Re: Re: Codex Alimentarius - Not signed into Law

[Guest guest]

Mayleen,

Sorry but I'm trying to understand this part about supplements

within a complicated bill covering other things. It sounds like one

of those double negative exceptions so I can't quite figure out

who is doing what.

Is anybody following this who can clarify?

Carl Grimes

Healthy Habitats LLC

-----

Thank you Carl,

I am trying to understand this so can you tell me about this other piece of

info:

http://www.anh-usa.org/further-update-on-our-story-supplements-

gain-exemption-from-codex-language-in-senate-food-safety-bill/

God Bless !!

dragonflymcs

Mayleen

________________________________

From: Carl E. Grimes <grimes@...>

Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 1:29:38 AM

Subject: Re: [] Re: Codex Alimentarius - Not signed into

Law

Joe,

Thanks for this excellent information. It seems very inclusive and

is much needed. I just wish they had included some of the other

programs such as those in the Healthy Housing offices of several

of the government agencies. CDC and HUD aren't included at all.

Carl Grimes

Healthy Habitats LLC

----------

The following section of this message contains a file attachment

prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.

If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system,

you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.

If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

---- File information -----------

File: DEFAULT.BMP

Date: 16 Jun 2009, 0:10

Size: 358 bytes.

Type: Unknown

[Guest guest]

It is a really tough issue. Some food supplements become drugs and stand

the chance of being improperly regulated much to the detriment of the

environmentally ill. Some foods need to be better regulated to prevent

environmental illness from them being unregulated. So...as always, the REAL

question becomes who is doing the regulating of what, for what purpose and

based

on what evidence; and how do you legislate that?

Sharon

In a message dated 9/14/2010 8:22:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,

dragonflymcs@... writes:

So is the term used in the bill scientific based evidence (something in

that

wording ) going to be door for this ? The wording in the bill is not very

clear.

God Bless !!

dragonflymcs

Mayleen

[Guest guest]

might i add that what we need is less factory farmed and processed

frankenfood and more organic, locally raised and grown in small farms,

minimally processed food and then we wouldn't need to have all the food

deadened thru irradiation, ultrapasteurization, etc. etc. and we would

need fewer supplements because the food would be alive and chock full of

nutrients!

sue v

>It is a really tough issue. Some food supplements become drugs and stand

>the chance of being improperly regulated much to the detriment of the

>environmentally ill. Some foods need to be better regulated to prevent

>environmental illness from them being unregulated. So...as always,

>the REAL

>question becomes who is doing the regulating of what, for what purpose

>and based

>on what evidence; and how do you legislate that?

>

[Guest guest]

That would be a good start.  When you are ill though you may need

supplementation as your body would use more of it supply to help it fight

disease.  So in some cases supplementation is necessary. 

 

 The sad part is also many are not aware of the dangers of those you spoke of

and truley believe Institutions are watching out for us, our food, our well

being and are falsely mislead.

________________________________

From: sue <svican@...>

Sent: Tue, September 14, 2010 12:26:39 PM

Subject: Re: [] Re: Codex Alimentarius - Not signed into Law

 

might i add that what we need is less factory farmed and processed

frankenfood and more organic, locally raised and grown in small farms,

minimally processed food and then we wouldn't need to have all the food

deadened thru irradiation, ultrapasteurization, etc. etc. and we would

need fewer supplements because the food would be alive and chock full of

nutrients!

sue v

[Guest guest]

I saw that isn't it horrible??  Our corn is contaminated GE food, papaya from

Hawai mostly GE due to cross contamination of GE crops to all others.  This

happened quite some time ago yet they insist on doing this still.   What that

company is doing is horrible running all food.  Plants now have patents. 

Unbelievable.  

________________________________

From: osisposis <jeaninem660@...>

Sent: Tue, September 14, 2010 4:43:18 PM

Subject: [] Re: Codex Alimentarius - Not signed into Law

 

Blood on our Farms: Is Monsanto Responsible for 1 Suicide Every 30 Minutes?

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/09/03/monsanto-caused-an\

-estimated-150000-farmer-suicides.aspx