MD's Opinion of Obama Healthcare

[Guest guest]

MD's  Opinion

of Obama Health

Care.............

I am

sending this to all of my friends and family although I know

some of us do not share political views.  My intent is not

to offend, nor take advantage of our friendship.  I believe

this piece of legislation should transcend party

lines.  This isn't about one party winning over

another.  If you haven't read this piece of legislation,

you should.  Afterwards, if you do not support it,

please contact your Congressional representatives and let them

know!   Voters need to understand what these

1000+ pages truly mean and the consequences to the American

people.

THE ONE WORD TO DESCRIBE OBAMA

CARE

Dr. Dave Janda

To The

Point

Thursday, 23 July 2009

As a physician

who has authored books on preventative health

care, I was given the opportunity to be

the keynote speaker at a Congressional Dinner at The

Capitol Building in Washington last Friday

(7/17).

The presentation was entitled Health Care

Reform, The Power & Profit of

Prevention, and I was gratified that it was well

received.

In preparation for the presentation, I

read the latest version of " reform " as authored by The

Obama Administration and supported by Speaker

Pelosi and Senator

Reid.  Here is the link to the 1,018

page document:

http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/111/pdf/publications/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pd\

f

Let

me summarize just a few salient points of the above

plan.  First, however, it should be clear that the

same warning notice must be placed on The ObamaCare Plan

as on a pack of cigarettes:  Consuming this product

will be hazardous to your health.

The underlying

method of cutting costs throughout the plan is based on

rationing and denying care.  There is no focus on

preventing health care need whatever. The plan's method

is the most inhumane and unethical approach to cutting

costs I can imagine as a physician.

The rationing

of care is implemented through The

National Health Care Board,

according to the plan.  This illustrious Board

" will approve or reject treatment for patients based on

the cost per treatment divided by the number of years

the patient will benefit from the

treatment. "

Translation.....if you are over 65 or

have been recently diagnosed as having an advanced form

of cardiac disease or aggressive cancer.....dream on if

you think you will get treated.....pick out your

coffin.

Oh, you say this could never happen?

Sorry.... this is the same model they use in

Britain.

The plan mandates that there will be

little or no advanced treatments to be available in the

future.  It creates The Federal Coordinating

Council For Comparative Effectiveness Research, the

purpose of which is " to slow the development of new

medications and technologies in order to reduce

costs. "   Yes, this is to be the law.

The

plan also outlines that doctors and hospitals will be

overseen and reviewed by The National Coordinator For

Health Information and Technology.

This "

coordinator " will " monitor treatments being delivered to

make sure doctors and hospitals are strictly following

government guidelines that are deemed appropriate. " It

goes on to say..... " Doctors and hospitals not adhering

to guidelines will face penalties. "

According to

those in Congress, penalties could include large six

figure financial fines and possible

imprisonment.

So according to The ObamaCare

Plan....if your doctor saves your life you might have to

go to the prison to see your doctor for follow -up

appointments.  I believe this is the same model

Stalin used in the former Soviet Union.

Section

102 has the Orwellian title, " Protecting the Choice to

Keep Current Coverage. "   What this section really

mandates is that it is illegal to keep your private

insurance if your status changes - e.g., if you lose or

change your job, retire from your job and become a

senior, graduate from college and get your first

job.  Yes, illegal.

When Mr. Obama hosted a

conference call with bloggers urging them to pressure

Congress to pass his health plan as soon as possible, a

blogger from Maine referenced an

Investors Business Daily article that claimed Section

102 of the House health

legislation would outlaw

private insurance.

He asked: " Is this true?

Will people be able to keep their insurance and will

insurers be able to write new policies even though H.R.

3200 is passed? "   Mr. Obama replied: " You know, I

have to say that I am not familiar with the provision

you are talking about. "

Then there is Section

1233 of The ObamaCare Plan, devoted to  " Advanced

Care Planning. " After each American turns 65 years of

age they have to go to a mandated counseling program

that is designed to end life sooner.

