details for Alek. One improvement. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Carl, what do you do after a sewer line back up with antimicrobial? Not to ask for too lengthy an answer though as I do not have one now. I ask because when I moved back to this area in 1990, my greataunt who was living here had had several sewerline backups and was too old and frail health to deal with it, so I had the plumbing repaired and I don't remember doing anything else. It backed up in her basement, which is now *mine. Didn't know anything about any of this then. Workmen who were here probably just sprayed area down. I put all the wood furniture that was down there at the time to the curb and more than ten years later, when I joined this group, removed the carpeting from the basement steps, although water did not reach carpet, but removed it out concern for the possible airbourne contaminants that might have been in carpet from the flooding, which hung around for days at a time due to my greataunts dimentia. She'd forget the basement was flooded until I came over the discovered it. Just curious, should biocide have been sprayed of whole house, and everyone leave the house or something? >> The only " standards " which insist on using fungicides are those > written by companies whose business is based on using them. > > There is a time and a place for anti-microbials, especially with > sewage. But not for mold. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Carl and All Others; I have posted on this subject several times before. You are all missing the point of indoor pollution from microbial growht and water damage. There is much more than just mold spores. I have copied an abstract regarding this issue and pasted below. The fine and ultrafine particles shed by both bacteria and mold colonies are among the major problems. These also contain the toxins of both bacteria and molds. They permeated and attach to materials in the environment. Oils will not get rid of this fraction. I will lay odds that Dr. Close has not even examined this aspect of indoor contamination. I urge you people to read, read and read some more to understand the magniftude of this problem. The ultrafine particles enter the systemic circulation via athe lungs and into the brain via the olfactory nerve and tract. Also see: http://aem.asm.org/cgi/reprint/74/3/585 I suggest that you go to Google.com, type in Reponen fungal fragments and be surprised. 1: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jan 1;407(2):806-14. Epub 2008 Nov 13. Links Size-fractionated (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan concentrations aerosolized from different moldy building materials. Seo SC, Reponen T, Levin L, Grinshpun SA. Center for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0056, USA. Release of submicrometer-sized fungal fragments (<1.0 (micron) was discovered in earlier studies, which investigated the aerosolization of spores from moldy surfaces. However, the contribution of fungal fragments to total mold exposure is poorly characterized. The purpose of this study was to investigate the size-fractionated concentrations of particulate (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan and numbers of particles aerosolized from the surface of artificially mold-contaminated materials using a novel sampling methodology. Aspergillus versicolor and Stachybotrys chartarum were grown on malt extract agar and building materials (ceiling tiles and gypsum board) for one to six months. Fungal particles released from these materials were collected size-selectively by a newly developed Fragment Sampling System, and (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan in air samples was analyzed by Limulus Amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay. The concentrations of (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan varied from 0.4x10(0) to 9.8x10(2) ng m(-3) in the fragment size and from 1.0x10(1) to 4.7x10(4) ng m(-3) in the spore size range. Numbers of submicrometer-sized particles aerosolized from 6-month old cultures were always significantly higher that those from 1-month old (P<0.001). This can be attributed to increased dryness on the surface of material samples and an increase in fungal biomass over time. The average fragment to spore ratios both in particle numbers and (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan mass were higher for S. chartarum than for A. versicolor. The results indicate that long-term mold damage in buildings may lead to increased contribution of fragments to the total mold exposure. Therefore, the health impact of these particles may be even greater than that of spores, considering the strong association between numbers of fine particles and adverse health effects reported in other studies. Furthermore, the contribution of fragments may vary between species and appears to be higher for S. chartarum than for A. versicolor. Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D. Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist www.drthrasher.org toxicologist1@... Off: 916-745-4703 Cell: 575-937-1150 L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC Trauma Specialist sandracrawley@... 