Re: Post: court of Appeal Upholds Libel Verdict Against Mold Activist

[Guest guest]

Justice is TRULEY BLIND they only see what they want to see..................

 

God Bless !!

dragonflymcs

Mayleen

________________________________

From: KC <tigerpaw2c@...>

Sent: Thu, September 16, 2010 10:51:52 PM

Subject: [] Post: court of Appeal Upholds Libel Verdict Against

Mold Activist

 

Post: court of Appeal Upholds Libel Verdict Against Mold Activist

Posted by sangamon811 on 9/16/10

http://toxlaw.com/chatboards/blackmold/topic2634/9.16.10.14.16.52.html

I am from Veritox, and for persons who have been following

issues related to Dr. Kelman, I thought you would be

interested in this recent court ruling:

Court of Appeal Upholds Libel Verdict Against Mold

Activist

Ruling affirms 2008 ruling that Dr. Bruce Kelman,

President of Veritox, was victim of defamation

SEATTLE (September 16, 2010) – The California Court of

Appeal this week affirmed the judgment in favor of Dr.

Bruce Kelman of Veritox®, Inc., determining that Dr. Bruce

Kelman was libeled by activist Sharon Kramer. In a

unanimous opinion, Division One of the Fourth Appellate

District upheld the jury's verdict in Dr. Kelman's favor

and also ordered Kramer to pay costs to Dr. Kelman.

The Court upheld the 2008 verdict by a San Diego County

Superior Court jury that found. Kramer libeled Dr. Kelman

when she published a press release in March 2005 stating

that Dr. Kelman had altered his under-oath statements on

the witness stand when he testified as a witness in an

Oregon lawsuit. The jury found that Kramer's statement was

false and defamatory and that she had published it with

malice.

In addition to upholding the 2008 ruling, the appellate

court affirmed the trial court's award of costs to Dr.

Kelman, and also found that he was entitled to recover

costs on appeal.

California Court of Appeal ruling (9/14/2010)

-------------------------------------

Posted by Sharon Kramer on 9/16/10

Sangamon811,

http://freepdfhosting.com/c60b04d58f.pdf

Sharon

[Guest guest]

This idiot will keep drinking the ACOEM kool-aid.  Feel sorry for him, cause

you know what happens to followers who drink kool-aid??

From: KC <tigerpaw2c@...>

Subject: [] Post: court of Appeal Upholds Libel Verdict Against

Mold Activist

Date: Thursday, September 16, 2010, 6:51 PM

st: court of Appeal Upholds Libel Verdict Against Mold Activist

Posted by sangamon811 on 9/16/10

http://toxlaw.com/chatboards/blackmold/topic2634/9.16.10.14.16.52.html

I am from Veritox, and for persons who have been following

issues related to Dr. Kelman, I thought you would be

interested in this recent court ruling:

[Guest guest]

So the abuse will continue for the sick.

--- In , a Townsend

[Guest guest]

THIS MAKES ME ILL!!! KEEP YOUR HEAD UP SHARON! WE KNOW THE TRUTH even if they

don't! The TRUTH will come to Light, soon!

>

> Post: court of Appeal Upholds Libel Verdict Against Mold Activist

> Posted by sangamon811 on 9/16/10

>

> http://toxlaw.com/chatboards/blackmold/topic2634/9.16.10.14.16.52.html

>

> I am from Veritox, and for persons who have been following

> issues related to Dr. Kelman, I thought you would be

> interested in this recent court ruling:

>

> Court of Appeal Upholds Libel Verdict Against Mold

> Activist

>

> Ruling affirms 2008 ruling that Dr. Bruce Kelman,

> President of Veritox, was victim of defamation

>

> SEATTLE (September 16, 2010) – The California Court of

> Appeal this week affirmed the judgment in favor of Dr.

> Bruce Kelman of Veritox®, Inc., determining that Dr. Bruce

> Kelman was libeled by activist Sharon Kramer. In a

> unanimous opinion, Division One of the Fourth Appellate

> District upheld the jury's verdict in Dr. Kelman's favor

> and also ordered Kramer to pay costs to Dr. Kelman.

>

> The Court upheld the 2008 verdict by a San Diego County

> Superior Court jury that found. Kramer libeled Dr. Kelman

> when she published a press release in March 2005 stating

> that Dr. Kelman had altered his under-oath statements on

> the witness stand when he testified as a witness in an

> Oregon lawsuit. The jury found that Kramer's statement was

> false and defamatory and that she had published it with

> malice.

>

> In addition to upholding the 2008 ruling, the appellate

> court affirmed the trial court's award of costs to Dr.

> Kelman, and also found that he was entitled to recover

> costs on appeal.

>

>

>

> California Court of Appeal ruling (9/14/2010)

> -------------------------------------

>

> Posted by Sharon Kramer on 9/16/10

>

> Sangamon811,

>

> http://freepdfhosting.com/c60b04d58f.pdf

>

> Sharon

>