Guest guest Posted December 31, 2009 Report Share Posted December 31, 2009 well thats pretty interesting, thanks > > Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(6):494-6. > Mucormycosis infection of the lacrimal sac. > Kapur R, Aakalu VK, August CZ, Weiss RA. > Departments > of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago > College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60612, U.S.A. > > Biopsy > of the lacrimal sac for patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal > duct obstruction has been a topic of debate for many years. The authors > present a case of a 72-year-old immunocompetent woman with a 2-month > history of epiphora secondary to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. During > an uneventful dacryorhinocystostomy, a routine lacrimal sac biopsy was > performed and revealed mucormycosis. After appropriate infectious > disease consultation, intensive antifungal therapy was given > uneventfully. The patient has not had any signs of active Mucor > infection after treatment in 6 months of follow up. This case > demonstrates the utility of routine lacrimal sac biopsy and stands as > an example of the potential to miss a serious diagnosis. > > PMID: 19935261 [PubMed - in process] > > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19935261?itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.P\ ubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum & ordinalpos=1 > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.