Guest guest Posted September 30, 2010 Report Share Posted September 30, 2010 I am very sorry that you lost your dad, but you have to understand that age was a factor there also. telling people they are on a slow path to sure death is not what they need to hear and it's just not true. if death was going to grab you because of these exposures, by logic, it would have done so during the exposure or shortly afterwards. you have to get this thought process out of your head for your own good. > > Joe, to me re-exposures are part of the learning process, it's basicly unavoidable, even harder when your brain isn't functioning up to parr. I disagree with you as far a the time clock ticking theory. > most re-exposures are not comparerable to constant chronic exposure. > less is still better, complete advoidance is HARD weither it's by accident or forgetfulness with brain cognitive disfunctions. > to me death is something that might happen if you dont get out of the first WDB exposure if it's a bad one or if you get so damaged that you have a hard time recovering from that exposure,if at all, than move into and have another chronic exposure in a bad WDB situation. > age can also be a factor not only with defences against this illness but also once ill from a first exposure a second chronic exposure could be very bad. > I see two possablities with this illness and ageing, > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.