Guest guest Posted November 22, 2008 Report Share Posted November 22, 2008 Fred Goodwin, proponent of prophylactically drugging children to control behavior, is losing his NPR show. Margaret Low , vp of NPR, has had every opportunity to axe other pharm-friendly hosts and pundits along with Fred Goodwin for a long time but didn't. That NPR would keep on this racist Goodwin as a host (Goodwin once publically and famously compared black youth to " monkeys in the jungle who just have sex and kill " as a justification to do spinal taps on black infants to find " genetic proof " of racial tendencies to violence) at all was shocking-- now they're canning him. I believe this is being done because ideology is suspected to go through a radical change under the new admin. The vax whores might be next, you never know. Dreaming's free, right? Subject: NPR Drops Infinite Mind hosted by Dr. Fred Goodwin To: " Infomail1ahrp (DOT) org " Date: Friday, November 21, 2008, 10:51 AM ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION Promoting Openness, Full Disclosure, and Accountability http://www.ahrp.org and http://ahrp.blogspot.com FYI The latest influential academic psychiatrist whose secret financial ties to drug makers have been documented by Senator E. Grassley, is Dr. Frederick K. Goodwin, a former director of the National Institute of Mental Health, who has for many years served as the host of national public radio's influential popular program, " The Infinite Mind. " Sen. Grassley's investigation reveals that Dr. Goodwin concealed the fact that he earned at least $1.3 million between 2000 and 2007 by giving marketing lectures for drug makers. Indeed, he introduced a March, 2008 broadcast titled " Prozac Nation: Revisited " by saying, " As you will hear today, there is no credible scientific evidence linking antidepressants to violence or to suicide. " That same week, Dr. Goodwin earned around $20,000 from GlaxoKline, the company that for years suppressed studies showing that its antidepressant, Paxil, increased suicidal behaviors. An article in SLATE (May 6, 2008) by Brownlee and Jeanne Lenzer, brought to light Dr. Goodwin's concealed financial conflicts of interest and his duplicitous use of NPR as a marketing venue. http://www.slate.com/id/2190775/SLATE The New York Times reports that " Margaret Low , vice president of National Public Radio, said that N.P.R. will remove " The Infinite Mind " from its satellite radio service next week, the earliest possible date. Ms. said that had N.P.R. been aware of Dr. Goodwin's financial interests, it would not have aired the program. " Dr. Goodwin's promotion of psychotropic drugs--not for therapeutic purposes, but as a means for controlling children's behavior--goes back to 1991 when he was the federal government's highest ranking psychiatrist as director of the (now defunct) Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration (ADAMHA). At that time he promoted the " Violence Initiative " which promoted a federal policy to use of psychotropic drugs to control inner city children's behavior. At a February 11, 1992 meeting of the prestigious National Advisory Mental Health Council Dr. Goodwin compared " inner city youth to monkeys who live in a jungle, who just want to kill each other, have sex and reproduce. " His remarks set off a public storm and he was forced to resign only to be appointed director of the National Institute of Mental Health. See: http://www.breggin.com/index.php?option=com_content & task=view & id=53 and http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html? res=9E0CE1DE1E3DF93BA35750C0A9649 58260 & sec= & spon= & & scp=5 & sq=fred goodwin monkeys & st=cse http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html? res=9E0CE2D61630F93BA15751C0A9649 58260 & scp=1 & sq=fredgoodwinmonkeys & st=cse Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav veracare@... http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/22/health/22radio.html?em Popular Radio Host Has Drug Company Ties By GARDINER HARRIS Published: November 21, 2008 An influential psychiatrist who served as the host of public radio's popular " The Infinite Mind " program earned at least $1.3 million between 2000 and 2007 giving marketing lectures for drug makers, income not mentioned on the program. The psychiatrist and radio host, Dr. Frederick K. Goodwin, is the latest in a series of doctors and researchers whose ties to drug makers have been uncovered by Senator E. Grassley, a Republican from Iowa. Dr. Goodwin, a former director of the National Institute of Mental Health, is the first media figure investigated. Dr. Goodwin's radio programs have often touched on subjects important to the commercial interests of the companies for which he consults. In a program broadcast on Sept. 20, 2005, Dr. Goodwin warned that children with bipolar disorder who are left untreated could suffer brain damage, a controversial view. " But as we'll be hearing today, " Dr. Goodwin reassured his audience, " modern treatments ¬ mood stabilizers in particular ¬ have been proven both safe and effective in bipolar children. " That very day, GlaxoKline paid Dr. Goodwin $2,500 to give a promotional lecture for its mood stabilizer drug, Lamictal, at the Ritz Carlton Golf Resort in Naples, Fla. Indeed, Glaxo paid Dr. Goodwin more than $329,000 that year for promoting Lamictal, records given Congressional investigators show. In an interview, Dr. Goodwin said that Bill Lichtenstein, the program's producer, knew of his consulting activities but that neither he nor Mr. Lichtenstein thought that " getting money from drug companies could be an issue. In retrospect, that should have been disclosed. " But Mr. Lichtenstein said that he was unaware of Dr. Goodwin's financial ties to drug makers and that