Guest guest Posted September 1, 2012 Report Share Posted September 1, 2012 IN or OUT; the whole: DOES MERCURY cause AUTISM matter is in DOUBT The LEGAL California ban on mercury vaccines in 2004 was a LEGAL promise to their young infants that they would not be subject to injection of one of the worlds deadliest toxic chemicals filmed destroying brain cells years before. There may be no PROVEN link between autism and organomercury vaccines but there can never be any proof of anything, if as most people were told mercury was out in 1999 when in this year most regulators were not aware it was in any vaccines. Today in 2010 we see the REAL value of the 2004 LEGAL ban. It is PROPAGANDA. It always was PROPAGANDA. Any SANE person would expect that in California that mercury vaccines have not been given to infants for many years. What is certain, is that for many years mrercury has been given to the infants when it could be legally assumed that it was not in vaccines. So how can any research that does not measure the mercury content injected into children possible show whether mercury contributes to autism or not. Most if not all research does not measure ANY mercury content in vaccines or in infants and so the link cannot be proved or disproved. But the damning evidence of brain destruction MUST per se indicate DEFINITE and IRREVERSIBLE harm to infants from mercury vaccines the State says by law is not in vaccines but clearly IS in vaccines. Some countries in 2010 using mercury vaccines have STOPPED their use because of DEATH. We are past brain destruction and talking of the END of LIFE after mercury vaccines. But politicians, regulators and lawyers are HAPPY to inject the worlds deadly brain destroying chemical into infants and CLAIM that there is ABSOLUTELY no cause for worry. There is NO EVIDENCE of HARM from ANY organomercury vaccine given to a foetus, pregnant mum or infant to any of those politicians, regulators and lawyers Who practice DECEIT, LIES, OBFUSCATION And of course the PROPAGANDA: That a brain destroying chemical can hurt ANYONE But especially THEM. They are WRONG. In a DECENT country where HONESTY, JUSTICE and COMMON SENSE prevails. These politicians, regulators and lawyers would SUFFER from the deliberate injection of a toxic substance into infants that is still toxic even when diluted hundreds of times. Weapons of MASS DESTRUCTION in California in 2010. IN or OUT; the whole: DOES MERCURY cause AUTISM matter is in DOUBT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.