916-745-4703 - Off 775-309-3994 - Cell This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Please everyone listen to the experts on this important topic as I physically know very well what all those particals and mold toxins , by-products, bacteria, etc can do to a person's body. God Bless !! dragonflymcs Mayleen ________________________________ From: " Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. " <toxicologist1@...> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2009 10:40:36 AM Subject: [] Re: Alek, Run to Home Depot Carl and All Others; I have posted on this subject several times before. You are all missing the point of indoor pollution from microbial growht and water damage. There is much more than just mold spores. I have copied an abstract regarding this issue and pasted below. The fine and ultrafine particles shed by both bacteria and mold colonies are among the major problems. These also contain the toxins of both bacteria and molds. They permeated and attach to materials in the environment. Oils will not get rid of this fraction. I will lay odds that Dr. Close has not even examined this aspect of indoor contamination. I urge you people to read, read and read some more to understand the magniftude of this problem. The ultrafine particles enter the systemic circulation via athe lungs and into the brain via the olfactory nerve and tract. Also see: http://aem.asm. org/cgi/reprint/ 74/3/585 I suggest that you go to Google.com, type in Reponen fungal fragments and be surprised. 1: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jan 1;407(2):806- 14. Epub 2008 Nov 13. Links Size-fractionated (1-->3)-beta- D-glucan concentrations aerosolized from different moldy building materials. Seo SC, Reponen T, Levin L, Grinshpun SA. Center for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0056, USA. Release of submicrometer- sized fungal fragments (<1.0 (micron) was discovered in earlier studies, which investigated the aerosolization of spores from moldy surfaces. However, the contribution of fungal fragments to total mold exposure is poorly characterized. The purpose of this study was to investigate the size-fractionated concentrations of particulate (1-->3)-beta- D-glucan and numbers of particles aerosolized from the surface of artificially mold-contaminated materials using a novel sampling methodology. Aspergillus versicolor and Stachybotrys chartarum were grown on malt extract agar and building materials (ceiling tiles and gypsum board) for one to six months. Fungal particles released from these materials were collected size-selectively by a newly developed Fragment Sampling System, and (1-->3)-beta- D-glucan in air samples was analyzed by Limulus Amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay. The concentrations of (1-->3)-beta- D-glucan varied from 0.4x10(0) to 9.8x10(2) ng m(-3) in the fragment size and from 1.0x10(1) to 4.7x10(4) ng m(-3) in the spore size range. Numbers of submicrometer- sized particles aerosolized from 6-month old cultures were always significantly higher that those from 1-month old (P<0.001). This can be attributed to increased dryness on the surface of material samples and an increase in fungal biomass over time. The average fragment to spore ratios both in particle numbers and (1-->3)-beta- D-glucan mass were higher for S. chartarum than for A. versicolor. The results indicate that long-term mold damage in buildings may lead to increased contribution of fragments to the total mold exposure. Therefore, the health impact of these particles may be even greater than that of spores, considering the strong association between numbers of fine particles and adverse health effects reported in other studies. Furthermore, the contribution of fragments may vary between species and appears to be higher for S. chartarum than for A. versicolor. Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D. Toxicologist/ Immunotoxicologi st/Fetaltoxicolo gist www.drthrasher. org toxicologist1@ msn.com Off: 916-745-4703 Cell: 575-937-1150 L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC Trauma Specialist sandracrawley@ msn.com 916-745-4703 - Off 775-309-3994 - Cell This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 --- Carl: Thank you for clearing this up, I knew it was " all wrong " as far as everything I had read. Glad you are paying attention and giving us the correct information. D In , " Carl E. Grimes " <grimes@...> wrote: > > , > > Sorry, are you alright? You usually are " right on " but this one is all > wrong, especially considering your past posts. > > * All mold can be removed the same way. > * There are about 20,000 species of black mold, not two. > * Knowing the species is sometimes important but the > genus is insufficient identification for such danger as you > state. E.g. Stachybotrys (genus) is insufficient as there > are several species. Chartarum is the species of concern. > * Black Mold is NOT a formal name. It is a generic " made > up " description which has captured the imagination and > fears of us people and the media to the point of becoming > a " name. " > * If " Black Mold " is so dangerous you ought to tell us which > of the genus and species it is, otherwise we have no way > of knowing how to avoid death. > * No mold spores are inherently deadly. Although any mold > spore in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong > person can be. And not always through inhalation. I'd be > more concerned about inhaling Aspergillus versicolor and > A. fumigatus than I would be be S. chartarum. But I'd > rather touch them and not touch S. chartarum. > * Stachybotrys chartarum is what is commonly referred as > the " toxic killer black mold " and it is not regional. It will > grow anywhere there is moisture for prolonged time on a > cellulose food source such as cardboard boxes and sheet > rock. It is more prevalent in hot, humid climates such as > Texas & Florida. But semi-arid, dry Colorado has more > than it's share. > > Carl Grimes > Healthy Habitats LLC > > ----- > > > > I did not see an original post. > > > > At 05:14 PM 9/8/2009, you wrote: > > >If you can see ONE wall of black mold, around your bathtub, it means that ALL of the walls around, and > > UNDER your bathtub, have black mold behind the tiles. > > > > The remediation instructions are good ones. > > > > However, the mold genre needs to be determined. There are two types of black mold. > > > > The one that is truly ugly is called " Black Mold " as a formal name. > > The other one is what lay people will see every day in most bathrooms. > > > > They are not the same. Far different. > > > > The every day mold that are small black dots can be cleaned off with > > scrubbing with soapy water, or clorox, if you must. No special face > > mask is needed for this every day type of black colored mold. > > > > As the cost difference is huge, you better be sure which you have. > > WARNING: Black Mold has deadly spores. Do not inhale them. > > > > Black Mold is mostly a northern mid west of the USA issue. > > > > http://www.google.com/search? q=black+mold > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Dr. Thrasher, I have not seen your posts on this subject prior to this. I have looked at the abstract that you posted and in truth it is beyond my knowledge to comment on, I have however forwarded the information to Dr. Close to look at and I did talk to him about it. He has in fact taken into consideration that particulate matter is something to take into consideration when dealing with a moldy or mold infested home. However on a practical level this is not something that we have had the funding to examine in detail. There has been evidence in the samples taken by Dr. Close that particulate matter is reduced but for the most part examination of the effects of Thieves Oil on the particulate matter was outside the scope of work performed. Also you stated that these were less than 1 micron in size. In regards to that when diffusing the Thieves oil with tested diffusers the Thieves oil is atomized and aerosolized at 200 to 700 picometers or .0002 to .0007 microns which means that the Thieves oil particles are of a sufficient size and if diffused sufficiently fill the room to saturation so that they can deal with all mold spores and particulate matter. That being said again the testing of the effects of Thieves oil was outside the scope of work performed. On another note, the Thieves oil has been tested for its antibacterial properties using an ATP meter. These test were done by an independent source and a copy of the data was sent to Dr. Close, and has proven to be an effective at killing bacteria as well. Josh --- In , " Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. " <toxicologist1@...> wrote: > > Carl and All Others; I have posted on this subject several times before. You are all missing the point of indoor pollution from microbial growht and water damage. There is much more than just mold spores. I have copied an abstract regarding this issue and pasted below. The fine and ultrafine particles shed by both bacteria and mold colonies are among the major problems. These also contain the toxins of both bacteria and molds. They permeated and attach to materials in the environment. Oils will not get rid of this fraction. I will lay odds that Dr. Close has not even examined this aspect of indoor contamination. I urge you people to read, read and read some more to understand the magniftude of this problem. The ultrafine particles enter the systemic circulation via athe lungs and into the brain via the olfactory nerve and tract. > > Also see: http://aem.asm.org/cgi/reprint/74/3/585 > > I suggest that you go to Google.com, type in Reponen fungal fragments and be surprised. > 1: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jan 1;407(2):806-14. Epub 2008 Nov 13. Links > > Size-fractionated (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan concentrations aerosolized from different moldy building materials. > > Seo SC, Reponen T, Levin L, Grinshpun SA. > > Center for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0056, USA. > > Release of submicrometer-sized fungal fragments (<1.0 (micron) was discovered in earlier studies, which investigated the aerosolization of spores from moldy surfaces. However, the contribution of fungal fragments to total mold exposure is poorly characterized. The purpose of this study was to investigate the size-fractionated concentrations of particulate (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan and numbers of particles aerosolized from the surface of artificially mold-contaminated materials using a novel sampling methodology. Aspergillus versicolor and Stachybotrys chartarum were grown on malt extract agar and building materials (ceiling tiles and gypsum board) for one to six months. Fungal particles released from these