This session

is to occur every 5 years unless the person has

developed a chronic illness then it must be done every

year. The topics in this session will include, " how to

decline hydration, nutrition and how to initiate hospice

care. "   It is no wonder The Obama

Administration does not like my emphasis on

Prevention.  For Mr. Obama, prevention is the

" enemy " as people would live longer.

I rest my

case. The ObamaCare Plan is hazardous to the health of

every American.

After I finished my Capitol Hill

presentation, I was asked by a Congressman in the

question-answer session:  " I'll be doing a number

of network interviews on the ObamaHealth

Care Plan.  If I am asked what is the

one word to describe the plan what should I

answer. "

The answer is simple, honest, direct,

analytical, sad but truthful.  I told him that one

word is FASCIST.

Then I added, " I hope you'll

have the courage to use that word, Congressman.  No

other word is more

appropriate. "

Dr. Dave Janda, MD, is an orthopedic

surgeon, and a world-recognized expert on

the prevention of sports injuries,

particularly in children.  His website

is noinjury.com<http://noinjury.com/>

.

 

 

=

[Guest guest]

Please stop posting these 'summaries' from unknown source. First of all, people

can be assured, all of us being busy, we would rather read a 'summary' of a

1,000 page document. If you are going to read a summary, check out the source.

Do any of us known Dr Darby and who his business connections might be? Do we

know this is indeed from the " Dr Darby " . Also, what is the fear of having an

additional health care plan to choice from. It is FACT that private health

insurance plans will be as they are now. If you are suspicious of a government

run plan, you can simply stay with your private plan. I may stay with mine. I

think I have good health insurance. It doesn't cover mold illness but I doubt a

government plan would either. Secondly, we ALREADY have a government plan that

has been working for seniors since President Roosevelt set it up, so the

government is already in the health care business, which has has none of these

scary features. Medicare and Medicaid are also OPTIONAL plans. You don't need

to get rid of your private insurance when you retire. You can opt out of

Medicare and stick to your private insurance when you retire. Your costs will

be much higher because with two insurers, what your primary insurance doesn't

pay for, your secondary insurer does, but if you decide you want to keep your

private insurance when you hit the age you are eligible for Medicare, you can.

So there is a government run program already that isn't scary, so what is scary

about having another government run plan that includes people below retirement

age? You don't have to take it yourself.

Every election cycle the number one complaint from the public is the cost of

health insurance and for many people, their inability to get it at all. Every

time the government tries to take this on, insurance companies comes out with

all this propaganda against it and everyone becomes afraid, then Congress votes

it down due to pressure from their constituents. During Clinton administration,

it was the " Harry and Louise " ads. So what is the solution? If government

would try to ** " regulate " ** private health insurance companies, FORCE them to

take people with pre-existing conditions, OR if they would try to FORCE them to

lower premiums, then these same people come out on radio and other outlets to

bash government for *the ultimate sin, **REGULATING PRIVATE INDUSTRY**,

" **interfering with capitalism** " and 'free enterprise' " and again an uproar and

Congress votes it down, and THIS VERY THING- the deregulation of *free

enterprise* is what lead to the crisis in the banking industry that we are all

suffering from. Banks kept lobbying Congress to deregulate, deregulate and

deregulate, until all the regulations set up to protect us from last stock

market crash and Great Depression, were gone, now we have another one. They cut

out all regulations that protected the public from abuse from private

enterprise, lifted limits on interest they could charge, and got more limits put

on an individuals ability to file for bankruptys, while getting legislation

passed which made it easier for them to file for bankrupcy. The fear over our

government has become histerical, while we willingly hand over to for-profit

industry our most critical issues.

A strictly 'for profit' business for making tables and chairs probably works out

great. The table isn't so great, and it's gone, but to assume a for-profit

industry makes for the ultimate health care system makes no sense.

So people who believe this (that government is going to NOT take care of elderly

and chronically ill), are saying they believe that a " for profit " industry, is

going to be more willing to take on high cost chronically ill patients and the

elderly, than the government, who has been the main party doing this so far

(Medicaid and Medicare). If you think this, you are NUTS!!!

