Guest guest Posted February 4, 2011 Report Share Posted February 4, 2011 Does anyone (MD preferably) have any language that can be used in court to explain that when someone is exposed to mold and partially permanently disabled, that the treatment that is often used for chemical sensitivity and respiratory issues is " avoidance " vs pharma. I need some documentation to share with my attorney from a respected resource that explains that going to the Dr every 60 days isn't what I need - and that I simply need to be able to work from home when I can to avoid chemicals in 99% of offices or jobs in this country. They are telling me I should be sending out resumes and I am explaining that I can't work around people's perfume/cologne/cleaners....BUT that I'm not totally disabled in the respect that I can work when I'm well enough and not exposed to these things. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2011 Report Share Posted February 4, 2011 that does seem to be a very hard thing to get most lawyers to understand. other than approching it based on CIRS and these exposures cause increased inflammation which affect many organs includeing the brain which hinder cogntive function, I dont know. the 3 papers on TH17 that Dr. Thrasher has might help. maybe along with the paper " the danger model " and " macrophages on the dark side " the diagnoses of MCS as far as disability goes anyway may help you. thinking there is a code for that, someone here should know it. it all basicly comes down to inflammation and these exposures cause that and inflammation in the brain isn't something that should be taken lightly. have you been diagnosed with MCS or TE or CIRS? of corse most lawyers want documentation of repeated doctor visits to get systoms verified, at least. they really dont get how hard it can be us to try to do that. getting them to understand the inflammatory disorder and how these exposures cause the inflammation to go wild is about the only way I know that might help them understand. > > Does anyone (MD preferably) have any language that can be used in court to > explain that when someone is exposed to mold and partially permanently disabled, > that the treatment that is often used for chemical sensitivity and respiratory > issues is " avoidance " vs pharma. > I need some documentation to share with my attorney from a respected resource > that explains that going to the Dr every 60 days isn't what I need - and that I > simply need to be able to work from home when I can to avoid chemicals in 99% of > offices or jobs in this country. > They are telling me I should be sending out resumes and I am explaining that I > can't work around people's perfume/cologne/cleaners....BUT that I'm not totally > disabled in the respect that I can work when I'm well enough and not exposed to > these things. > Thank you. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2011 Report Share Posted February 4, 2011 here is a link " http://www.aaemonline.org/chemicalsensitivitypost.html God Bless !! dragonflymcs Mayleen ________________________________ From: Missy Gluckmann <mopsyj77@...> Sickbldgs List < > Sent: Fri, February 4, 2011 2:52:30 PM Subject: [] for court Does anyone (MD preferably) have any language that can be used in court to explain that when someone is exposed to mold and partially permanently disabled, that the treatment that is often used for chemical sensitivity and respiratory issues is " avoidance " vs pharma. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.