materials were collected size-selectively by a newly developed Fragment Sampling System, and (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan in air samples was analyzed by Limulus Amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay. The concentrations of (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan varied from 0.4x10(0) to 9.8x10(2) ng m(-3) in the fragment size and from 1.0x10(1) to 4.7x10(4) ng m(-3) in the spore size range. Numbers of submicrometer-sized particles aerosolized from 6-month old cultures were always significantly higher that those from 1-month old (P<0.001). This can be attributed to increased dryness on the surface of material samples and an increase in fungal biomass over time. The average fragment to spore ratios both in particle numbers and (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan mass were higher for S. chartarum than for A. versicolor. The results indicate that long-term mold damage in buildings may lead to increased contribution of fragments to the total mold exposure. Therefore, the health impact of these particles may be even greater than that of spores, considering the strong association between numbers of fine particles and adverse health effects reported in other studies. Furthermore, the contribution of fragments may vary between species and appears to be higher for S. chartarum than for A. versicolor. > > > > > Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D. > Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist > www.drthrasher.org > toxicologist1@... > Off: 916-745-4703 > Cell: 575-937-1150 > > > L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC > Trauma Specialist > sandracrawley@... > 916-745-4703 - Off > 775-309-3994 - Cell > > > > > This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Barb, Short, general answer. Sewage is very different from mold. The main concerns are disease causing (pathogenic) bacteria, virus such as Hepatitus, and blood borne pathogens. I forget the numbers but the original studies on sewage (Burroughs and Cole) found on average about 80 pathogens in typical sewage. This is " pathogens " not " allergens " or " CNS interference. " They don't easily become airborne and most die relatively quickly when dry. (Some virus, including flu virus, can stay viable 2-3 days on surfaces. Molds for centuries). The potential for sewage related infections is greater than for mold, but risk doesn't persist like mold because infectious agents need to stay alive to infect people. Most die quickly. Route of exposure is more limited than for mold. Once dead they can't infect. The same is true for mold but the health effects from mold aren't limited to infection. In fact, mold infection is usually the least likely concern. It's the exposure to all the non-infectious components and emmanations from mold growth which are so troublesome. I wouldn't worry about disease from sewage backup that old. If the immediate area was flushed with water (typical) most would be washed away. Any anti-microbials should be applied only after the thorough cleaning - per FIFRA. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- Carl, what do you do after a sewer line back up with antimicrobial? Not to ask for too lengthy an answer though as I do not have one now. I ask because when I moved back to this area in 1990, my greataunt who was living here had had several sewerline backups and was too old and frail health to deal with it, so I had the plumbing repaired and I don't remember doing anything else. It backed up in her basement, which is now *mine. Didn't know anything about any of this then. Workmen who were here probably just sprayed area down. I put all the wood furniture that was down there at the time to the curb and more than ten years later, when I joined this group, removed the carpeting from the basement steps, although water did not reach carpet, but removed it out concern for the possible airbourne contaminants that might have been in carpet from the flooding, which hung around for days at a time due to my greataunts dimentia. She'd forget the basement was flooded until I came over the discovered it. Just curious, should biocide have been sprayed of whole house, and everyone leave the house or something? >> The only " standards " which insist on using fungicides are those > written by companies whose business is based on using them. > > There is a time and a place for anti-microbials, especially with > sewage. But not for mold. > > ---------- The following section of this message contains a file attachment prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format. If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system, you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer. If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance. ---- File information ----------- File: DEFAULT.BMP Date: 16 Jun 2009, 0:10 Size: 358 bytes. Type: Unknown Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 As a follow up I realized that I stated the size of the atomized thieves oil as fact, and I should not have done this. The size is according to the specifications of the manufacturer and has not been verified. Josh > > Dr. Thrasher, > > I have not seen your posts on this subject prior to this. I have looked at the abstract that you posted and in truth it is beyond my knowledge to comment