You need to read this on the history of chelation and the history of a subset that could not dump heavy metals at one in five hundred 1999 autism figures

[Guest guest]

Tom I am fixing to tear apart you little world that there is no scientific studies linking Thimerosal to autism just think of mitochondria dysfunctiondisorder google it and find that the very cause is toxins such as in vaccines “Vaccinations contain at least four neuro-toxins: mercury, formaldehyde, MSG and aluminum hydroxide. Researchers at the University of British Columbia have been looking at the possible effects of the fourth item in this list. They injected mice with anthrax vaccine containing aluminum hydroxide. After 20 weeks studying the mice, the team found statistically significant increases in anxiety (38 percent); memory deficits (41 times more errors than the sample group); and allergic skin reaction (20 percent). On autopsy, brain tissue samples showed that 35 percent of the cells were in the process of destroying themselves. According

to Shaw, lead researcher for the project, his research shows a link between aluminum hydroxide and symptoms of Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and Lou Gehrig’s disease. “No one in my lab wants to get vaccinated,” he said. “This totally creeped us out. We weren’t out there to poke holes in vaccines. But all of a sudden, oh my God–we’ve got neuron death!” (www.straight.com/content/cfm?id=16717).According to Shaw; lead researcher, his research shows a link between aluminum hydroxide and symptoms of Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and Lou Gehrig’s disease. “No one in my lab wants to get vaccinated. Just a thought, we could learn from this statement. From scientist’s that know, and not just those spouting CDC propaganda as most are. Who try to defend putting toxic chemicals in our children’s vaccines. Thimerosal turns intoethyl mercury then it enters the brain of the child and it metabolizes into inorganic mercury and

research has shown that the most damaging to the mitochondria that depletes the glutathione is inorganic mercury monosodium glutamate (MSG, added to many Asian foods) I will bet MSG in children’s vaccines is far worse than indicated MSG may also exacerbate a mitochondrial disorder. So Tom it seems that we may have stumbled upon what autism really is and maybe the much worshipped FLU vaccine is causing the symptoms of Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and Lou Gehrig’s disease. And I would be willing to bet that’s where chronic fatigue syndrome is coming from for you see we have always had a subset group that cannot dump heavy metals just do a google on Pinks disease it was one in five hundred children that contracted the disease Pinks which turned out to be mercury poisoning through teething powdersthe next statements are from history and you could exchange the word pinks for autism and you would have today’s headlines but these are from

historypink was affecting one in five hundred children. It seems we had as the CDC puts it, a subset group that was vulnerable even back then. It seems we are repeating history. But unlike those children who got better and recovered,after the doctor.s reported the drug of choice was ch elating. Today our children aren’t given the same chance to get better. The cure that was once used is now conveniently called anecdotal evidence. If it worked then, it will work now. If it was not dangerous then, it’s not dangerous now. Please look at this historical document entitled “The rise and fall of Pink Disease”. And please keep in mind that pink disease was contracted through oral ingestion of Mercury. Where as our children today are injected with Mercury. Oral ingestion travels through the bodies organs that filters out Mercury. And injected Mercury by-passes those filtering organs. It seems the opponents and sceptics that grew old and disappeared

from the scene are back and repeating history . . .

In the article below just remove the word Pinks and insert the word Autismand you will have today’s disaster in a man made disease just like Pinkswas and today it is a very well accepted as to the origin of the disease is being mercury poisoning

Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine, London.

This paper explores the social and medical history and context of pinkdisease (acrodynia), a serious disease of infants and young childrenthat baffled the medical world during the first half of the twentiethcentury until it was shown to be caused by mercury poisoning. In theEnglish-speaking world the commonest source of the mercury was teethingpowders, which were widely available and advertised with increasingsophistication. Efforts to control them (such as the BMJ’s campaign against‘Secret Remedies’) were as yet unsuccessful. The article discusses thesocial conditions that influenced the existence and recognition of pinkdisease, the delay in finding its cause, the way in which it wasexplained as a virus infection or nutritional deficiency and why it seldomoccurred outside the teething period. It discusses both professional andlay attitudes to health and diseases during the early twentieth

century.and provides a model of how the disease developed in a specific socialsetting and how the medical profession attempted to deal with it withinthe limitations of contemporary professional thought. The resistanceto the evidence of mercury poisoning is typical of resistance to newmedical knowledge and declined only when the opponents and sceptics grewold and disappeared from the scene. Meanwhile, the cause having beenidentified and accepted, pink disease disappeared, but its consequencesemerged much later, in an unexpected quarter, as a cause of maleinfertility.