he called Dr. Goodwin earlier this year " and asked him point-blank if he was receiving funding from pharmaceutical companies, directly or indirectly, and the answer was, `No.' " " The fact that he was out on the stump for pharmaceutical companies was not something we were aware of. It would have violated our agreements, " Mr. Lichtenstein said in an interview. Margaret Low , vice president of National Public Radio, said that N.P.R. will remove " The Infinite Mind " from its satellite radio service next week, the earliest possible date. Ms. said that had N.P.R. been aware of Dr. Goodwin's financial interests, it would not have aired the program. Alspach, a spokeswoman for Glaxo, said, " We continue to believe that healthcare professionals are responsible for making disclosures to their employers and other entities, in this case National Public Radio and its listeners. " " The Infinite Mind " is a weekly program that has won more than 60 journalism awards over 10 years and bills itself as " public radio's most honored and listened to health and science program. " It has more than one million listeners in more than 300 radio markets. Mr. Lichtenstein said that the last original program aired in October, that reruns have been airing since and that " the show is going off the air. " The program has received major underwriting from the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation, both of which have policies requiring grantees to disclose and manage conflicts of interest. Mr. Grassley wrote letters to both agencies asking whether disclosure rules were followed for the grants. Spokespeople for both agencies said they were cooperating with the investigation. Mr. Grassley is systematically asking some of the nation's leading researchers and doctors to provide their conflict-of-interest disclosures, and Mr. Grassley is comparing those documents with records of actual payments from drug companies. The records often conflict, sometimes starkly. In October, Mr. Grassley revealed that Dr. B. Nemeroff of Emory University, one of the nation's most influential psychiatric researchers, earned more than $2.8 million in consulting arrangements with drug makers from 2000 to 2007, failed to report at least $1.2 million of that income to his university and violated federal research rules. As a result, the National Institutes of Health suspended a $9.3 million research grant to Emory and placed restrictions on other grants, and Dr. Nemeroff relinquished his chairmanship of Emory's psychiatry department. In June, the senator revealed that Harvard University's Dr. ph Biederman, whose work has fueled an explosion in the use of powerful antipsychotic medicines in children, had earned at least $1.6 million from drug makers between 2000 and 2007, failed to report most of this income to his university, and may have violated federal and university research rules. Mr. Grassley's investigation demonstrates how deeply pharmaceutical commercial interests reach into academic medicine, and it has shown that universities are all but incapable of policing these arrangements. As a result of these revelations, almost every major medical school and medical society is now reassessing its relationships with drug and device makers. " We know the drug companies are throwing huge amounts of money at medical researchers, and there's no clear-cut way to know how much and exactly where, " Mr. Grassley said. " Now it looks like the same thing is happening in journalism. " Mr. Grassley has proposed legislation that would require drug makers to publicly post all payments of $500 or more made to doctors. Eli Lilly and Merck have promised to begin posting such payments next year. Dr. Goodwin has authored an influential textbook on bipolar disorder and is an adjunct professor at Washington University. In an extensive interview, Dr. Goodwin blamed a changing ethical environment for any misunderstandings between himself and Mr. Lichtenstein about his consulting arrangements. " More than 10 years ago when he and I got involved in this effort, it didn't occur to me that my doing what every other expert in the field does might be considered a conflict of interest, " Dr. Goodwin said. He defended the views he expressed in many of his radio programs and said that, because he consults for so many drug makers at once, he has no particular bias. " These companies compete with each other and cancel each other out, " he said. This view is dismissed by industry critics, who say that experts who consult widely for drug makers tend to minimize the value of non-drug or older drug treatments. In the fine print of a study he authored in 2003, Dr. Goodwin reported consulting or speaking for nine drug makers. Mr. Grassley only asked for payment information from Glaxo. Dr. Goodwin said that in recent years Glaxo paid him more than other companies. He said that he has never given marketing lectures for antidepressant medicines like Prozac, so he saw no conflict with a program he hosted in March titled " Prozac Nation: Revisited " that he introduced by saying, " As you will hear today, there is no credible scientific evidence linking antidepressants to violence or to suicide. " That same week, Dr. Goodwin earned around $20,000 from Glaxo, which for years suppressed studies showing that its antidepressant, Paxil, increased suicidal behaviors. Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, said that although concerns about media bias are growing, few people believe that journalists take money from those they cover. Disclosures like those surrounding Dr. Goodwin could change that, " so this kind of thing is very damaging, " Mr. Rosenstiel said. FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without profit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.