--- In , SD <darby700@.

Link to health care plan:

>

http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/111/pdf/publications/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pd\

f

Supposedly from Dr Darby:>

> Let me summarize just a few salient points of the above plan. 

[Guest guest]

Well said. Not to mention that pharmaceutical lobbyists have spent $40

million dollars fighting the health care reform. That should tell you

something right there.

Barth

www.presenting.net/sbs/sbs.html

SUBMIT YOUR DOCTOR: www.presenting.net/sbs/molddoctors.html

---

b> Please stop posting these 'summaries' from unknown source. First of all,

people can be assured, all of us being busy, we would rather read a 'summary' of

a 1,000 page document. If you are going

b> to read a summary, check out the source. Do any of us known Dr Darby and who

his business connections might be? Do we know this is indeed from the " Dr

Darby " . Also, what is the fear of having an

b> additional health care plan to choice from. It is FACT that private health

insurance plans will be as they are now. If you are suspicious of a government

run plan, you can simply stay with your

b> private plan. I may stay with mine. I think I have good health insurance.

It doesn't cover mold illness but I doubt a government plan would either.

Secondly, we ALREADY have a government plan

b> that has been working for seniors since President Roosevelt set it up, so the

government is already in the health care business, which has has none of these

scary features. Medicare and Medicaid

b> are also OPTIONAL plans. You don't need to get rid of your private insurance

when you retire. You can opt out of Medicare and stick to your private

insurance when you retire. Your costs will be

b> much higher because with two insurers, what your primary insurance doesn't

pay for, your secondary insurer does, but if you decide you want to keep your

private insurance when you hit the age you

b> are eligible for Medicare, you can. So there is a government run program

already that isn't scary, so what is scary about having another government run

plan that includes people below retirement

b> age? You don't have to take it yourself.

b> Every election cycle the number one complaint from the public is the cost of

health insurance and for many people, their inability to get it at all. Every

time the government tries to take this

b> on, insurance companies comes out with all this propaganda against it and

everyone becomes afraid, then Congress votes it down due to pressure from their

constituents. During Clinton

b> administration, it was the " Harry and Louise " ads. So what is the solution?

If government would try to ** " regulate " ** private health insurance companies,

FORCE them to take people with

b> pre-existing conditions, OR if they would try to FORCE them to lower

premiums, then these same people come out on radio and other outlets to bash

government for *the ultimate sin, **REGULATING

b> PRIVATE INDUSTRY**, " **interfering with capitalism** " and 'free enterprise' "

and again an uproar and Congress votes it down, and THIS VERY THING- the

deregulation of *free enterprise* is what lead

b> to the crisis in the banking industry that we are all suffering from. Banks

kept lobbying Congress to deregulate, deregulate and deregulate, until all the

regulations set up to protect us from

b> last stock market crash and Great Depression, were gone, now we have another

one. They cut out all regulations that protected the public from abuse from

private enterprise, lifted limits on

b> interest they could charge, and got more limits put on an individuals ability

to file for bankruptys, while getting legislation passed which made it easier

for them to file for bankrupcy. The

b> fear over our government has become histerical, while we willingly hand over

to for-profit industry our most critical issues.

b> A strictly 'for profit' business for making tables and chairs probably works

out great. The table isn't so great, and it's gone, but to assume a for-profit

industry makes for the ultimate health

b> care system makes no sense.

b> So people who believe this (that government is going to NOT take care of

elderly and chronically ill), are saying they believe that a " for profit "

industry, is going to be more willing to take on

b> high cost chronically ill patients and the elderly, than the government, who

has been the main party doing this so far (Medicaid and Medicare). If you think

this, you are NUTS!!!

b> --- In , SD <darby700@.

b> Link to health care plan:

>>

http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/111/pdf/publications/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pd\

f

b> Supposedly from Dr Darby:>

>> Let me summarize just a few salient points of the above plan.