Re: Bird Flu vax experiment on children

[Guest guest]

On day 21, the rate of protection was 75 percent. Similar results using the same vaccine were reported last year following a clinical trial involving 146 adults. And how on Earth did they test "rate of protection"? Antibodies? In vitro blood studies on T and B cells? You can't ethically expose people with H5N1 - not unless we have gone back to the days of Tuskeegee.. If only because you'd potentially expose an entire unvaccinated population to a virus that has been shown to be quite dangerous, and to which the human immune system appears to have very little defense..Vajo's team also points out that Fluval requires only one dose, while Well, thank God for that - less mercury as I'm sure they'll only put out a mercury containing version - although the EU might prohibit that.. Of course, with only 1 vax instead of 2, does that potentially do more unintended damage to the neuro-immune system and other things?Jim

[Guest guest]

The Bird Flu will likely be triggered by a vaccine

> > On day 21, the rate of protection was 75 percent. Similar results

> > using the same vaccine were reported last year following a clinical

> > trial involving 146 adults.

> >

> And how on Earth did they test " rate of protection " ? Antibodies?

> In vitro blood studies on T and B cells? You can't ethically expose

> people with H5N1 - not unless we have gone back to the days of

> Tuskeegee.. If only because you'd potentially expose an entire

> unvaccinated population to a virus that has been shown to be quite

> dangerous, and to which the human immune system appears to have very

> little defense..

>

> > Vajo's team also points out that Fluval requires only one dose, while

> >

> Well, thank God for that - less mercury as I'm sure they'll only

> put out a mercury containing version - although the EU might prohibit

> that.. Of course, with only 1 vax instead of 2, does that

> potentially do more unintended damage to the neuro-immune system and

> other things?

>

> Jim

>

[Guest guest]

---

This will be a nice way to cause an outbreak so they can sell thier

stock.

In EOHarm , Jim Witte wrote:

>

>

>

> > On day 21, the rate of protection was 75 percent. Similar results

> > using the same vaccine were reported last year following a

clinical

> > trial involving 146 adults.

> >

> And how on Earth did they test " rate of protection " ?

Antibodies?

> In vitro blood studies on T and B cells? You can't ethically

expose

> people with H5N1 - not unless we have gone back to the days of

> Tuskeegee.. If only because you'd potentially expose an entire

> unvaccinated population to a virus that has been shown to be quite

> dangerous, and to which the human immune system appears to have

very

> little defense..

>

> > Vajo's team also points out that Fluval requires only one dose,

while

> >

> Well, thank God for that - less mercury as I'm sure they'll

only

> put out a mercury containing version - although the EU might

prohibit

> that.. Of course, with only 1 vax instead of 2, does that

> potentially do more unintended damage to the neuro-immune system

and

> other things?

>

> Jim

>