Publication Types:Historical Article

PMID: 11619497 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE

Heres proof of the history of chealation working to stop an epidemicand the stupidy of the mainstream medical at large back then, It does appear that they have not gotten any brighter or maybe there just asgreedy.

[05/28/2000 1:44:08 AM](In fact, only 1 in 500 children exposed to the teething powders developedthe disease). In 1950 authoritative British medical opinion was still cautiousabout the mercury hypothesis-an understandable caution, yet responsible, asit turned out, for the prolongation of the epidemic, with uncountable cost inhuman and financial terms, for several years later.But slowly the evidence was stacking up against mercury. Dimercaprol(British anti-ite; BAL) is a chelating agent developed for military useagainst possible gas attacks and in the 1950s was the standard treatment forindustrial mercury poisoning. Several physicians gave their pink diseasepatients dimercaprol with gratifying cures. (The drug was never tested in aproper controlled clinical trial as the disease disappeared before such a trialcould be organized.)Warkany and Hubbard’s reports of an association between

mercuryexposure and the disease was confirmed by several other workers, thoughthese later reports also noted that urinary mercury levels were often high inhealthy children too. In the rare cases of industrial mercury poisoning thatoccurred, astute clinicians noted that in the recovery phase after the acuteillness, a condition indistinguishable from pink disease could be seen for a fewweeks. Clearly, if mercury was responsible for the disease, it could not besimple poisoning, or all exposed children would suffer in a dose relatedmanner; the children who became ill must be excessively sensitive to thepoison (idiosyncrasy).And there the matter rested at impasse between the mercury hypothesisand the manufacturers of mercurials. In the absence of decisive evidence,Parliament declined repeated calls to ban the products (although several statesin USA and Australia did so), and the disease remained a chronic

and fearfulcurse.The impasse was finally broken in 1953 by Dr J G Dathan ofStokes-on-Trent. Upset and incensed by the miserable deaths of 2 of his youngpatients and refusing to certify the deaths as due to natural causes, he referredthe cases to the coroner. The scientific cases for and against the mercuryhypothesis were arrayed against each other in an English court of law-surelyan unusual setting for a scientific debate.The jury found that the deaths were caused by mercury poisoning fromSteedman’s teething powder-in one case by frank overdose and in the otherbecause of unusual sensitivity of the child-and fearing litigation orParliamentary action the manufacturers immediately removed the mercuryfrom their preparations and recalled all old stocks.The other manufacturers gradually followed suit. 3 years later, inSheffield, the intake of mercurials and the incidence of pink disease had

bothdropped sharply and by 1966 Warkany, the originator of the mercuryhypothesis was able to write a final ‘post mortem’ article on pink disease inthe “American Journal of Diseases of Children”-a rare, but deserved accoladefor a dedicated (and lucky) medical scientist.The story illustrates the difficulty of achieving change when doctors are confronted by powerful commercial interests, and finds an echo in the 1980sin the continuing sagas of tobacco and lead. This is specially so when thecompanies can muster 1 or 2 experts who will say that “the evidence is not yetdecisive”.In truth it is still not proven beyond doubt that mercury caused pinkdisease and it is still possible that an epidemic virus, now fortunately passed,caused it. Of course, that explanation is very implausible and now that thedisease is departed no one is sufficiently interested to do more experiments. Itis also true that

had the world had waited for 100% proof of cause and effect,our children would probably still be ravaged by this dreadful, but preventabledisease.It would be dishonest to close the pink disease story without one lastremark, though as scientists we are embarrassed to have to make it. Warkanyand Hubbard’s original 1948 study on urinary mercury were drawn fromWarkany’s own practice in Cincinnati where the disease was rare and whereteething powders were rarely used. Had the control urines been taken fromthe geographical areas where patients came from, mercury would have beenfound in several apparently normal, healthy children, thus making theassociation far less striking. If Warkany and Hubbard had done ascientifically impeccable trial, the cause might never have been noticed.