Guest guest Posted December 5, 2008 Report Share Posted December 5, 2008 Removing incentive for product safety is going in the wrong direction. We have seen what a disaster this solution has caused in the US. Lenny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2008 Report Share Posted December 7, 2008 I am going to disagree with you in part. I believe the probliem with this is not the " no-fault " compensation idea per se, but rather how it is applied in the US. For instance, when the powers-that-be set the threshholds for compensatable claims arbitrarily too strict, and often in direct contrast to what the manufacturers' own research shows to be true, that is not the fault of the no-fault system. Likewise, when pediatricians are urged to disregard the product inserts guidelines for contra0indication, that is not the fault of the no-fault system. What we need is for our system here in the STates to be enacted and utilized as it was intended by Congress when they wrote the law. A good first step would be to remove from the process all those individuals who are in direct conflict due to their investments, income streams and other personal relationships and get some honest people involved. Yeh, I know, and the Fatman will come sliding down my chimney in three weeks... Re: National Post Story Posted by: " schaferatsprynet " schafer@... schaferatsprynet Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:57 am (PST) Removing incentive for product safety is going in the wrong direction. We have seen what a disaster this solution has caused in the US. Lenny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 But Lenny, You have to believe it will happen!! Candyce Re: National Post Story I am going to disagree with you in part. I believe the probliem with this is not the "no-fault" compensation idea per se, but rather how it is applied in the US.For instance, when the powers-that-be set the threshholds for compensatable claims arbitrarily too strict, and often in direct contrast to what the manufacturers' own research shows to be true, that is not the fault of the no-fault system.Likewise, when pediatricians are urged to disregard the product inserts guidelines for contra0indication, that is not the fault of the no-fault system.What we need is for our system here in the STates to be enacted and utilized as it was intended by Congress when they wrote the law. A good first step would be to remove from the process all those individuals who are in direct conflict due to their investments, income streams and other personal relationships and get some honest people involved.Yeh, I know, and the Fatman will come sliding down my chimney in three weeks...Re: National Post Story Posted by: "schaferatsprynet" schafersprynet schaferatsprynet Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:57 am (PST) Removing incentive for product safety is going in the wrong direction.We have seen what a disaster this solution has caused in the US.Lenny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 8, 2008 Report Share Posted December 8, 2008 No, it won't happen! There ARE powers that be that will make sure it doesn't! The sooner you accept this the sooner you'll be able to answer the unanswerable. The sooner you will believe the unbelievable. The object of these power mongers IS to decrease the population and the sooner the better as all you know what is about to break loose when people can't feed their family. The only way to control the masses is to decrease the masses and time IS running out! Jehovah God is our only hope and most folks don't want him. Connie > > But Lenny, > You have to believe it will happen!! > Candyce > Re: National Post Story > > > I am going to disagree with you in part. I believe the probliem with this is not the " no-fault " compensation idea per se, but rather how it is applied in the US. > > For instance, when the powers-that-be set the threshholds for compensatable claims arbitrarily too strict, and often in direct contrast to what the manufacturers' own research shows to be true, that is not the fault of the no-fault system. > > Likewise, when pediatricians are urged to disregard the product inserts guidelines for contra0indication, that is not the fault of the no-fault system. > > What we need is for our system here in the STates to be enacted and utilized as it was intended by Congress when they wrote the law. A good first step would be to remove from the process all those individuals who are in direct conflict due to their investments, income streams and other personal relationships and get some honest people involved. > > Yeh, I know, and the Fatman will come sliding down my chimney in three weeks... > > Re: National Post Story > Posted by: " schaferatsprynet " schafer@... schaferatsprynet > Fri Dec 5, 2008 11:57 am (PST) > Removing incentive for product safety is going in the wrong direction. > We have seen what a disaster this solution has caused in the US. > > Lenny > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.