Guest guest Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 From: " Carl E. Grimes " <grimes@...> Date: Mon Oct 11, 2004 1:29 pm Subject: Re: []^ Ozone educational web sites This is my last comment on this ozone discussion: Ozone is not enriched oxygen. Ozone is a pollutant. The two have different properties. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ ----- From: " Jim H. White " <systemsa@...> Date: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:20 pm Subject: Re: [iequality] IAQ in central ac systems systemsa@... iequality/message/3299 Ozone generators and/or ozone should never be used in occupied spaces as it does lung damage even at low concentrations. Any employee satisfaction can be due to damage smell sensors in the nasal passages, not in a real improvement. See Health Canada (http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hecs-sesc/cps/publications/ozone.htm http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hecs-sesc/cps/publications/ozone_qa.htm) and the US EPA (http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/ozonegen.html http://www.epa.gov/iaq/pubs/airclean.html) sites for reasons why you should not use ozone indoors. Jim H. White SSAL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Jeff May <Jeff@...> Date: Thu Oct 7, 2004 10:31 pm Subject: Re: Ozone for killing mold 1. Common indoor molds (Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, etc.) are NOT wood-destroying organisms (many cannot even digest cellulose), so they do not consume wood in our houses. Even Stachybotrys, which can be cellulolytic, does not destroy wood; these molds are called microfungi. Brown rots and white rots (mushroom-forming fungi or macrofungi) destroy wood, digesting either cellulose, lignin or both.. Though there are outdoor (and indoor) spores in the air, mold is not all around us and in every room (unless in a very problem environment). 4. As Jim Holland noted in a previous e-mail, FDA-approved ozone generators do NOT inhibit the growth of fungi or even kill spores. On the other hand, many ozone generators create concentrations of ozone above the FDA limit of .05 ppm. (Anyone with an ionizer or ozone generator concerned about ozone concentrations can purchase a two-test kit from IQAir for about $8.) 5. Filtration is the most effective means to remove aerosolized particulates. 6. Air purifiers may remove spores from the air, but they do NOT control mold. As you noted, the only way to control mold growth is to control relative humidity and water. It is foolish to spend money on any type of air purifier without eliminating the obvious sources of spores first. Jeff May Author, " The Mold Survival Guide " s Hopkins University Press >1. Our focus should first be protecting ourselves from the effects of mold spores... and secondly protecting out home from mold... We must remember that mold to grow must consume cellulose thus mold in a home is slowly consuming the wood from which the house was built.. Mold is all around us and in every room... What affects us is a high concentration of mold spores; at a certain level we become affected... Good ventilation and controlled humidity are important... A sealed building invites mold development. >4. Ozone generators can inhibit growth of fungi/mold.. The mustiness of a mildewed room can be controlled/eliminated by ozone generators.. >5. Ion generators electrify the air and make it difficult for mold spores to float thus making it somewhat difficult for the eyes and nose to be troubled by the " spore dust " .. >6. Some air purifiers work and work well at controlling mold but many do not.... I'd only buy one with a satisfaction guarantee where you get your money back within 20 days if it doesn't work to your satisfaction... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ --------- From: RLLIPSEY87@... Date: Wed May 28, 2003 8:53 am Subject: Re: [] Digest Number 1636 Ozone is a toxic chemical whether it is produced naturally in a thunderstorm or produced by ozonators or " air purifiers " (or sold by any other name) . Ozone is an OSHA regulated toxic chemical which is 500 times more toxic than carbon monoxide (CO) that kills hundreds of people each year. The federal air standard for ozone is only 0.1 ppm while it is 50 ppm for CO. Ozone attacks mucous membranes, ie the lungs, and causes chronic respiratory disease. NIOSH has published that ozone is not very effective in killing mold or bacteria. Ozone is not " controversial " . It is toxic and dangerous and not effective in controlling mold or bacteria and should never be used in a room with people present, even to remove odors ie smoke damage odors. Dr. L. Lipsey Professor and Toxicologist