Guest guest Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 In case you thought politics plays no role in research. The government will not touch any research that may threaten the promotion of vaccines. - Lenny US Researchers Call Off Controversial Autism Study By Carla k. . http://tinyurl.com/54hd37 Chicago (AP) — A government agency has dropped plans for a study of a controversial treatment for autism that critics had called an unethical experiment on children. The National Institute of Mental Health said in a statement Wednesday that the study of the treatment — called chelation — has been abandoned. The agency decided the money would be better used testing other potential therapies for autism and related disorders, the statement said. " There will be parents who are disappointed, " said Nakamura, the scientific director of NIMH. " We recognize that for children there is a fine line for the risk-benefit ratio. You have to be pretty certain of the overall safety of the procedure. " The agency wasn't confident enough in the procedure's safety, Nakamura said. The study had been on hold because of safety concerns after another study published last year linked a drug used in the treatment to lasting brain problems in rats. Chelation (kee-LAY'-shun) removes heavy metals from the body and is used to treat lead poisoning. Its use as an autism treatment is based on the fringe theory that mercury in vaccines triggers autism — a theory never proved and rejected by mainstream science. Mercury hasn't been in childhood vaccines since 2001, except for certain flu shots. But many parents of autistic children are believers in the treatment, and NIMH agreed to test it. The researchers had proposed recruiting 120 autistic children ages 4 to 10 and giving half a chelation drug and the other half a dummy pill. The 12-week test would measure before-and-after blood mercury levels and autism symptoms. The study outline said that failing to find a difference between the two groups would counteract " anecdotal reports and widespread belief " that chelation works. Autism is a spectrum of disorders that hamper a person's ability to communicate and interact with others. Most doctors believe there is no cure. In canceling the study, the agency noted it would take another year to review the study and three years to do it. In the meantime, the agency said, it was likely that other research would " provide deeper understanding of the causes of autism and more refined avenues for developing treatments. " Several scientists praised the decision, including the lead author of the rat study, which found lingering problems in animals that did not have elevated lead levels. " I think they're making the right decision not to go forward with the study, " said Barbara Strupp, a professor of psychology and nutritional sciences at Cornell University. " Our data raise concerns about administering (the chelation compound) to children who do not have elevated levels of heavy metals, " Strupp said. Dr. Offit, chief of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, agreed with the decision to cancel. " Suppose that a child suffers a severe side effect from chelation, " said Offit, author of " Autism's False Prophets, " a new book on autism research. " Without any evidence it's helpful, I think it's unethical. " The chelation drug proposed for the study, DMSA, can cause side effects including rashes and low white blood cell count. " This was a wise and careful decision, " said Ellen Silbergeld of s Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health, who had been invited to comment on the study during an earlier review, in an e-mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 I understand why they stopped it completely(threatening their vaccine policy) but i think the study, had it been done, would have been doomed to failure. There are too many other variables relating to each individual child in a short study like this and measuring only mercury blood levels hardly seems sufficient. M Subject: US Researchers Call Off Controversial Autism StudyTo: EOHarm Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 8:30 PM In case you thought politics plays no role in research. Thegovernment will not touch any research that may threaten the promotionof vaccines. - LennyUS Researchers Call Off Controversial Autism Study By Carla k. . http://tinyurl. com/54hd37 Chicago (AP) — A government agency has dropped plans for a studyof a controversial treatment for autism that critics had called anunethical experiment on children.The National Institute of Mental Health said in a statementWednesday that the study of the treatment — called chelation — hasbeen abandoned. The agency decided the money would be better usedtesting other potential therapies for autism and related disorders,the statement said."There will be parents who are disappointed, " said Nakamura, the scientific director of NIMH. "We recognize that forchildren there is a fine line for the risk-benefit ratio. You have tobe pretty certain of the overall safety of the procedure."The agency wasn't confident enough in the procedure's safety,Nakamura said.The study had been on hold because of safety concerns afteranother study published last year linked a drug used in the treatmentto lasting brain problems in rats.Chelation (kee-LAY'-shun) removes heavy metals from the body andis used to treat lead poisoning. Its use as an autism treatment isbased on the fringe theory that mercury in vaccines triggers autism —a theory never proved and rejected by mainstream science. Mercuryhasn't been in childhood vaccines since 2001, except for certain flushots.But many parents of autistic children are believers in thetreatment, and NIMH agreed to test it.The researchers had proposed recruiting 120 autistic childrenages 4 to 10 and giving half a chelation drug and the other half adummy pill. The 12-week test would measure before-and-after bloodmercury levels and autism symptoms.The study outline said that failing to find a difference betweenthe two groups would counteract "anecdotal reports and widespreadbelief" that chelation works.Autism is a spectrum of disorders that hamper a person's abilityto communicate and interact with others. Most doctors believe there isno cure.In canceling the study, the agency noted it would take anotheryear to review the study and three years to do it. In the meantime,the agency said, it was likely that other research would "providedeeper understanding of the causes of autism and more refined avenuesfor developing treatments."Several scientists praised the decision, including the leadauthor of the rat study, which found lingering problems in animalsthat did not have elevated lead levels."I think they're making the right decision not to go forwardwith the study," said Barbara Strupp, a professor of psychology andnutritional sciences at Cornell