0.01 per cent. Is it harmful?

[Guest guest]

DO THE MATHS

Is there CLEAR evidence of harm from 0.01 per cent?

Something like this amount of money is being paid from Big Pharma earnings to

doctors to talk about their drug products.

None of this is in the least illegal but the secrecy of the payments is

disturbing to those who believe in transparency where health of the nation is at

stake and cancers,

neurological illnesses et al are rising from epidemic to pandemic proportions.

The list includes many doctors who get very small fees, possibly less than most

people would ask for going to another town, staying overnight and giving a talk

of an

hour or so.

But with many retired people on less than 10 000 dollars, euros, pounds it seems

strange to see some doctors getting hundreds of thousands of dollars for

« talks ».

0.01 per cent evenly spread out amongst healthy, grown-up and intelligent

doctors may do nothing except provide doctors with a free biro and their is

certainly no sign of

them dropping dead even when they get a hundred dollar CASH payout.

But those that pick up several hundred thousand dollars seem to be the

heavyweights amongst the doctors and they seem to get more than their fair share

of the 0.01

per cent « cake » that is being given out by Big Pharma. And while these

telephone number amounts again are completely legal their are lots of people who

« drop dead »

in amazement to think this amount of money is justified, justifiable or just.

Such is the secrecy, that top earners who are good at getting the message across

have been targetted by other Big Pharma companies who were unaware that the

criticism, loud, clear and unwanted was actually coming from those touting the

products of competitors rather than people who knew their product was lethal,

which it

transpired it was.

Coming in at several hundred thousand dollars today and possibly for the past

twenty years there is no sign of harm coming to this doctor from « search and

destroy »

tactics of some companies.

The only successful search and destroy campaign has just finished for a once UK

medical doctor who did not even criticise any drug company overtly and may even

have got them more money for them by breaking up vaccines as they were when they

had no critics.

The dividing lines between good and bad doctors is not always clear except that

those targetted are like vaccinated babies often innocent victims.

Today we are moving from dear and expensive drugs to colossally dear and

unaffordable GMO'd drugs. Quite apart from the fact that at several hundred

thousand

dollars a treatment; it would seem that like the dear drugs of today, they may

not actually work.

Talking to someone who was given a cocktail of drugs and battled to avoid death

they have told me of their friends, some now dead, that horrify me with my

decades of

reseaerch into drug harm. People in the UK going into hospital at age 30 with

minor breaks and sprains and coming out in a box after contracting MRSA and

dying. A bug

that in my childhood was zapped 100 per cent of the time with a two pound

presciption. Today drugs often don't work. Today this person tells me of her

visit to a UK

hospital and in the toilets seeing a stack of plastic chairs with a handwritten

note: « These have come from an MRSA ward and NEED cleaning ».

I can't even begin to talk about what this kind of bungling of safety this

entails. Just to say, another friend with a thiving private buisiness was

bankrupted by government

persons demanding they strip all wood from their enterprise and replace with

stainless steel. Wood known to have natural antibiotic properties and stainless

steel not

good when using a knife for chopping. It seems that these plastic chairs would

be a much worse hazard in a hospital full of germs than wood in a business where

no

bacterial contamination has ever happened.

While looking at the escalating costs of treatments often as for my friend and

her now dead friend it is obvious many of todays 2010 drugs do not work and may

even kill

you. All this at escalating costs.

Is there an alternative? Well as a chemist, physical analysis has been in use

for decades and involves using electromagnetic frequencies to oscillate and

resonate

material producing a fingerprint of the substance. This coming from resonance

where molecules literally shake themselves to pieces but only at very precise

frequencies

and power.

Microbes, bugs etc all have this weakness to be shaken, battered and killed just

like those false allegations against carers AFTER brain destroying vaccines.

This technique has been around for generations, so why isn't it in the ARMOURY

of EVERY doctor?

Well the home made device consists of a 9 volt battery, current price 3 euros

and two pieces of wire obtainable from a rubbish dump. This may or may not kill

every

known bug and cancer but we can't be certain as FDA, WHO, CDC and all

governments are not keen on these kinds of treatments and certainly not on

putting money into

a technique which has cured 400 cancers out of 400. A medical cure all that will

make the only cost of our health service that of a doctor's wages may be good

sense

for a government if they had good sense to see that there is just the matter of

a trillion pound power base with payouts of hundreds of thousands of dollars for

just one

« talk ».

We rely on using for example thimerosal for preserving vaccines. Something that

came in 150 years into vaccine technology and its use increasing in line with

sudden

unexpected deaths to infants ever since. Thimerosal killing the first makers and

then nearly a century later all the people it was given too in a now standard

safety test

where you finish the safety tests before adverse effects and not after. All well

the day after thimerosal injections and all dead three weeks later but the paper

proving

« safety » was already published.

So is 0.01 per cent harmful? Well if you do the maths, which one publishing

company has done, then a hundred dollars payout may be the going rate for a

« talk » but is

two hundred thousand acceptable, as well? And with the promise of GMO'd drugs of

the future at two hundred thousand dollars a treatment with no guarantees

against

a three euro « do it yourself » cure for all diseases, it seems strange that

in 2010, thimerosal, chemically the world's best brain destroying substance is

passed as

virtually obligatory to inject into the very young and the very old after 75

years of « safe » use and a three euro cure all has been banned, disgraced

and ignored for the

same length of time.

There is CLEAR evidence of harm from 0.01 per cent.

DO THE MATHS