Re: Shouldn't this standard be ZERO???

November 29, 2008

Well, before Kraft and other big food co's were implicated for

tainted products, the FDA reported it would have zero tolerance for

melamine. Now their tune has changed to the one we're most accostomed

to-- you know, a little toxic mutant crap won't hurt yer kid...not

that much.

In the way that death and autism are just the most noticable tips of

the iceberg regarding the array and rate of vaccine adverse

reactions, kidney stones and death may be just the tips of the

melamine iceberg. I wonder if there's going to be a widespread

reaction to the melamine in American products that no one's going to

immediately understand because we're carefully not being told about

the potential range of symptoms. The stuff accumulates and the way

the FDA is behaving, I'm going to assume this junk is in tons of

consumer products right now, like the pet food poisoning issue.

Google " melamine " and various symptoms (melamine + rash, etc.) and

you turn up posts by Chinese parents reporting reactsion to tainted

formula that the Chinese press will not. These are also symptoms

which the FDA-- with the help of the US press-- probably doesn't want

American parents to know are linked to poisoning.

>

> FDA sets melamine standard for baby formula

>

November 30, 2008

Something tells me that the IEP rates will jump again in 5 years and

the only thing we will hear is, " See? It's not the mercury. "

CGF

> >

> > FDA sets melamine standard for baby formula

> >

>

November 30, 2008

Yeah, so true. Just wait a couple of years – can’t wait to see

how they justify the jump in autism in NJ with the added flu vaccine and the

other ones they added as well. Sad thing is, my son is the only one in the

pre-k disabled class who has an exemption.

If we ever do have another child, I would never, ever trust

formula again – 1 ppm is too much for me.