Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Outdoor Mold

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

The topic of " outdoor mold " seems to be a confusing one, but addressing it has

been extremely important in my own recovery.

& #8232;I thus thought I'd summarize some of what I believe to the case about

this topic, in the hope that others will contribute their thoughts and as a

basis for future discussions about other topics.

First, when I talk about " mold, " it always is in reference to the toxins that

mold makes. I am not talking about the allergic reactions that people may have

to the spores.

Most experts (including Ritchie Shoemaker) agree that toxic mold grows mostly

indoors, where the conditions are more favorable for it. Non-toxic molds are

thought to generally grow more easily outdoors, thus providing enough

competition that the toxic species don't get much of a foothold.

Nonetheless, a number of Moldies have reported that the outside air can have the

exact same effects on them as moldy buildings and as objects contaminated from

moldy buildings. This effect is different than what they get from any other

chemical, they state.

It's my belief that for people who are hyperreactive to toxic mold, being aware

of mold in the outside air is criticial in achieving wellness. I've yet to find

anyone who has stated that s/he has extreme reactions to objects or mildly

contaminated buildings who has achieved real wellness living in a place with a

significant outdoor toxic mold problem (unless they make specific efforts to

compensate for such exposures in ways that are too complex to be outlined in

this post).

People who are hyperreactive to the presence of outdoor mold state that it is a

particular problem in certain places. It seems clear that all major cities in

the U.S. are problematic, though some are worse than others. Certain less

populated places are problematic as well.

The question thus is, where does the outdoor toxic mold come from?

Following are two possibilities, both of which seem to me to be happening.

1. Mold toxin inside buildings makes its way outside of buildings.

The indoor air quality industry seems to make the assumption that " indoor " air

is categorically different from " outdoor " air.

However, air from buildings gets outside into the environment as a result of

normal circulation. Likely the subsequent dilution will cause it not to be an

issue for normal people. But for those of us who are reactive to even washed

objects from moldy buildings, it doesn't seem implausible that the mold toxins

escaping from buildings into the outside air would have an effect too.

Toxic mold illness is not driven by the presence of the spores, but rather by

the toxins. One individual reported his observation of that on this board in

2000, and a variety of experts (including Dr. Thrasher) have since stated their

concurrence.

Stachy makes a heavy sticky spore that sinks almost immediately to the ground.

Most of these spores quickly disintegrate into spore fragments, which remain

poisonous. Dust particles also absorb the poison.

While intact stachy spores are so heavy that they likely will remain pretty much

in place, spore fragments and poison dust particles are blown easily throughout

a building and into the outdoors. These particles gradually release their

poisons into the air.

Air spore testing seems like it never would uncover this phenomenon, since it

does not pick up on the presence of spore fragments, poison dust and satratoxin

gas. While it may pick up on the presence of spores of some other species of

toxic mold that are better " floaters, " those may or may not be especially

problematic for us. It's hard to know until more research is done.

All things being equal, it seems reasonable to think that more of this outdoor

stachy toxin (and more toxic mold as a whole) will be present in populated

environments. More populated environments include a higher density of

buildings, a certain percentage of which are bound (at least in the U.S. at this

point in time) to have severe toxic mold problems. The increasing evidence that

EMF's cause molds to create more potent toxins provides another possible reason

why the toxins would be worse in cities.

Those of us who are particularly sensitive to toxic mold in the outdoor

environment have observed that very bad buildings do indeed have a " bad zone "

around them. These bad zones extend further into the environment, changing as a

result of wind direction. These moving clouds of toxins (or " plumes " ) can have

an effect quite a ways from their point of origin, especially in times of cloudy

weather. Their effects seem to be less on sunny days, suggesting that UV rays

or some other factor may be degrading them.

Areas that are not as populated generally have less outdoor toxic mold, though

there are some exceptions. Observations and speculations on this phenomenon

would be a good topic for future discussion.

2. It seems that some particularly problematic toxic mold actually DOES grow

outside.

There seems to be at least one strain of toxic mold having very specific

systemic effects that does grow outside under specific conditions.

It especially has been observed in conjunction with areas of forests that have

been treated with fire retardants and with sewage treatment facilities

(including outdoor sewer ponds), and thus conceivably could be using specific

chemicals to potentiate its own poisons.

The presence of this mold growing in the outdoors seems to be growing in

prevalence, suggesting that it may be a relatively new strain (i.e. having

emerged in the past 40 years).

Locations with a lot of this mold growing in the outdoors are very problematic

regardless of how populated they are.

Obviously all of this is based on the individual observations of Moldies rather

than on the reports of researchers. Perhaps research will be done to verify

those observations in the near future.

Hopefully Dr. Thrasher, Carl or others who are well versed in this subject will

contribute their thoughts or criticisms to this discussion.

Best,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WHO SAYS THERES NOTHING IN A SPORE OR ATTACHED TO A SPORE THATS NOT TOXIC? why

are you trying to make a issue out of outdoor mold?

>

> The topic of " outdoor mold " seems to be a confusing one, but addressing it has

been extremely important in my own recovery.

> & #8232;I thus thought I'd summarize some of what I believe to the case about

this topic, in the hope that others will contribute their thoughts and as a

basis for future discussions about other topics.

>

> First, when I talk about " mold, " it always is in reference to the toxins that

mold makes. I am not talking about the allergic reactions that people may have

to the spores.

>

> Most experts (including Ritchie Shoemaker) agree that toxic mold grows mostly

indoors, where the conditions are more favorable for it. Non-toxic molds are

thought to generally grow more easily outdoors, thus providing enough

competition that the toxic species don't get much of a foothold.

