Guest guest Posted December 18, 2009 Report Share Posted December 18, 2009 Joe: This is not the Panacea of diagnostic testing. It was designed and only used for invasive Aspergillosis in patients with cancer and organ transplant. In these subjects there is massive growth. Therefore, it is only valuable as an adjunct to to diagnosis and treatment for the fungal infection. Also, the test is non-specific. 1-3 beta D-glucans are produced my all molds and Candida (yeast). Therefore, it does not identify the specific fungus. People are better off doing the mycotoxin tests performed by Dr. Hooper. Also, one can have a negative glucan test but still be positive for mycotoxins. In addition, I would not recommend this test for individuals who are ill from exposure to damp indoor spaces. There are too many other variables within these environments. I suggest that you and other re-read my papers on this subject. Probable interactions occur in contaminated homes and offices among mold by-products (mycotoxins, antgens), bacterial by-products of gram negative and positive organisms, and endotoxins and VOCS (microbial and nonmicrobial) to mention a few. Finally, the Actinomycetes (Streptomyces and Mycobacterium) are potential human pathogens (Look up Mycobacterium avium complex) by doing a Google search. Enough said. Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D. Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist www.drthrasher.org toxicologist1@... Off: 916-745-4703 Cell: 575-937-1150 L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC Trauma Specialist sandracrawley@... 916-745-4703 - Off 775-309-3994 - Cell This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2009 Report Share Posted December 19, 2009 I would not recommend this test to individuals exposed to damp indoor spaces. Damp indoor spaces contains more than just mold. Also, this test is for immuncompromised individuals who have developed systemic mold infections. The test will not add anything to a diagnosis and may distract from the diagnosis. I know of a least one individual who had negative results when he was tested by this method. He has invovlement of his sinuses and not necessarily a systemic infection. Jack-Dwayne: Thrasher, Ph.D. Toxicologist/Immunotoxicologist/Fetaltoxicologist www.drthrasher.org toxicologist1@... Off: 916-745-4703 Cell: 575-937-1150 L. Crawley, M.ED., LADC Trauma Specialist sandracrawley@... 916-745-4703 - Off 775-309-3994 - Cell This message and any attachments forwarded with it is to be considered privileged and confidential. The forwarding or redistribution of this message (and any attachments) without my prior written consent is strictly prohibited and may violate privacy laws. Once the intended purpose of this message has been served, please destroy the original message contents. If you have received this message in error, please reply immediately to advise the sender of the miscommunication and then delete the message and any copies you have printed. Thank you in advance for your compliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.