University of North Florida, ---OSHA HazMat Cert. U. of Florida Med. Ctr, Jax Poison Control Center Board CV--Toxicology And Environmental Health Assoc --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ ------- From: RLLIPSEY87@... Date: Tue Sep 6, 2005 8:42 am Subject: Re: [] Digest Number 2563 RLLIPSEY87@... All the talk about Ozone machines on this site concern me. OZONE is relatively ineffective against mold but very effective against odors according to NIOSH, US Public Health Service. They may be called Ionizing machines or even air cleaners or 100 different names as dealers are trying to hide the fact that they are nothing by ozone generators. NEVER allow these machines to be used with people present in offices or homes. You never know just how much ozone they are actually emitting. I have served as an expert witness where these companies were sued. OZONE is also 500 times more toxic than carbon monoxide gas and 100 times more toxic than hydrogen cyanide gas used in Nazi concentration camps (NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, 1997 comparing OSHA PEL's )..............so why use these machines in homes? Ultrasound bug killers are in the same class, or lack of class, in that mosquitos do NOT hear ultrasound, nor do cockroaches, so why should ultrasound machines drive them away. I put on a debate at the national meeting of the Entomological Society of America many years ago in Detroit with EPA officers present to hear first hand that those machines are absolutely useless...........and the EPA officers commented that they cannot protect the public from harmless and useless devices and " let the buyer beware " . Dr. L. Lipsey ( 904 ) 398-2168 Toxicologist and Instructor University of North Florida, HazMat/OSHA Univ. Fla. Medical Center Jax, Poison Control Board Fla. Comm. College Jax, Institute of Occ. Safety & Health www.richardlipsey.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ ----------- Professor Shaughnessy, University of Tulsa Docent Aino Nevalainen, KTL Ulla Haverinen-Shaughnessy, PhD -shaughnessy@... Shaughnessy is program manager for the Indoor Air Pollution Research Center at the University of Tulsa. He oversees IAQ training efforts for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and serves as a consultant to the Consumer Product Safety Commission on its review of ozone-generating air cleaners International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ) Secretary, Shaughnessy J. Shaughnessy, Ph.D., received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Tulsa. He has served as Program Director of IAQ Research at the University of Tulsa since 1987. He has taught and conducted research abroad in locations including Singapore, China, Australia, Philippines, and South Africa. He has published extensively on indoor air with respect to his research and studies. Dr. Shaughnessy has worked on U.S.EPA grant projects since 1990 encompassing issues such as training development, course delivery and outreach, schools investigations, and implementation of the Tools for Schools Program. His interests are primarily in particulate research, air cleaner evaluation, indoor chemistry, school studies, flooring studies, asthma/housing research, and studies related to resolution and remediation of bioaerosol-related problems. He served on the ACGIH Bioaerosols Committee from 1996 through December, 2003 and contributed to the writing of the 1999 ACGIH " Bioaerosols Assessment and Control " Document. He is the primary author of two chapters of the book pertaining to prevention and control, and remediation. He was a primary task force member and moderator for the recent 2003 ACGIH-sponsored Symposium on Mold Remediation. He assisted in the development of IICRC's S-520 document on mold remediation, serving on the Standards Committee and the S-520 Editing Committee. He was appointed in September, 2003 to the Oklahoma legislative task force on mold, and is currently developing recommendations to the legislature on mold-related legislation. He has recently been invited (December, 2003) by the American Society of Microbiology (Washington, DC) to participate, with a select group of 6 coauthors, in developing an informational brochure on addressing mold in the indoor environment, for the purpose of formulating reasonable legislation in the U.S. Congress. He has recently been appointed (Jan, 2004) by AIHA to the Management/Editorial Committee overseeing the development of extensive new guidance related to best practices in addressing the evaluation, assessment and remediation of mold in the indoor environment. He is also assisting the NYC DOH on new guidance that is being promulgated (January, 2004) related