on, I have however forwarded the information to Dr. Close to look at and I did talk to him about it. He has in fact taken into consideration that particulate matter is something to take into consideration when dealing with a moldy or mold infested home. However on a practical level this is not something that we have had the funding to examine in detail. There has been evidence in the samples taken by Dr. Close that particulate matter is reduced but for the most part examination of the effects of Thieves Oil on the particulate matter was outside the scope of work performed. > Also you stated that these were less than 1 micron in size. In regards to that when diffusing the Thieves oil with tested diffusers the Thieves oil is atomized and aerosolized at 200 to 700 picometers or .0002 to .0007 microns which means that the Thieves oil particles are of a sufficient size and if diffused sufficiently fill the room to saturation so that they can deal with all mold spores and particulate matter. That being said again the testing of the effects of Thieves oil was outside the scope of work performed. > On another note, the Thieves oil has been tested for its antibacterial properties using an ATP meter. These test were done by an independent source and a copy of the data was sent to Dr. Close, and has proven to be an effective at killing bacteria as well. > > Josh > > > --- In , " Jack Thrasher, Ph.D. " <toxicologist1@> wrote: > > > > Carl and All Others; I have posted on this subject several times before. You are all missing the point of indoor pollution from microbial growht and water damage. There is much more than just mold spores. I have copied an abstract regarding this issue and pasted below. The fine and ultrafine particles shed by both bacteria and mold colonies are among the major problems. These also contain the toxins of both bacteria and molds. They permeated and attach to materials in the environment. Oils will not get rid of this fraction. I will lay odds that Dr. Close has not even examined this aspect of indoor contamination. I urge you people to read, read and read some more to understand the magniftude of this problem. The ultrafine particles enter the systemic circulation via athe lungs and into the brain via the olfactory nerve and tract. > > > > Also see: http://aem.asm.org/cgi/reprint/74/3/585 > > > > I suggest that you go to Google.com, type in Reponen fungal fragments and be surprised. > > 1: Sci Total Environ. 2009 Jan 1;407(2):806-14. Epub 2008 Nov 13. Links > > > > Size-fractionated (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan concentrations aerosolized from different moldy building materials. > > > > Seo SC, Reponen T, Levin L, Grinshpun SA. > > > > Center for Health-Related Aerosol Studies, Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0056, USA. > > > > Release of submicrometer-sized fungal fragments (<1.0 (micron) was discovered in earlier studies, which investigated the aerosolization of spores from moldy surfaces. However, the contribution of fungal fragments to total mold exposure is poorly characterized. The purpose of this study was to investigate the size-fractionated concentrations of particulate (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan and numbers of particles aerosolized from the surface of artificially mold-contaminated materials using a novel sampling methodology. Aspergillus versicolor and Stachybotrys chartarum were grown on malt extract agar and building materials (ceiling tiles and gypsum board) for one to six months. Fungal particles released from these materials were collected size-selectively by a newly developed Fragment Sampling System, and (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan in air samples was analyzed by Limulus Amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay. The concentrations of (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan varied from 0.4x10(0) to 9.8x10(2) ng m(-3) in the fragment size and from 1.0x10(1) to 4.7x10(4) ng m(-3) in the spore size range. Numbers of submicrometer-sized particles aerosolized from 6-month old cultures were always significantly higher that those from 1-month old (P<0.001). This can be attributed to increased dryness on the surface of material samples and an increase in fungal biomass over time. The average fragment to spore ratios both in particle numbers and (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan mass were higher for S. chartarum than for A. versicolor. The results indicate that long-term mold damage in buildings may lead to increased contribution of fragments to the total mold exposure. Therefore, the health impact of these particles may be even greater than that of spores, considering the strong association between numbers of fine particles and adverse health effects reported in other studies. Furthermore, the contribution of fragments may vary between species and appears to be higher for S. chartarum than for A. versicolor. > > > > > > > > > > Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D. > > Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist > > www.drthrasher.org > > toxicologist1@ > > Off: 916-745-4703 > > Cell: 575-937-1150 > > > > > > L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC > > Trauma Specialist > > sandracrawley@ > > 916-745-4703 - Off > > 775-309-3994 - Cell > > > > > > > > > > This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 I ask the list owners to investigate how this terrible long thread with no apparent original poster is turning some of the well respected list members into an uproar, when nothing of the sort is justified. Do I smell a rat? Is anyone replying to original post? Or is there a troll, or two, on the list? Causing upset? -- Holy smokes!!! Everyone misread my posted words? Clarifications below. -- My goal is to help individuals, first and foremost. A secondary goal is, while achieving the first goal, information needs to be supplied, to the original poster. Other list members can/might benefit from this information. In this case, my info was very " skimpy, " intentionally. Why? Read below. -- Has anyone read the original post? Anyone? I have " no one individual " to help. I did see post with a subject field without a " Re: " , and I could consider that the original post, and I do. However, it seemed to be a " reply " , not an original post. So, I assumed the original post was under a different Subject field. I have not read it. As such, I never make a long post, that might be off topic. I keep it very short, until more details come to light. So, if you read the original post, you know far more than me. As the original post was not available to me, as I stated at the top of my post, I kept my reply VERY SHORT. I made just ONE KEY POINT. My one point, was to be sure the walls had to come out. Nothing more. There is no need to do a 3,000 dollar clean up job if the mold in the shower is just your everyday shower stall black dots on the outside of the tiles. So, while you can nitpick on the shortness of my post, the KEY POINT you all agree to. I made no attempt to be " totally correct " in all the details. I was " short " on purpose. Waste of my time, if I am so off target, from not reading the original post. Perhaps it was tested as a deadly mold, or it was coming out from between all the tiles via the grout, and outside of the shower stall, and all the wall interiors do need to be removed. With full suits. -- Regarding the formal name of " Black Mold " , do read up on Chicago, where one street had it, in some 15 homes, where 1 family died, 2 were hospitalized, and homes were bulldozed, and several were fired. This mold is all over the country, but the northern mid west is plagued by it, for the last 25 years, I have read the newspaper and magazine stories. Time magazine even covered the Chicago street. I was not using the word 'formal' to mean " scientific " , but what the newspapers call it. Black Mold. Many mold experts call it the same. Yes, there are thousands of mold " species " that are black in color. I EXPLICITLY use the word " TYPE " so as to not be miscontrued as " species " or " genre " . That you, you, " redefined " the word " TYPE " to mean what you, you wanted it to mean, is not, is not, my mistake. Not my mistake. I could have worded it like this: There are two types of black colored mold species. Some species are deadly, and the other species are easily cleaned. -- Yes, mold can be all sorts of colors. I never said mold was only black. I wonder if you realize you must have misread my words? The spores from this mold will kill, by quantity, filling the lungs, resulting in an immune reaction so toxic, it kills as well. That is why they fired the worse of the homes, instead of bulldozer where the operator is sealed in with super clear air, to prevent his death. -- Really this is old stuff. I'm surprised Carl had not heard of these events. There was a posting a few months back of a home that was fired. If I missed replying to your post, then I have yet to read your post. As I consider this a 'dead' thread, with no original post, I will not clarify my post any further, as it's all said above. If the original poster needs/wants more information, from me, then they will have to repost the original post. I'm not going to spend my time typing to " no one. " My goal is to help individuals, first and foremost. Secondary goal is while doing achieving the first goal, information needs to be supplied, to the original poster. Other list members can/might benefit from this information. I will not just post information, wily nilly. My typing must be " on target " . There was " no target " , so my post was " short. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Thanks Carl. Just wanted to know for the future. It was long time ago, 1990, but my aunt was very sick, so maybe caused a problem with her, who was living here, and due to short term memory problems, couldn't remember to fix it long enough to take care of it. > > Short, general answer. Sewage is very different from mold. The > main concerns are disease causing (pathogenic) bacteria, virus > such as Hepatitus, and blood borne pathogens. I forget the > numbers but the original studies on sewage (Burroughs and > Cole) found on average about 80 pathogens in typical sewage. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 I was gone all day today, so I don't know what all has been posted but orginal post was 71954 > > > I ask the list owners to investigate how this terrible long thread with > no apparent original poster is turning some of the well respected list > members into an uproar, when nothing of the sort is justified. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.