Guest guest Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 See below. Decisions such as this should help tremendously for insurers, etc. to understand the true importance of why it is less expensive in the long run for them to do the right thing in the first place when it comes to properly addressing water damaged buildings. (not the pretend importance they mass market - that some evil little people are going to feign being sick to get their hands on the insurer's money) When rulings such as below occur even more frequently, less people will be made unnecessarily ill from the situation. By the legal acknowledgement that mold causes illnesses; we are all going to save a lot of time and money - while stopping the unnecessary illness and even sometimes death. Good to see the ostrich approach to the matter is becoming passe'. Mold, Good Case Law. Causation Posted by Sharon on 5/21/10 COURTROOM NEWS Publishing Michigan Appellate Decision: LANSING, Mich. —Defendants in a mold case that resulted in a $303,260 verdict for a family... The Gennas complained that a water heater leak in ’s unit led to extensive mold contamination in the Genna home, and that they were forced to move after experiencing diarrhea, vomiting, congestion, nosebleeds, fevers and other symptoms. In affirming the verdict, the Court of Appeals found “ample circumstantial evidence that would ‘facilitate reasonable inferences of causation, not mere speculation. . .†(quoting Skinner v. Square D Co [445 Mitch 153, 163-164; 516 NW2d 475 (1994)]). Sharon Noonan Kramer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.