to worker protection in mold remediation situations. He has recently been appointed (December, 2003) for a three year term to the Board of Directors for the International Society on Indoor Air Quality (ISIAQ). --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ -- Subject: Aerotech Laboratories, IAQ Tech Tip #62: Ozone Generators and IAQ Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:47:29 -0700 Ozone Generators and IAQ With the considerable recent media attention focused on the issues of indoor air quality, microbial contaminants in particular, ozone is once again being touted as a remedy for all manner of indoor air quality concerns. Marketing literature from distributors of ozone generators boast claims of eliminating microbial contaminants through the use of ozone. One website claims " Ozone helps kill mold and mold odors with large ozone dose shock treatments " and " Ozone may be the only way to save your home from deadly mold " . The propaganda goes as far as claiming that ozone destroys mold leaving only oxygen, hydrogen and carbon dioxide. These are the kind of unsubstantiated claims that led to a $1.49 million civil penalty against Alpine Industries in April of 2001 and a Court Order to cease making health claims for its ozone generators. A recent study has demonstrated that gas phase ozone is ineffective in reducing the viability of Penicillium spores on building materials at levels as high as 9 parts per million (ppm), levels that are much higher than those attainable under field conditions (Appl.Occup.Environ.Hyg. 12(8), August 1997). Recent studies have also implicated a synergistic effect between fungal spores and ozone and increased symptoms of asthma in asthma patients using an inhaler on an as-needed basis (Am.J.Respir.Crit.Care.Med. 154(3 Pt 1):633-41, Sept. 1996). The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) limits ozone exposure in industrial settings to 0.1 ppm over an eight hour day, six days per week. The Food and Drug Administration has set a limit of 0.05 ppm for the ozone generated from electronic air cleaners used as medical devices. The Environmental Protection Agency has stated: Available evidence shows that, at concentrations that do not exceed public health standards, ozone is generally ineffective in controlling indoor air pollution. The concentration of ozone would have to greatly exceed health standards to be effective in removing most indoor air contaminants To read the entire EPA article please visit " Ozone Generators that are Sold as Air Cleaners " --------------------------------------------------------------------------------\ ---------- " Jim H. White " <systemsa@...> fourbrownpaws Re: [iequality] Ionizing air cleaners Smogwatcher Almost all of these are just ozone machines renamed. ozone kills lung tissue and makes asthma worse. Why are you considering one of these nefarious machine? See the California publications on ozone machines in occupied dwellings. In Canada, Health Canada also strongly recommends against them. The US EPA is against them, but not quite as vehemently. Jim H. White System Science Consulting [iequality] Ionizing air cleaners Does anyone know of research into effects of ion generating air cleaning devices on respiratory health / asthma? ================================================ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 I think we can all agree no one should ever breath Ozone. It is a pollutant in that respect ofcourse. The Olympic pool for the 2008 Beijing Olympics (state of the art) was cleaned and sanitized by one thing, it was Ozone. Not one drop of Chlorine was used. Countless cities across the globe (not is usa i dont think) are now using Ozone gas for purifying public water sources deemed safe for human consumption. If you pick up some purified water bottles at your local grocery store you will see the terms " filtered by ozonation " , some not all ofcourse. No one should ever breath in Ozone, In my opinion it can kill you. But its obvious some uses of Ozone can benefit society when done and used by professionals. IMHO Elias From: KC <tigerpaw2c@...> Subject: [] Re: ozone therapy Reply to Mr Grimes (Ozone is a pollutant) Date: Friday, February 5, 2010, 3:29 PM  From: " Carl E. Grimes " <grimeshabitats (DOT) com> Date: Mon Oct 11, 2004 1:29 pm Subject: Re: [] ^ Ozone educational web sites This is my last comment on this ozone discussion: Ozone is not enriched oxygen. Ozone is a pollutant. The two have different properties. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - From: " Jim H. White " <systemsa@.. .