Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 Spreading rumor. . .I looked on the AOA blog where this allegation was made. There is nothing there of any substance that would make the allegation worthy of repeating, IMO. Internet road kill. Lenny > > I saw on the AOA blog that a few commenters wrote about Obama saying at > some fund-raiser that he didn't think vaccines should be a choice. Are > there any direct witnesses to this, links or substantiations? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 Well that's interesting because the author of the article on AoA, Claudine Liss, says in the first sentence that she was the one who personally asked Obama the question and was standing there for the answer... > > > > I saw on the AOA blog that a few commenters wrote about Obama saying at > > some fund-raiser that he didn't think vaccines should be a choice. Are > > there any direct witnesses to this, links or substantiations? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 Sad, really sad. Hope there's a huge press backlash to his statement that shakes things up. I can dream. > > Well that's interesting because the author of the article on AoA, > Claudine Liss, says in the first sentence that she was the one who > personally asked Obama the question and was standing there for the > answer... > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 Selective vaccination is not the opposite of forced vaccination. It forces parents to choose medical care (vaccines are essentially drugs) without complete information. The alternative to forced vaccination isn't selective vaccination - it's safe vaccination, it's vaccination with truth, it's vaccination with complete information. Where else in medicine is it okay to deliberately hide information for the " greater good? " > > > > Well that's interesting because the author of the article on AoA, > > Claudine Liss, says in the first sentence that she was the one who > > personally asked Obama the question and was standing there for the > > answer... > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 I found this statement from Obama during primaries from A-Champ posted on the AOA site. So I think we don't have all the facts just yet as Lenny points out: Would you support a federal right for families and individuals to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use? I support screening for a wide variety of diseases and disorders. Early diagnosis and early intervention are the best practice for most illnesses. I believe that every American has the right to access these screenings, and I believe that every American has the right also to refuse these screenings voluntarily if they so choose. I also support a thorough and independent review of our nation's vaccination policies. Sharon > > > > I saw on the AOA blog that a few commenters wrote about Obama saying at > > some fund-raiser that he didn't think vaccines should be a choice. Are > > there any direct witnesses to this, links or substantiations? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 The human body has a built-in power of immunity. I demand the right to rely on that natural built-in power, rather than any concoctions being pushed down our throats or into our veins by the so called "medical authorities", drug manufacturers, drug salesmen or anyone else who is out to make a buck. Bob Catalano www.medicine-no.com Re: OT: What's this about Obama saying he doesn't support vax choice? Selective vaccination is not the opposite of forced vaccination. It forces parents to choose medical care (vaccines are essentially drugs) without complete information. The alternative to forced vaccination isn't selective vaccination - it's safe vaccination, it's vaccination with truth, it's vaccination with complete information. Where else in medicine is it okay to deliberately hide information for the "greater good?" > >> > Well that's interesting because the author of the article on AoA,> > Claudine Liss, says in the first sentence that she was the one who> > personally asked Obama the question and was standing there for the> > answer...> > > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 You can read and download the responses of Obama and Biden to the A-CHAMP questionnaire at our new web site;http://autismactionnetwork.orgOn Sep 8, 2008, at 12:29 PM, showell48 wrote:I found this statement from Obama during primaries from A-Champ posted on the AOA site. So I think we don't have all the facts just yet as Lenny points out:Would you support a federal right for families and individuals to choose for themselves which vaccines they will use?I support screening for a wide variety of diseases and disorders. Early diagnosis and early intervention are the best practice for most illnesses. I believe that every American has the right to access these screenings, and I believe that every American has the right also to refuse these screenings voluntarily if they so choose. I also support a thoroughand independent review of our nation's vaccination policies.Sharon> >> > I saw on the AOA blog that a few commenters wrote about Obama saying at > > some fund-raiser that he didn't think vaccines should be a choice. Are > > there any direct witnesses to this, links or substantiations?