University."Our data raise concerns about administering (the chelationcompound) to children who do not have elevated levels of heavymetals," Strupp said.Dr. Offit, chief of infectious diseases at the Children'sHospital of Philadelphia, agreed with the decision to cancel."Suppose that a child suffers a severe side effect fromchelation," said Offit, author of "Autism's False Prophets," a newbook on autism research. "Without any evidence it's helpful, I thinkit's unethical."The chelation drug proposed for the study, DMSA, can cause sideeffects including rashes and low white blood cell count."This was a wise and careful decision," said Ellen Silbergeld ofs Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health, who hadbeen invited to comment on the study during an earlier review, in ane-mail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 " The study had been on hold because of safety concerns after another study published last year linked a drug used in the treatment to lasting brain problems in rats. " Some of the rats are not even at grade level for reading comprehension.... C'mon, who wanted an NIH or Autism Speaks-funded chelation study? Such a study would have to be done independently, and, sadly, in another country. > > In case you thought politics plays no role in research. The > government will not touch any research that may threaten the promotion > of vaccines. - Lenny > > > US Researchers Call Off Controversial Autism Study > > By Carla k. . http://tinyurl.com/54hd37 > > Chicago (AP) — A government agency has dropped plans for a study > of a controversial treatment for autism that critics had called an > unethical experiment on children. > The National Institute of Mental Health said in a statement > Wednesday that the study of the treatment — called chelation — has > been abandoned. The agency decided the money would be better used > testing other potential therapies for autism and related disorders, > the statement said. > " There will be parents who are disappointed, " said > Nakamura, the scientific director of NIMH. " We recognize that for > children there is a fine line for the risk-benefit ratio. You have to > be pretty certain of the overall safety of the procedure. " > The agency wasn't confident enough in the procedure's safety, > Nakamura said. > The study had been on hold because of safety concerns after > another study published last year linked a drug used in the treatment > to lasting brain problems in rats. > Chelation (kee-LAY'-shun) removes heavy metals from the body and > is used to treat lead poisoning. Its use as an autism treatment is > based on the fringe theory that mercury in vaccines triggers autism — > a theory never proved and rejected by mainstream science. Mercury > hasn't been in childhood vaccines since 2001, except for certain flu > shots. > But many parents of autistic children are believers in the > treatment, and NIMH agreed to test it. > The researchers had proposed recruiting 120 autistic children > ages 4 to 10 and giving half a chelation drug and the other half a > dummy pill. The 12-week test would measure before-and-after blood > mercury levels and autism symptoms. > The study outline said that failing to find a difference between > the two groups would counteract " anecdotal reports and widespread > belief " that chelation works. > Autism is a spectrum of disorders that hamper a person's ability > to communicate and interact with others. Most doctors believe there is > no cure. > In canceling the study, the agency noted it would take another > year to review the study and three years to do it. In the meantime, > the agency said, it was likely that other research would " provide > deeper understanding of the causes of autism and more refined avenues > for developing treatments. " > Several scientists praised the decision, including the lead > author of the rat study, which found lingering problems in animals > that did not have elevated lead levels. > " I think they're making the right decision not to go forward > with the study, " said Barbara Strupp, a professor of psychology and > nutritional sciences at Cornell University. > " Our data raise concerns about administering (the chelation > compound) to children who do not have elevated levels of heavy > metals, " Strupp said. > Dr. Offit, chief of infectious diseases at the Children's > Hospital of Philadelphia, agreed with the decision to cancel. > " Suppose that a child suffers a severe side effect from > chelation, " said Offit, author of " Autism's False Prophets, " a new > book on autism research. " Without any evidence it's helpful, I think > it's unethical. " > The chelation drug proposed for the study, DMSA, can cause side > effects including rashes and low white blood cell count. > " This was a wise and careful decision, " said Ellen Silbergeld of > s Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health, who had > been invited to comment on the study during an earlier review, in an > e-mail. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 > C'mon, who wanted an NIH or Autism Speaks-funded chelation study? > Such a study would have to be done independently, and, sadly, in > another country. I agree . But this study still needs to happen, and soon. I don't know why some agency hasn't done this already. I wish they'd get the lead out. Lenny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 18, 2008 Report Share Posted September 18, 2008 It would take me just a few minutes to find hundreds of child studies on Risperdal, etc. Clearly the concern is not safety. This makes me sick. Dr. Deth and DK mentioned that, for the rat study, there was no mineral replacement performed along with chelation, so it's not a surprise that there were adverse outcomes for the " non-metal-toxic " rats. > > In case you thought politics plays no role in research. The > government will not touch any research that may threaten the promotion > of vaccines. - Lenny > > > US Researchers Call Off Controversial Autism Study > > By Carla k. . http://tinyurl.com/54hd37 > > Chicago (AP) — A government agency has dropped plans for a study > of a controversial treatment for autism that critics had called an > unethical experiment on children. > The National Institute of Mental Health said in a statement > Wednesday that the study of the treatment — called chelation — has > been abandoned. The agency decided the money would be better used > testing other potential therapies for autism and related disorders, > the statement said. > " There will be parents who are disappointed, " said > Nakamura, the scientific director of NIMH. " We recognize that for > children there is a fine line for the risk-benefit ratio. You have to > be pretty certain of the overall safety of the procedure. " > The agency wasn't confident enough in the procedure's safety, > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.