Moldy UC Dorm, No wonder Regents want UC name left on Chamber Mold Publication

[Guest guest]

MESSAGE TO REGENTS UC

6/22/2010 4:15:47 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, SNK1955@... writes:

_Mold Concerns Taint UCD Dorm Project - Health News Story - KCRA

Sacramento_ (http://www.kcra.com/health/23982564/detail.html)

Dear Ms. Mac (General Counsel Regents UC) and Ms.Griffiths (Chief of

Staff, UC),

Does the above UC dorm situation have anything to do with the

Regents of the UC's failure to act to remove the influential UC name from the

US

Chamber's mold publication that, as I have evidenced for you, is used in

litigation to deny liability for claims of illness in workers and occupants

caused by moldy buildings?

Thank you in advance for your reply.

Sincerely,

Sharon Kramer

MESSAGE FROM Regents,

6.16.10 denying to take action to remove UC name from Chamber mold

publication:

_http://freepdfhosting.com/b640bb1beb.pdf_

(http://freepdfhosting.com/b640bb1beb.pdf)

MESSAGE TO UC INFORMING OF IMPLICATIONS OF IMPROPRIETY

6/16/2010 6:57:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, SNK1955@... writes:

Dear Ms.Ly and Ms.Mac,

Thank you for your reply. I don't think you are comprehending the matter

or the serious implications from the matter. The _University of California

name_ (http://freepdfhosting.com/a8baea5e37.pdf) should not have been on

the US Chamber of Commerce's " A Scientific View of the Health Effects of

Mold " in the first place.

Dr. Saxon has given sworn testimony that he _did not author this paper_

(http://freepdfhosting.com/daf7d27e86.pdf) that was a _paid for hire piece_

(http://freepdfhosting.com/43f07c34e8.pdf) initiated by a think-tank, the

_Manhattan Institute_ (http://freepdfhosting.com/da1f816865.pdf) , on behalf

of the US Chamber of Commerce. It was specifically written to be made

_accessible to judges_ (http://freepdfhosting.com/cfe9bff790.pdf) .

Nowhere is Dr. Saxon's name mention within the contract or _the billable

hours_ (http://freepdfhosting.com/43f07c34e8.pdf) for the creation of this

paper. The UC was not a party to the contract of this paid for hire work

purportedly done by a _Regents of the UC _

(http://freepdfhosting.com/0a9b2517ef.pdf) employee. California Education Code

section 92000 prohibits the use

of the University’s name in a way that implies,,,an affiliation that does

not exist. The evidence indicates an affiliation that does not exist, yet

falsely stated as existing on a publication of the US Chamber of Commerce.

The University of California name, which is a valuable resource to lend

credibility to any publication, has been misused as a recognized brand name to

instill bias in the courts. That bias, that has been mass marketed by

the US Chamber of Commerce is that the courts are to find all claims of

illness or death from mold are only being made because of " trial lawyers,

media,

and Junk Science " .

I am not attempting to tell the UC what they must do. What I am trying to

tell you, is that it is just a matter of time before some smart plaintiff

attorney connects the dots and the University of California finds

themselves named in a lawsuit for aiding and abetting the US Chamber of

Commerce and

financial stakeholders of moldy buildings to perpetrate a fraud on the

courts.

This would occur by the Regents failing to protect the appropriate usage

of a valuable resource, the influential UC name, from being misapplied to

instill bias in the courts, in a manner that is adverse to the health and

safety of the American public. It could be perceived as grounds for a

racketeering claim against the University.

Under the policies established that govern the stewardship of how UC

resources are use, " E Use of University Resources..The University of California

has a responsibility for the stewardship of University resources. " It is

not good stewardship to leave the University open for such liability by

allowing the resource of the UC name to be left on a political and sectarian

publication of which it is evidenced the UC had no involvement in authoring

in the first place.

All that I am interested in, is that the UC name not be misused to instill

bias in the courts against the sick and injured. I hope this helps to

clear up the matter and why it is of the utmost importance the UC act to

protect the UC name from being misused in a false affiliation with the US

Chamber

of Commerce; and to protect the valuable resources of the UC from being

dragged into litigation for willfully assisting the US Chamber of Commerce to

instill bias in the courts.

As a taxpayer in the State of California, I urge you to reconsider your

position of what is required of the UC to protect the valuable resource that

is owned by the state, namely the University of California.

Thank you,

Sharon Kramer

MESSAGE TO UC 6.10.10 DIRECTLY INFORMING HOW NAME IS USED TO BIAS COURTS:

_http://freepdfhosting.com/1ff83d97aa.pdf_

(http://freepdfhosting.com/1ff83d97aa.pdf)

MESSAGE TO UC 5.15.10 ACHEMMIC INFORMING UC OF HARM TO PUBLIC HEALTH FROM

THIS:

_http://freepdfhosting.com/e88548fd20.pdf_

(http://freepdfhosting.com/e88548fd20.pdf)

6.22.10 And back to their financial interest of leaving the UC name on

the Chamber mold publication:

_http://www.kcra.com/health/23982564/detail.html_

(http://www.kcra.com/health/23982564/detail.html)