> >> J. KrakowLaw Office of J. Krakow, P.C.1205 lin Avenue, Suite 110Garden City, New York 11530 (NYC) (fax) (Mobile)rkrakow@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 Some Obama links of interest: Side effects could be genetic http://www.commercialappeal.com/mca/local/article/0,2845,MCA_25340_5583098,00.ht\ ml Genomics and Personalized Medicine Act. This bill, introduced by Sen. Barack Obama, would establish an interagency working group to foster research and the translation of that research into personalize medicine. It would authorize $150 million for pharmacogenomics research and translation of results into the clinical setting. It also would provide a 100 percent tax credit for the development of these tests—in effort to drive development quickly. The bill has workforce provisions to train people in genetics and genomics. It also has provisions related to the regulation of genomics and genetic tests. http://www.nixonpeabody.com/publications_detail3.asp?ID=1461 Pandemic Flu Vaccination Program http://obama.senate.gov/news/050606-grounding_a_pandemic/index.php S. 1082 - On May 9, 2007, the Senate passed S. 1082, the Food and Drug Administration Revitalization Act. The bill is focused primarily on FDA and contains sections regarding user fees and drug safety monitoring procedures. As amended, the bill also contains several provisions of interest to NIH. First, the bill would expand the Clinicaltrials.gov registry to include mandatory reporting of certain drug and device clinical trials. The bill would also require that the ClinicalTrials.gov website provide corresponding linkages to peer-reviewed literature and certain publicly available FDA information regarding the results of those trials. Second, S. 1082 includes provisions to reauthorize the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act. Third, the bill contains provisions to expand research on pediatric devices. Finally, an amendment offered by Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) was added during floor debate, requiring the Secretary to contract with the Institute of Medicine to make recommendations regarding oversight and regulation of genetic tests. S. 1082 was introduced on April 10, by Senator Kennedy (D-MA). See H.R. 2900. http://www.drugabuse.gov/DirReports/DirRep907/DirectorReport14.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 Yes, Obama does not answer the direct question, but does the weasle dance. His response is about screening, but the question is not. However, his anti-choice quote comes from only one source, Claudine Liss, and the question she asked is not reproduced so that we can see exactly what he is answering to. Before I would make any judgment, for or against Obama on this, I would like to see corroborating evidence of this position. My hunch is that Obama will strive to seek some middle ground between vaccine promoters and vaccine skeptics. It is better politics to be pro autism, than it is to be anti-vaccine. I suspect trying to force either candidate into an anti-vaccine corner will produce unsatisfying results. Let us not forget that there are far more people worried about autism, at the moment, than there are people worried about vaccines; like it or not. Lenny > > > > > > I saw on the AOA blog that a few commenters wrote about Obama > saying at > > > some fund-raiser that he didn't think vaccines should be a choice. > Are > > > there any direct witnesses to this, links or substantiations? > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2008 Report Share Posted September 8, 2008 Well stated. Better even than being "pro autism" I am "pro child", specifically my own son (who has the label "autism" among other diagnoses) and those who are similarly situated.Yes, Obama does not answer the direct question, but does the weasledance. His response is about screening, but the question is not.However, his anti-choice quote comes from only one source, ClaudineLiss, and the question she asked is not reproduced so that we can seeexactly what he is answering to. Before I would make any judgment,for or against Obama on this, I would like to see corroboratingevidence of this position.My hunch is that Obama will strive to seek some middle ground betweenvaccine promoters and vaccine skeptics. It is better politics to be pro autism, than it is to be anti-vaccine.I suspect trying to force either candidate into an anti-vaccine cornerwill produce unsatisfying results. Let us not forget that there arefar more people worried about autism, at the moment, than there arepeople worried about vaccines; like it or not.Lenny> > >> > > I saw on the AOA blog that a few commenters wrote about Obama > saying at > > > some fund-raiser that he didn't think vaccines should be a choice. > Are > > > there any direct witnesses to this, links or substantiations?> > >> >> J. KrakowLaw Office of J. Krakow, P.C.1205 lin Avenue, Suite 110Garden City, New York 11530 (NYC) (fax) (Mobile)rkrakow@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2008 Report Share Posted September 10, 2008 Until we have safe vaccinations, we should at the very least have a choice! Asking a politician to support safe vaccinations is letting him/her off too easy. Who wouldn't support safe vaccines? jmo, Lin > > >> > > Well that's interesting because the author of the article on AoA,> > > Claudine Liss, says in the first sentence that she was the one who> > > personally asked Obama the question and was standing there for the> > > answer...> > > > > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.