Re: HPV dangers - when will the Ceverix reports start pouring in? (have they already??)

[Guest guest]

Ceverix NOT yet approved in US so there should be " no "

VAERS reports.

Since Ceverix is approved in some EU countries, adverse

reactions may have been reported but this information

is NOT readily available.

*******************************************

*The information provided in this email *

*and any attachment thereto is just that *

* -- information. *

* *

*It is not medical advice and it does not *

*require any specific action or actions. *

* *

*While the information is thought to be *

*accurate, no representation is made as *

*to the accuracy of the information posted*

*other than it is my best understanding of*

*the facts on the date that this email and*

*any attachments thereto are posted. *

* *

*Everyone should verify the accuracy of *

*the information provided for themselves *

*before acting on it. *

*******************************************

Regards,

Dr. King

http://www.dr-king.com

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

At 12:06 8/15/08 -0400, Jim Witte wrote:

> When will the Ceverix adverse event reports

>start pouring in? Or have they already, I

>don't make a habit of checking VAERS every

>day With Ceverix, you also have that

>relatively new adjuvant which I bet is not

>adequately tested (like everything else

>vaccine-related..)

>

>Jim

>

>------------------------------------

>

>

[Guest guest]

For starters, let's spell the name of the vaccine correctly. You will not find any adverse events associated with "Ceverix" because there is no such vaccine by that name (or not that I know of, which is connected to HPV). Over time, one may find additions to the VAERS database for Cervarix, but how will these be distinguished from the adverse reactions to Gardasil? Right now, Gardasil is listed as HPV4 on the VAERS database. How will Cervarix be identified on VAERS? I don't mean to be a prick, but these small, but important details do make a difference when trying to locate info on the Internet, sadly. " G. King" wrote: Ceverix NOT yet approved in US so there should be "no"VAERS reports. Since Ceverix is approved in some EU countries, adversereactions may have been reported but this information is NOT readily available.********************************************The information provided in this email **and any attachment thereto is just that ** -- information. ** **It is not medical advice and it does not **require any specific action or actions. * * * *While the information is thought to be **accurate, no representation is made as **to the accuracy of the information posted**other than it is my best understanding of**the facts on the date that this email and**any attachments thereto are posted. * * **Everyone should verify the accuracy of **the information provided for

themselves **before acting on it. ********************************************Regards,Dr. Kinghttp://www.dr-king.com++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ At 12:06 8/15/08 -0400, Jim Witte wrote:> When will the Ceverix adverse event reports >start pouring in? Or have they already, I >don't make a habit of checking VAERS every >day With Ceverix, you also have that >relatively new adjuvant which I bet is not >adequately tested (like everything else >vaccine-related..)>>Jim>>------------------------------------>>

[Guest guest]

Aasa,

Sorry for propagating the misspelling of Cervarix.

However, approval for Cervarix in the US will

probabpy not take place before 2009.

Since Cervarix only contains antigens for HPV-16

and HPV-18, VAERS will probably list it as " HPV2 " .

At 21:30 8/15/08 -0400, you wrote:

>

>For starters, let's spell the name of the vaccine

>correctly. You will not find any adverse events

>associated with " Ceverix " because there is no such

>vaccine by that name (or not that I know of, which

>is connected to HPV). Over time, one may find

>additions to the VAERS database for Cervarix, but

>how will these be distinguished from the adverse

>reactions to Gardasil? Right now, Gardasil is

>listed as HPV4 on the VAERS database. How will

>Cervarix be identified on VAERS? I don't mean to

>be a prick, but these small, but important details

>do make a difference when trying to locate info on

>the Internet, sadly.

>

> " G. King " wrote:

>>

>>Ceverix NOT yet approved in US so there should be " no "

>>VAERS reports.

>>

>>Since Ceverix is approved in some EU countries, adverse

>>reactions may have been reported but this information

>>is NOT readily available.

>>

[Guest guest]

, No problem in this regard on my part. It only comes up when I have to dig up info on my kids, and it has to be there in a form where I and their school boards can access the same info easily. I recently sent vaccination exemption forms to our public health department for all three of my youngest kids. I hope that I never hear from them again, but somehow I doubt it. At the same time, I know that the worst part of my paperwork is done! I have filled in the forns and my kids are now exempt from any further vaccines.YAY!!! Aasa " G. King" wrote: Aasa,Sorry for propagating the misspelling of Cervarix.However, approval for Cervarix in the US willprobabpy not take place before 2009.Since Cervarix only contains antigens for HPV-16 and HPV-18, VAERS will probably list it as "HPV2".At 21:30 8/15/08 -0400, you wrote:>>For starters, let's spell the name of the vaccine >correctly. You will not find any adverse events >associated with "Ceverix" because there is no such >vaccine by that name (or not that I know of, which >is connected to HPV). Over time, one may find >additions to the VAERS database for Cervarix, but >how will these be distinguished from the adverse >reactions to Gardasil? Right now, Gardasil is >listed as HPV4 on the VAERS database. How will >Cervarix be

identified on VAERS? I don't mean to >be a prick, but these small, but important details>do make a difference when trying to locate info on >the Internet, sadly. >>" G. King" wrote: >> >>Ceverix NOT yet approved in US so there should be "no">>VAERS reports. >>>>Since Ceverix is approved in some EU countries, adverse>>reactions may have been reported but this information >>is NOT readily available.>>

[Guest guest]

Sorry, I filled in the forms, not the forns. What the hell was I thinking? AasaAasa wrote: , No problem in this regard on my part. It only comes up when I have to dig up info on my kids, and it has to be there in a form where I and their school boards can access the same info easily. I recently sent vaccination exemption forms to our public health department for all three of my youngest kids. I hope that I

never hear from them again, but somehow I doubt it. At the same time, I know that the worst part of my paperwork is done! I have filled in the forns and my kids are now exempt from any further vaccines.YAY!!! Aasa " G. King" wrote: Aasa,Sorry for propagating the misspelling of Cervarix.However, approval for Cervarix in the US willprobabpy not take place before 2009.Since Cervarix only contains antigens for HPV-16 and HPV-18, VAERS will probably list it as "HPV2".At 21:30 8/15/08 -0400, you wrote:>>For starters, let's spell the name of the vaccine >correctly. You will not find any adverse events >associated with "Ceverix" because there is no such >vaccine by that name (or not that I know of, which

>is connected to HPV). Over time, one may find >additions to the VAERS database for Cervarix, but >how will these be distinguished from the adverse >reactions to Gardasil? Right now, Gardasil is >listed as HPV4 on the VAERS database. How will >Cervarix be identified on VAERS? I don't mean to >be a prick, but these small, but important details>do make a difference when trying to locate info on >the Internet, sadly. >>" G. King" wrote: >> >>Ceverix NOT yet approved in US so there should be "no">>VAERS reports. >>>>Since Ceverix is approved in some EU countries, adverse>>reactions may have been reported but this information >>is NOT readily available.>>