Guest guest Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 (Oral presentation at Antwerp Consortium July 2009) Proximal compensation for distal weakness: comparison of subjects with Charcot Marie Tooth Disease and healthy subjects with exercise induced weakness. G. Ramdharry1, B.Da~,M. Reilly3 and J. Marsden4 ISchool of Physiotherapy, St 's University of London and Kingston University, London, UK; 'Sobell department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, University College London, London, UK; 3MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Department of Molecular Pathogenesis, University College London, London, UK; ·School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK To maintain walking ability people with CMT may employ proximal strategies to compensate for distal weakness. This is a presentation of two separate studies of proximal compensatory strategies, the first in people with CMT and the second in healthy subjects who have been weakened with fatiguing exercise Study I: Methods· We recruited 14 people CMT and 12 healthy subjects matched for height, weight, age and gender Hip and ankle strength and sensation measures were recorded Gait was characterised using a 3D motion analysis system (CODAmotion) combined with force plates recordings (Kistler) Moments and power during walking were calculated using inverse dynamics with additional markers to record trunk kinematics. Kinematic and kinetic data were compared using an ANCOVA with gait speed as a covariant. Results .. PwCMT were weaker distally than controls with greater sensory impairment The ankle plantaflexor moment and power generation at push off was lower in pwCMT (moment p=O..01; power p=O.OOI) An increase in hip flexor range and was observed that was related to peak dorsiflexion angle (p=O 009; r=-0..6, p=004) and increases in knee power generation were observed in pwCMT (p=O.Ol). PF strength was associated with an increase in the range of trunk rotation (p=004; r= 0.62, p=O.Q2). Study 2: Methods .. Ten healthy control subjects were recruited. They performed a repeated heel raise exercise to fatigue the plantaflexor muscles and stength was monitored with fixed myometry. Gait was characterised using the same methods as study 1 and gait speed was constrained to pre fatigue values Kinematic and kinetic data were compaired using paired T-tests. Results .. Plantarflexor strength reduced by 25% Gait analysis revealed an increase in hip and knee kinetics in early stance (knee extensor moment: p=O.03; knee power generation: p=0.03; hip power generation p=OOOI) and increased hip power generation (p=003) at pre-swing. Conclusion of studies: It is hypothesised that people with CMT appeaI to use trunk motion and changes in knee kinetics at pre-swing to compensate for plantarflexor weakness whereas healthy subjects appeaI to use hip and knee extension in earlyy stance. Differences in these strategies may be due to variation in the time taken to develop compensatory strategies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.