Re: Another fighting the system question

[Guest guest]

Sue,

It's been tried for years but those in authority don't agree with our

experience. The hard science in the form they require isn't there

yet and probably never will be. Not because chemical intolerance

isn't real but because it doesn't fit their system.

Just like cancer used to be considered psychosomatic because it

wasn't infectious, the system of belief at that time. Or fevers were

evil possessions before germs were known and understood. In

fact, M.D. has a paper on chemical intolerance as

a possible new disease paradigm. If you go to:

linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1550830706003521 you can

select one of three sources to see it. One costs money, another

has a free registration, and the third has a free trial of their

publication.

You can get her more up-to-date information by Googling her

name plus " QEESI " or " TILT " .

Carl Grimes

Healthy Habitats LLC

-----

Hi All,

Since I am in a feisty mood this a.m., here's another one: has any law

firm or environmental group taken up the MCS cause? I would think it

could be a class action suit in the making, all these people being

sickened by inadequate building standards, unsafe chemicals allowed in

everyday use by our govt....

Sue

----------

The following section of this message contains a file attachment

prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.

If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system,

you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.

If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

---- File information -----------

File: DEFAULT.BMP

Date: 15 Jun 2009, 23:10

Size: 358 bytes.

Type: Unknown

[Guest guest]

The term MSC is a kiss of death and therefore anyone who has it is assured in a

state/fed case of losing under summary judgment.

So when people wnat to go running around screaming I have MCS blah blah, they

get a rude awakening.

The abduction/addiciton paradigm that Carl is referncing from has

been around for a while.

Do pick up the book low levels high stakes that she wrote it will explain

all...better than mold warriors by shoemaker, in my opinion

Re: [] Another " fighting the system " question

Sue,

It's been tried for years but those in authority don't agree with our

experience. The hard science in the form they require isn't there

yet and probably never will be. Not because chemical intolerance

isn't real but because it doesn't fit their system.

Just like cancer used to be considered psychosomatic because it

wasn't infectious, the system of belief at that time. Or fevers were

evil possessions before germs were known and understood. In

fact, M.D. has a paper on chemical intolerance as

a possible new disease paradigm. If you go to:

linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1550830706003521 you can

select one of three sources to see it. One costs money, another

has a free registration, and the third has a free trial of their

publication.

You can get her more up-to-date information by Googling her

name plus " QEESI " or " TILT " .

Carl Grimes

Healthy Habitats LLC

[Guest guest]

thank you for the book recommendation. sue v.

>The term MSC is a kiss of death and therefore anyone who has it is

>assured in a state/fed case of losing under summary judgment.

>

>So when people wnat to go running around screaming I have MCS blah blah,

>they get a rude awakening.

>

>The abduction/addiciton paradigm that Carl is referncing from

> has been around for a while.

>

>Do pick up the book low levels high stakes that she wrote it will

>explain all...better than mold warriors by shoemaker, in my opinion

>

>

>

> Re: [] Another " fighting the system " question

>

>

>Sue,

>

>It's been tried for years but those in authority don't agree with our

>experience. The hard science in the form they require isn't there

>yet and probably never will be. Not because chemical intolerance

>isn't real but because it doesn't fit their system.

>

>Just like cancer used to be considered psychosomatic because it

>wasn't infectious, the system of belief at that time. Or fevers were

>evil possessions before germs were known and understood. In

>fact, M.D. has a paper on chemical intolerance as

>a possible new disease paradigm. If you go to:

>linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1550830706003521 you can

>select one of three sources to see it. One costs money, another

>has a free registration, and the third has a free trial of their

>publication.

>

>You can get her more up-to-date information by Googling her

>name plus " QEESI " or " TILT " .

>

>Carl Grimes

>Healthy Habitats LLC