Guest guest Posted September 30, 2010 Report Share Posted September 30, 2010 Joe, to me re-exposures are part of the learning process, it's basicly unavoidable, even harder when your brain isn't functioning up to parr. I disagree with you as far a the time clock ticking theory. most re-exposures are not comparerable to constant chronic exposure. less is still better, complete advoidance is HARD weither it's by accident or forgetfulness with brain cognitive disfunctions. to me death is something that might happen if you dont get out of the first WDB exposure if it's a bad one or if you get so damaged that you have a hard time recovering from that exposure,if at all, than move into and have another chronic exposure in a bad WDB situation. age can also be a factor not only with defences against this illness but also once ill from a first exposure a second chronic exposure could be very bad. I see two possablities with this illness and ageing, 1, haveing the damages from this illness and decreesed defence abilities that come with age could be pretty hard on some of us. 2. haveing the knowledge, practicing advoidance and recovering hopefully to a fairly good point (younger age a helping factor)and again haveing the knowledge of advoidance not only to toxins,ect. in WDB's but also knowledge of other chemicals in our world, unsafe tap water ect. might make us outlive the rest of human kind. frankly I dont believe all that hogwash about exposures during childhood aiding tolerance,ect. our bodies go through a lot of changes with puberity, seems that around age 50-60 and on in a progressive manor our defence system weakens. we had premature weaking of our defence systems, it's going to be hard for us. age well be even more of a factor. still, theres a hudge difference in re-exposures and chronic exposure. life is for liveing, everyone has to make their own choises. do I choose to visit a friend even though I know I well suffer for it or do I set here and alone. it's was a given for me to spend a lot of time alone for the last several years, my reactivity was so bad I couldn't possabily enjoy anything if I was suffering the effects that I usually did, I hated it, I missed out on many years of my grandchildren growing up, I cant even believe how old they are now and I so hate the time lost with family because of this stupied illness. I had no choise, some can tolerate better and have more choise. one thing I know is that this illness can dictate your lifestyle for you, not the other way around, unless your a glutton for punishment. I'm along ways from well, but I can have somewhat limited times away from my hermititation, sometimes I pay for it, sometimes I get along fairly well. maybe I got to the point of illness with my exposures that almost any exposure is less and so better. maybe thats why I dont understand your reasoning, I dont see the time process that you are talking about with haveing re-exposures vs. chronic exposures as being as harmful the initial exposure that put me here. I have suffered set backs with re-exposures, some lasting a few months, but it still does not compare to chronic exposure, to me. surely the presentage of advoidance plays a role here, the more the better. from the time of my first exposures it has been a very slow, but a process of getting better despite re-exposures, because I practice advoidance. are you saying that after initial exposure, short lived re-exposures continue to severly damage the system beyond initial exposures despite the practice of advoidance? is their a ratio or percentage that can be put on this? 24 hours in a day practiceing advoidance vs. a re-exposure witch sometimes can be long lasting, depending on what it is, and sometimes a fairly short lived reaction which can sometimes be cut even shorter by washing the sinuses, showering, ect. I understand some re-exposures can be pretty damageing,but in my view, those are limited as in one that causes symptoms that last for 2 months. many can be short lived with help, some have delayed effects but from what I've seen those usually reside in a week,+- still our bodies do have the ability to heal and even more so if we our younger and our first initial exposure was somewhat limited as far as damage in a sence of what our body can heal and what wont heal. so to me, jumping someone because they did something you wouldn't or couldn't do is judgeing them based on your experience, it doesn't work that way. if they can handle if,maybe their body can handle too. our bodies are still in healing mode, when that stops do to age or other factors that well make a hudge difference on what we can handle, what our bodies can handle. > > Hi Robin, > Now, let me tell you the " mold facts of life " . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.