Guest guest Posted December 16, 2008 Report Share Posted December 16, 2008 With reference to asthma ( which my son has!), there was a recent study (in Canada, I think) that showed by delaying the first DtaP to 4 mo ( normal is at 2 mo), the asthma rates were reduced by 50%. That is pretty striking! Good luck! C. Houston > > Asthma and it's subsequent complications claims 12 lives per day in > > America. > > Does anybody have more detailed data on this - like a breakdown by > state and month? I'm sure the 12 is an average over the entire year, > and asthma-related problems are known to be linked to air quality > (both), and pollen I think (both), and possibly temperature (month > and possibly location too). Poverty (location-related, but in a very > complicated way) also enters into it as that's a weak proxy for > 'healthcare' (meaning rescue inhalers and inhalers that aren't > expired when they need to be used). > > Also, I'd love to know where to get data to make a chart of asthma > against vax rates against time, possibly in different countries. > This would be a very tough analysis to do right (just like autism/vax > analysis is tough to do right), but the general trends should be > there and would be striking, assuming there are no obvious holes the > NDers can poke.. If certain vaxes are though to be more involved > (HepB?) were introduced first in some states, and there was enough of > a lag until other states adopted - that might show up in the data > too. " Racial " incidence data might show something interesting, but I > think not - I think that would just pattern with (and be explained > by) a poverty relation. Gender rate data would be interesting too - > is there a boy-skewing effect for asthma like there is for autism? > > Other than vaxes, were there any other things going into the > environment that would contribute to an increase? This would be very > hard to do unless you wanted to do a Palmer-type analysis by distance > from particulate-point-sources or something like that (does Palmer > read ABMD?). > > Data from other countries, especially Denmark where I've head they > only have *3* vaccines used over a 3-5 year period (and STILL have > adverse events!) would be quite interesting, but too hard to compare > given the differences in pollution, lifestyle, poverty, healthcare, etc. > > Jim > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.