>

> Nonetheless, a number of Moldies have reported that the outside air can have

the exact same effects on them as moldy buildings and as objects contaminated

from moldy buildings. This effect is different than what they get from any

other chemical, they state.

>

> It's my belief that for people who are hyperreactive to toxic mold, being

aware of mold in the outside air is criticial in achieving wellness. I've yet

to find anyone who has stated that s/he has extreme reactions to objects or

mildly contaminated buildings who has achieved real wellness living in a place

with a significant outdoor toxic mold problem (unless they make specific efforts

to compensate for such exposures in ways that are too complex to be outlined in

this post).

>

> People who are hyperreactive to the presence of outdoor mold state that it is

a particular problem in certain places. It seems clear that all major cities in

the U.S. are problematic, though some are worse than others. Certain less

populated places are problematic as well.

>

> The question thus is, where does the outdoor toxic mold come from?

>

> Following are two possibilities, both of which seem to me to be happening.

>

>

> 1. Mold toxin inside buildings makes its way outside of buildings.

>

> The indoor air quality industry seems to make the assumption that " indoor " air

is categorically different from " outdoor " air.

>

> However, air from buildings gets outside into the environment as a result of

normal circulation. Likely the subsequent dilution will cause it not to be an

issue for normal people. But for those of us who are reactive to even washed

objects from moldy buildings, it doesn't seem implausible that the mold toxins

escaping from buildings into the outside air would have an effect too.

>

> Toxic mold illness is not driven by the presence of the spores, but rather by

the toxins. One individual reported his observation of that on this board in

2000, and a variety of experts (including Dr. Thrasher) have since stated their

concurrence.

>

> Stachy makes a heavy sticky spore that sinks almost immediately to the ground.

Most of these spores quickly disintegrate into spore fragments, which remain

poisonous. Dust particles also absorb the poison.

>

> While intact stachy spores are so heavy that they likely will remain pretty

much in place, spore fragments and poison dust particles are blown easily

throughout a building and into the outdoors. These particles gradually release

their poisons into the air.

>

> Air spore testing seems like it never would uncover this phenomenon, since it

does not pick up on the presence of spore fragments, poison dust and satratoxin

gas. While it may pick up on the presence of spores of some other species of

toxic mold that are better " floaters, " those may or may not be especially

problematic for us. It's hard to know until more research is done.

>

> All things being equal, it seems reasonable to think that more of this outdoor

stachy toxin (and more toxic mold as a whole) will be present in populated

environments. More populated environments include a higher density of

buildings, a certain percentage of which are bound (at least in the U.S. at this

point in time) to have severe toxic mold problems. The increasing evidence that

EMF's cause molds to create more potent toxins provides another possible reason

why the toxins would be worse in cities.

>

> Those of us who are particularly sensitive to toxic mold in the outdoor

environment have observed that very bad buildings do indeed have a " bad zone "

around them. These bad zones extend further into the environment, changing as a

result of wind direction. These moving clouds of toxins (or " plumes " ) can have

an effect quite a ways from their point of origin, especially in times of cloudy

weather. Their effects seem to be less on sunny days, suggesting that UV rays

or some other factor may be degrading them.

>

> Areas that are not as populated generally have less outdoor toxic mold, though

there are some exceptions. Observations and speculations on this phenomenon

would be a good topic for future discussion.

>

>

> 2. It seems that some particularly problematic toxic mold actually DOES grow

outside.

>

> There seems to be at least one strain of toxic mold having very specific

systemic effects that does grow outside under specific conditions.

>

> It especially has been observed in conjunction with areas of forests that have

been treated with fire retardants and with sewage treatment facilities

(including outdoor sewer ponds), and thus conceivably could be using specific

chemicals to potentiate its own poisons.

>

> The presence of this mold growing in the outdoors seems to be growing in

prevalence, suggesting that it may be a relatively new strain (i.e. having

emerged in the past 40 years).

>

> Locations with a lot of this mold growing in the outdoors are very problematic

regardless of how populated they are.

>

>

> Obviously all of this is based on the individual observations of Moldies

rather than on the reports of researchers. Perhaps research will be done to

verify those observations in the near future.

>

> Hopefully Dr. Thrasher, Carl or others who are well versed in this subject

will contribute their thoughts or criticisms to this discussion.

>

> Best,

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

personally, I take offence to you useing this group to write your book.

we are not here for you to make money off of. we get enough of that crap.

besides that why would you need this groups input with the great expertize of

the desert men? I'm about to delete all my archived posts than you can do

whatever. maybe you should have asked people first.

> >

> > The topic of " outdoor mold " seems to be a confusing one, but addressing it

has been extremely important in my own recovery.

> > & #8232;I thus thought I'd summarize some of what I believe to the case about

this topic, in the hope that others will contribute their thoughts and as a

basis for future discussions about other topics.

>

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree with about the moldy buildings and the " bad zone " around

them. There is a shopping center here in Dallas and the entire building (as many

as 15 stores) has a flat roof. Every single store in that shopping center has

stained ceiling tiles. I just wanted to agree that I cannot even walk the

sidewalk around these units without getting " hit " as you can smell/feel the mold

all around the entire building. Crazy..dont know whoever came up with the idea

of flat roofs, but not a wise design... D

>

> The topic of " outdoor mold " seems to be a confusing one, but addressing it has

been extremely important in my own recovery.

> & #8232;I thus thought I'd summarize some of what I believe to the case about

this topic, in the hope that others will contribute their thoughts and as a

basis for future discussions about other topics.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...