> Date: Sat Jun 25, 2005 1:20 pm Subject: Re: [iequality] IAQ in central ac systems systemsa@... http://health. groups.. com/group/ iequality/ message/3299 Ozone generators and/or ozone should never be used in occupied spaces as it does lung damage even at low concentrations. Any employee satisfaction can be due to damage smell sensors in the nasal passages, not in a real improvement. See Health Canada (http://www.hc- sc.gc.ca/ hecs-sesc/ cps/publications /ozone.htm http://www.hc- sc.gc.ca/ hecs-sesc/ cps/publications /ozone_qa. htm) and the US EPA (http://www.epa. gov/iaq/pubs/ ozonegen. html http://www.epa. gov/iaq/pubs/ airclean. html) sites for reasons why you should not use ozone indoors. Jim H. White SSAL ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - From: Jeff May <Jeff@...> Date: Thu Oct 7, 2004 10:31 pm Subject: Re: Ozone for killing mold 1. Common indoor molds (Penicillium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, etc.) are NOT wood-destroying organisms (many cannot even digest cellulose), so they do not consume wood in our houses. Even Stachybotrys, which can be cellulolytic, does not destroy wood; these molds are called microfungi. Brown rots and white rots (mushroom-forming fungi or macrofungi) destroy wood, digesting either cellulose, lignin or both.. Though there are outdoor (and indoor) spores in the air, mold is not all around us and in every room (unless in a very problem environment) . 4. As Jim Holland noted in a previous e-mail, FDA-approved ozone generators do NOT inhibit the growth of fungi or even kill spores. On the other hand, many ozone generators create concentrations of ozone above the FDA limit of .05 ppm. (Anyone with an ionizer or ozone generator concerned about ozone concentrations can purchase a two-test kit from IQAir for about $8.) 5. Filtration is the most effective means to remove aerosolized particulates. 6. Air purifiers may remove spores from the air, but they do NOT control mold. As you noted, the only way to control mold growth is to control relative humidity and water. It is foolish to spend money on any type of air purifier without eliminating the obvious sources of spores first. Jeff May Author, " The Mold Survival Guide " s Hopkins University Press >1. Our focus should first be protecting ourselves from the effects of mold spores... and secondly protecting out home from mold... We must remember that mold to grow must consume cellulose thus mold in a home is slowly consuming the wood from which the house was built.. Mold is all around us and in every room... What affects us is a high concentration of mold spores; at a certain level we become affected... Good ventilation and controlled humidity are important... A sealed building invites mold development. >4. Ozone generators can inhibit growth of fungi/mold.. The mustiness of a mildewed room can be controlled/eliminat ed by ozone generators.. >5. Ion generators electrify the air and make it difficult for mold spores to float thus making it somewhat difficult for the eyes and nose to be troubled by the " spore dust " .. >6. Some air purifiers work and work well at controlling mold but many do not.... I'd only buy one with a satisfaction guarantee where you get your money back within 20 days if it doesn't work to your satisfaction. .. ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - From: RLLIPSEY87AOL (DOT) COM Date: Wed May 28, 2003 8:53 am Subject: Re: [] Digest Number 1636 Ozone is a toxic chemical whether it is produced naturally in a thunderstorm or produced by ozonators or " air purifiers " (or sold by any other name) . Ozone is an OSHA regulated toxic chemical which is 500 times more toxic than carbon monoxide (CO) that kills hundreds of people each year. The federal air standard for ozone is only 0.1 ppm while it is 50 ppm for CO. Ozone attacks mucous membranes, ie the lungs, and causes chronic respiratory disease. NIOSH has published that ozone is not very effective in killing mold or bacteria. Ozone is not " controversial " . It is toxic and dangerous and not effective in controlling mold or bacteria and should never be used in a room with people present, even to remove odors ie smoke damage odors. Dr. L. Lipsey Professor and Toxicologist University of North Florida, ---OSHA HazMat Cert. U. of Florida Med. Ctr, Jax Poison Control Center Board CV--Toxicology And Environmental Health Assoc ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - From: RLLIPSEY87AOL (DOT) COM Date: Tue Sep 6, 2005 8:42 am Subject: Re: [] Digest Number 2563 RLLIPSEY87AOL (DOT) COM All the talk about Ozone machines on this site concern me. OZONE is relatively ineffective against mold but very effective against odors according to NIOSH, US Public Health Service. They may be called Ionizing machines or even air cleaners or 100 different names as dealers are trying to hide the fact that they are nothing by ozone generators. NEVER allow these machines to be used with people present in offices or homes. You never know just how much ozone they are actually emitting. I have served as an expert witness where these companies were sued. OZONE is also 500 times more toxic than carbon monoxide gas and 100 times more toxic than hydrogen cyanide gas used in Nazi concentration camps (NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards, 1997 comparing OSHA PEL's )........... ...so why use these machines in homes? Ultrasound bug killers are in the same class, or lack of class, in that mosquitos do NOT hear ultrasound, nor do cockroaches, so why should ultrasound machines drive them away. I put on a debate at the national meeting of the Entomological Society of America many years ago in Detroit with EPA officers present to hear first hand that those machines are absolutely useless..... ......and the EPA officers commented that they cannot protect the public from harmless and useless devices and " let the buyer beware " . Dr. L. Lipsey ( 904 ) 398-2168 Toxicologist and Instructor University of North Florida, HazMat/OSHA Univ. Fla. Medical Center Jax, Poison Control Board Fla. Comm. College Jax, Institute of Occ. Safety & Health www.richardlipsey. com ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - Professor Shaughnessy, University of Tulsa Docent Aino Nevalainen, KTL Ulla Haverinen-Shaughnes sy, PhD -shaughnessy @utulsa.edu Shaughnessy is program manager for the Indoor Air Pollution Research Center at the University of Tulsa. He oversees IAQ training efforts for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and serves as a consultant to the Consumer Product Safety Commission on its review of ozone-generating air cleaners International Society of Indoor Air Quality and Climate (ISIAQ) Secretary, Shaughnessy J. Shaughnessy, Ph.D., received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Tulsa. He has served as Program Director of IAQ Research at the University of Tulsa since 1987. He has taught and conducted research abroad in locations including Singapore, China, Australia, Philippines, and South Africa. He has published extensively on indoor air with respect to his research and studies. Dr. Shaughnessy has worked on U.S.EPA grant projects since 1990 encompassing issues such as training development, course delivery and outreach, schools investigations, and implementation of the Tools for Schools Program. His interests are primarily in particulate research, air cleaner evaluation, indoor chemistry, school studies, flooring studies, asthma/housing research, and studies related to resolution and remediation of bioaerosol-related problems. He served on the ACGIH Bioaerosols Committee from 1996 through December, 2003 and contributed to the writing of the 1999 ACGIH " Bioaerosols Assessment and Control " Document. He is the primary author of two chapters of the book pertaining to prevention and control, and remediation. He was a primary task force member and moderator for the recent 2003 ACGIH-sponsored Symposium on Mold Remediation. He assisted in the development of IICRC's S-520 document on mold remediation, serving on the Standards Committee and the S-520 Editing Committee. He was appointed in September, 2003 to the Oklahoma legislative task force on mold, and is currently developing recommendations to the legislature on mold-related legislation. He has recently been invited (December, 2003) by the American Society of Microbiology (Washington, DC) to participate, with a select group of 6 coauthors, in developing an informational brochure on addressing mold in the indoor environment, for the purpose of formulating reasonable legislation in the U.S. Congress. He has recently been appointed (Jan, 2004) by AIHA to the Management/Editoria l Committee overseeing the development of extensive new guidance related to best practices in addressing the evaluation, assessment and remediation of mold in the indoor environment. He is also assisting the NYC DOH on new guidance that is being promulgated (January, 2004) related to worker protection in mold remediation situations. He has recently been appointed (December, 2003) for a three year term to the Board of Directors for the International Society on Indoor Air Quality (ISIAQ). ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - Subject: Aerotech Laboratories, IAQ Tech Tip #62: Ozone Generators and IAQ Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:47:29 -0700 Ozone Generators and IAQ With the considerable recent media attention focused on the issues of indoor air quality, microbial contaminants in particular, ozone is once again being touted as a remedy for all manner of indoor air quality concerns. Marketing literature from distributors of ozone generators boast claims of eliminating microbial contaminants through the use of ozone. One website claims " Ozone helps kill mold and mold odors with large ozone dose shock treatments " and " Ozone may be the only way to save your home from deadly mold " . The propaganda goes as far as claiming that ozone destroys mold leaving only oxygen, hydrogen and carbon dioxide. These are the kind of unsubstantiated claims that led to a $1.49 million civil penalty against Alpine Industries in April of 2001 and a Court Order to cease making health claims for its ozone generators. A recent study has demonstrated that gas phase ozone is ineffective in reducing the viability of Penicillium spores on building materials at levels as high as 9 parts per million (ppm), levels that are much higher than those attainable under field conditions (Appl.Occup. Environ.Hyg. 12(8), August 1997). Recent studies have also implicated a synergistic effect between fungal spores and ozone and increased symptoms of asthma in asthma patients using an inhaler on an as-needed basis (Am.J.Respir. Crit.Care. Med. 154(3 Pt 1):633-41, Sept. 1996). The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) limits ozone exposure in industrial settings to 0.1 ppm over an eight hour day, six days per week. The Food and Drug Administration has set a limit of 0.05 ppm for the ozone generated from electronic air cleaners used as medical devices. The Environmental Protection Agency has stated: Available evidence shows that, at concentrations that do not exceed public health standards, ozone is generally ineffective in controlling indoor air pollution. The concentration of ozone would have to greatly exceed health standards to be effective in removing most indoor air contaminants To read the entire EPA article please visit " Ozone Generators that are Sold as Air Cleaners " ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - " Jim H. White " <systemsa@.. .> fourbrownpaws Re: [iequality] Ionizing air cleaners Smogwatcher Almost all of these are just ozone machines renamed. ozone kills lung tissue and makes asthma worse. Why are you considering one of these nefarious machine? See the California publications on ozone machines in occupied dwellings. In Canada, Health Canada also strongly recommends against them. The US EPA is against them, but not quite as vehemently. Jim H. White System Science Consulting [iequality] Ionizing air cleaners Does anyone know of research into effects of ion generating air cleaning devices on respiratory health / asthma? ============ ========= ========= ========= ========= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2010 Report Share Posted February 5, 2010 Elias, First, thanks for responding to my private e-mail. I'm much more comfortable with what you are trying to do because you said you don't sell the equipment or services. We've had other people in the past who were enthusiastic but were phishing the group for sales. But I'm left with the following two points: 1. I don't think there's much debate about ozone in water because it is an effective disinfectant. And there is almost never any residual ozone left over because it breaks down from O3 to O2 quickly. Therefore, people are not exposed to O3. Not even when they drink ozonated water. 2. I'm having difficulty understanding why you specified ear insufflation, which is direct injection of ozone into the ear. If, as you agreed, breathing ozone into the lungs (diluted with air) can kill, then how can injecting a concentrated stream of ozone directly onto human tissue in your ears (or other orifices) be safe? I'm wanting to be sure I understand what you want and how you expect to achieve it because I don't see how ozone will help without causing additional harm. Carl Grimes Healthy Habitats LLC ----- I think we can all agree no one should ever breath Ozone. It is a pollutant in that respect ofcourse. The Olympic pool for the 2008 Beijing Olympics (state of the art) was cleaned and sanitized by one thing, it was Ozone. Not one drop of Chlorine was used. Countless cities across the globe (not is usa i dont think) are now using Ozone gas for purifying public water sources deemed safe for human consumption. If you pick up some purified water bottles at your local grocery store you will see the terms " filtered by ozonation " , some not all ofcourse. No one should ever breath in Ozone, In my opinion it can kill you. But its obvious some uses of Ozone can benefit society when done and used by professionals. IMHO Elias Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.